International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 579–583 | Cite as

Complete penile disassembly in epispadias repair

  • Smail AcimiEmail author
  • Mohammed Ali Acimi
Urology - Original Paper



To report current results of complete penile disassembly technique in epispadias repair.


In ten years, we have preformed 31 complete penile disassembly for proximal epispadias repair. Twenty-four patients had epispadias after primary repair of bladder exstrophy and 7 isolated penopubic epispadias. The age of the patients ranged from 10 months to 6 years (median 3 years).


The shortening of urethral plate was found in 30 patients (97% of cases), and this shortening varied between 6 and 16 mm. However, in one patient we found a lengthening of the urethral plate of 8 mm. The narrowing of urethral plate was found in all patients, and this narrowing varied between 30 and 50% of the width of the plate. Postoperative complications encountered in our patients were dominated by fistulas and dehiscence, particularly in patients who had bladder exstrophy–epispadias complex. After dehiscence and fistulas repair, the cosmetic results were satisfying in 25 patients (80.5% of cases) with conical glans and meatus in orthotopic position without any necrosis of the glans. However, the urinary continence ≥ 1 h was observed in 6 patients (19% of cases) and only 3 patients (9.7% of cases) had a urinary continence ≥ 3 h. The mean follow-up was 61 months.


The complete penile disassembly remains one of the best techniques for epispadias repair. However, we noticed a reappearance of the dorsal curvature of the penis in a large number of patients treated for isolated epispadias and the impact of this technique on urinary incontinence remains uncertain.


Bladder exstrophy Urinary continence Epispadias Complete penile disassembly Mitchell’s technique 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study conforms to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (June 1964) and subsequent amendments and the investigations were carried out to a high ethical standard. However, in our country, there is no formal and documented ethical approval from an appropriately constituted research ethics committee, which requires to be obtained for all studies involving human.


  1. 1.
    Thiersch C (1869) Ueber die entstehungsweise und operative Behandlung der epispadie. Arch Heitkund 10:20–25Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duplay S (1874) De l’hypospadias perinéo-scrotal et de son traitement. Arch Gen Med 23:513–530Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Young HH (1918) A new operation for epispadias. J Urol 2:144–137Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cantwell FV (1895) Operative treatment of epispadias repair by transplantation of the urethra. Ann Surg 22:689–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ransley PG, Duffy PG, Wollin M (1988) Bladder exstrophy closure and epispadias repair. In: Spitz L, Nixon HH (eds) Rob and smith’s operative surgery. Pediatric surgery, 4th edn. Butterworth, Boston, pp 620–632Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly JH, Eraklis AJ (1971) A procedure for lengthening the phallus in boys with exstrophy of the bladder. J Pediatr Surg 6:645–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelly JH (1995) Vesical exstrophy: repair using radical mobilization of soft tissues. Pediatric Surg Int 10:298–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mitchell ME, Bägli DJ (1996) Complete penile disassembly for epispadias repair: the Mitchell technique. J Urol 155:300–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Acimi S, Debbous L, Acimi MA, Khelil AL (2018) Is there a shortening of the urethral plate in complete penile disassembly used in epispadias repair, and what is its impact on the final outcomes? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71:1637–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berrettini A, Castagnetti M, Rigamonti W (2009) Radical soft tissue mobilization and reconstruction (Kelly procedure) for bladder exstrophy repair in males: initial experience with nine cases. Pediatr Surg Int 25:427–4231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Bägli DJ et al (2008) Outcome analysis of isolated male epispadias: single center experience with 33 cases. J Urol 179:1107–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baird AD, Gearhart JP, Mathews RI (2005) Applications of the modified Cantwell–Ransley epispadias repair in the exstrophy–epispadias complex. J Pediatric Urol 1:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hafez AT, Helmy T (2011) Complete penile disassembly for epispadias repair in postpubertal patients. Urology 78:1407–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perovic SV, Vukadinovic V, Djordjevic ML et al (1999) Penile disassembly technique for epispadias repair: variants of technique. J Urol 162:1181–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gearhart JP (2001) The bladder exstrophy–epispadias–cloacal exstrophy complex. In: Gearhart JP, Rink RC, Mouriquand PDE, editors. Pediatric urology volume Chap. 32. W. B. Saunders Co, Philadelphia, pp 511–546Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caione P, Nappo SG, Matarazo E et al (2013) Penile repair in patients with epispadias–exstrophy complex-can we prevent resultant hypospadias? J Urol 189:1061–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    El-Sherbiny MT, Hafez AT (2005) Complete repair of bladder exstrophy in boys: can hypospadias be avoided? Euro Urol 47:691–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cervellione RM, Husmann DA, Bivalacqua TJ et al (2010) Penile ischemic injury in the exstrophy/epispadias spectrum: new insights and possible mechanisms. J Pediatr Urol 6:450–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Visceral Surgery, Children’s Hospital Canastel, Faculty of MedicineUniversity Of OranOranAlgeria
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, EHU Oran, Faculty of MedicineUniversity Of OranOranAlgeria

Personalised recommendations