Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 33–40 | Cite as

Influence of symptomatic pseudoaneurysms on postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy: results of a matched pair analysis

  • M. T. WalachEmail author
  • N. Rathmann
  • S. Porubsky
  • D. Pfalzgraf
  • S. J. Diehl
  • M. Ritter
  • M. S. Michel
  • N. Wagener
  • P. Honeck
  • M. C. Kriegmair
Urology - Original Paper
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

A symptomatic pseudoaneurysm (SPA) is a rare but severe complication after partial nephrectomy (PN). Selective trans-arterial embolization (TAE) is the treatment of choice with high success rates. However, the influence of this intervention on postsurgical renal function has not been studied.

Methods

Between 2005 and 2016 we performed 1047 PNs at our institution. Postsurgical SPA occurred in 40 patients (3.8%). Patients with and without SPA were matched in a 1:2 ratio concerning tumor complexity (RENAL) and pre-operative renal function (CKD stage). Any CKD upstage and a relevant CKD progression (CKD ≥ III) were defined as endpoints. Furthermore, the influence of the amount of contrast agent applied during TAE was assessed.

Results

All patients with SPA were treated successfully with TAE. No significant difference could be detected concerning clinical, functional and surgical aspects. Median follow-up time accounted for 12.5 (6.75–27.5) months. Kaplan–Meier analyses detected an increased rate of any CKD upstage (p = 0.066) and relevant CKD progression (p = 0.01) in patients with SPA. Multivariate analysis identified post-operative SPA to be an independent predictor for a relevant CKD progression (HR 4.15, p = 0.01). The amount of contrast agents used did not have an impact on the development of a relevant CKD progression (p = 0.72).

Conclusion

Patients treated with TAE after PN show an additional risk for an impairment of renal function over time. Hence, those patients should explicitly be informed about possible consequences and closely monitored by nephrologists.

Keywords

Renal mass Partial nephrectomy Spontaneous pseudoaneurysm Embolization Kidney function 

Notes

Author contributions

MTW: Protocol/project development, Manuscript writing/editing, Data analysis, NR: Data collection/ critical revision and scientific input, SP: critical revision and scientific input, DP: critical revision and scientific input, SJD: critical revision and scientific input, MR: critical revision and scientific input, MSM: critical revision and scientific input, NW: critical revision and scientific input, PH: critical revision and scientific input, MCK: Protocol/project development, Manuscript writing/editing, Data analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Ljungberg B et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67(5):913–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pahernik S et al (2006) Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma with normal contralateral kidney: 25 years of experience. J Urol 175(6):2027–2031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simmons MN et al (2012) Functional recovery after partial nephrectomy: effects of volume loss and ischemic injury. J Urol 187(5):1667–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mir MC et al (2013) Parenchymal volume preservation and ischemia during partial nephrectomy: functional and volumetric analysis. Urology 82(2):263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharma N et al (2008) Correlation between loss of renal function and loss of renal volume after partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney. J Urol 179(4):1284–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gratzke C et al (2009) Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 104(4):470–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tobert CM, Riedinger CB, Lane BR (2014) Do we know (or just believe) that partial nephrectomy leads to better survival than radical nephrectomy for renal cancer? World J Urol 32(3):573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stephenson AJ et al (2004) Complications of radical and partial nephrectomy in a large contemporary cohort. J Urol 171(1):130–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jain S et al (2013) Incidence of renal artery pseudoaneurysm following open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and comparative analysis. J Urol 189(5):1643–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Netsch C et al (2010) Management of renal artery pseudoaneurysm after partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 28(4):519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uberoi J, Badwan KH, Wang DS (2007) Renal-artery pseudoaneurysm after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 21(3):330–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gahan JC et al (2013) Renal function outcomes following selective angioembolization for iatrogenic vascular lesions after partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 27(12):1516–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghoneim TP et al (2011) Selective arterial embolization for pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistula of renal artery branches following partial nephrectomy. J Urol 185(6):2061–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tinto HR et al (2014) Selective arterial embolization of life-threatening renal hemorrhage in four patients after partial nephrectomy. Diagn Interv Imaging 95(6):601–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strobl FF et al (2016) Renal pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulas as a complication of nephron-sparing partial nephrectomy: technical and functional outcomes of patients treated with selective microcoil embolization during a ten-year period. Rofo 188(2):188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parfrey PS et al (1989) Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both. A prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med 320(3):143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ozkok S, Ozkok A (2017) Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a review of practical points. World J Nephrol 6(3):86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nemoto N et al (2014) Impact of continuous deterioration of kidney function 6 to 8 months after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 113(10):1647–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maioli M et al (2012) Persistent renal damage after contrast-induced acute kidney injury: incidence, evolution, risk factors, and prognosis. Circulation 125(25):3099–3107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kriegmair MC et al (2015) Open partial nephrectomy for high-risk renal masses is associated with renal pseudoaneurysms: assessment of a severe procedure-related complication. Biomed Res Int 2015:981251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levey AS et al (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 130(6):461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Levey AS et al (2005) Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 67(6):2089–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cohenpour M et al (2007) Pseudoaneurysm of the renal artery following partial nephrectomy: imaging findings and coil embolization. Clin Radiol 62(11):1104–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lane BR et al (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney. J Urol 179(3):847–851. (discussion 852)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Singh D, Gill IS (2005) Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 174(6):2256–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parsons JK, Schoenberg MP (2001) Renal artery pseudoaneurysm occurring after partial nephrectomy. Urology 58(1):105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Helck A et al (2010) Diagnosis, therapy monitoring and follow up of renal artery pseudoaneurysm with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in three cases. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 46(2–3):127–137Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hyams ES et al (2011) Iatrogenic vascular lesions after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional study of clinical and renal functional outcomes. Urology 78(4):820–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shapiro EY et al (2009) Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Urology 74(4):819–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hu SL et al (2016) The nephrologist’s tumor: basic biology and management of renal cell carcinoma. J Am Soc Nephrol 27(8):2227–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kimura Y et al (2018) Long-term outcomes of selective renal artery embolization for renal arteriovenous fistulae with dilated venous sac. J Vasc Interv Radiol 290(7):952–957Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dagenais J et al (2017) Excisional precision matters: understanding the influence of excisional volume loss on renal function after partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 72(2):168–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Solomon R, Deray G (2006) How to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy and manage risk patients: practical recommendations. Kidney Int 69:S51–S53Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Laskey WK et al (2007) Volume-to-creatinine clearance ratio: a pharmacokinetically based risk factor for prediction of early creatinine increase after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(7):584–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Collins CS et al (2010) Long-term follow-up of renal function and blood pressure after selective renal arterial embolization. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 22(4):254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Varma PP et al (1993) Fatal intracerebral hemorrhage associated with severe hypertension following renal artery embolization. Int J Artif Organs 16(10):720–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. T. Walach
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Rathmann
    • 2
  • S. Porubsky
    • 3
  • D. Pfalzgraf
    • 1
  • S. J. Diehl
    • 2
  • M. Ritter
    • 1
  • M. S. Michel
    • 1
  • N. Wagener
    • 1
  • P. Honeck
    • 1
  • M. C. Kriegmair
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity Medical Centre MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineUniversity Medical Centre MannheimMannheimGermany
  3. 3.Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Centre MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations