Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

FISH analysis of washing urine from the upper urinary tract for the detection of urothelial cancers

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate FISH analysis of washing urine from the upper urinary tract (UUT) in comparison with cytology (Cyt) for the detection of urothelial cancers.

Patients and methods

In 82 patients with symptoms or abnormalities of the UUT sampling of washing urine for FISH and Cyt and a stepwise diagnostic work-up (e.g. retrograde ureteropyelography, ureterorenoscopy and endoscopic biopsy) were performed. In case of endoscopically and/or histologically proven malignancy patients either underwent nephroureterectomy, partial ureterectomy or local treatment. Sensitivity and specificity for FISH and Cyt as well as its combination were determined.

Results

Urothelial cancer of the UUT was detected in 20 patients. Eleven patients underwent nephroureterectomy, six partial ureterectomy and three endoscopic tumour treatment. This revealed nine pTa, three pT1 and seven muscle-invasive tumours. Twelve tumours were classified as low and seven as high-grade tumours. In one patient with a macroscopic unequivocal finding of tumour, endoscopic laser ablation without histologic confirmation was performed. FISH was evaluable in 76 patients and detected 16 tumours with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.2 and 91.1 %, respectively. Cyt was performed in 79 and was evaluable in 78 patients. It detected ten tumours with a sensitivity and specificity of 52.6 and 91.4 %, respectively. Cyt and FISH together detected 19 tumours with (sensitivity 100 % and specificity 83.6 %).

Conclusion

FISH was more sensitive than and equally specific to Cyt in the detection of urothelial cancers of the UUT. Both markers in combination revealed the best sensitivity, making it a possible approach in future settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tilki D, Burger M, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Hakenberg OW, Palou J et al (2011) Urine markers for detection and surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 60(3):484–92

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bubendorf L, Grilli B, Sauter G, Mihatsch MJ, Gasser TC, Dalquen P (2001) Multiprobe FISH for enhanced detection of bladder cancer in voided urine specimens and bladder washings. Am J Clin Pathol 116(1):79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarosdy MF, Schellhammer P, Bokinsky G, Kahn P, Chao R, Yore L et al (2002) Clinical evaluation of a multi-target fluorescent in situ hybridization assay for detection of bladder cancer. J Urol 168(5):1950–1954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Halling KC, King W, Sokolova IA, Meyer RG, Burkhardt HM, Halling AC et al (2000) A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 164(5):1768–1775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones JS (2006) DNA-based molecular cytology for bladder cancer surveillance. Urology 67(3 Suppl 1):35–45 (discussion-7)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Halling KC, King W, Sokolova IA, Karnes RJ, Meyer RG, Powell EL et al (2002) A comparison of BTA stat, hemoglobin dipstick, telomerase and Vysis UroVysion assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. J Urol 167(5):2001–2006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fadl-Elmula I, Gorunova L, Mandahl N, Elfving P, Lundgren R, Rademark C et al (1999) Cytogenetic analysis of upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 115(2):123–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nison L, Roupret M, Bozzini G, Ouzzane A, Audenet F, Pignot G et al (2013) The oncologic impact of a delay between diagnosis and radical nephroureterectomy due to diagnostic ureteroscopy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: results from a large collaborative database. World J Urol 31(1):69–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang WT, Li LY, Pang J, Ruan XX, Sun QP, Yang WJ et al (2012) Fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma in patients with asymptomatic hematuria and negative urine cytology. Neoplasma 59(4):355–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marin-Aguilera M, Mengual L, Ribal MJ, Burset M, Arce Y, Ars E et al (2007) Utility of a multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization assay in the detection of superficial urothelial bladder cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 173(2):131–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang J, Wu J, Peng L, Tu P, Li W, Liu L et al (2012) Distinguishing urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract from benign diseases with hematuria using FISH. Acta Cytol 56(5):533–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shan Z, Wu P, Zheng S, Tan W, Zhou H, Zuo Y et al (2010) Evaluation of upper urinary tract tumors by FISH in Chinese patients. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 203(2):238–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Akkad T, Brunner A, Pallwein L, Gozzi C, Bartsch G, Mikuz G et al (2007) Fluorescence in situ hybridization for detecting upper urinary tract tumors—a preliminary report. Urology 70(4):753–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mian C, Mazzoleni G, Vikoler S, Martini T, Knuchel-Clark R, Zaak D et al (2010) Fluorescence in situ hybridisation in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract tumours. Eur Urol 58(2):288–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Inc. V. UroVysion Protocols—(Bladder Cancer FISH Assay) 2000

  17. Kobayashi Y, Saika T, Miyaji Y, Saegusa M, Arata R, Akebi N et al (2012) Preoperative positive urine cytology is a risk factor for subsequent development of bladder cancer after nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 30(2):271–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Umiker W, Lapides J, Sourenne R (1962) Exfoliative cytology of papillomas and intra-epithelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Acta Cytol 6:255–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Highman WJ (1986) Transitional carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a histological and cytopathological study. J Clin Pathol 39(3):297–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guarnizo E, Pavlovich CP, Seiba M, Carlson DL, Vaughan ED Jr, Sosa RE (2000) Ureteroscopic biopsy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: improved diagnostic accuracy and histopathological considerations using a multi-biopsy approach. J Urol 163(1):52–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG (2003) Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a comprehensive literature review and meta-analyses. Urology 61(1):109–118 (discussion 18)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo B, Li W, Deng CH, Zheng FF, Sun XZ, Wang DH et al (2009) Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 189(2):93–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hajdinjak T (2008) UroVysion FISH test for detecting urothelial cancers: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and comparison with urinary cytology testing. Urol Oncol 26(6):646–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Skacel M, Fahmy M, Brainard JA, Pettay JD, Biscotti CV, Liou LS et al (2003) Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology. J Urol 169(6):2101–2105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Bianka Ilse for performing and evaluating the FISH tests and Dr. Thomas Lehmann for his statistical advice.

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Horstmann.

Additional information

Marcus Horstmann and Kerstin Junker contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gruschwitz, T., Gajda, M., Enkelmann, A. et al. FISH analysis of washing urine from the upper urinary tract for the detection of urothelial cancers. Int Urol Nephrol 46, 1769–1774 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0714-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0714-1

Keywords

Navigation