Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 955–960 | Cite as

On the lookout for danger: House Sparrow alert distance in three cities

  • Ian MacGregor-Fors
  • Javier Quesada
  • Jeffrey G.-H. Lee
  • Pamela J. YehEmail author
Article

Abstract

The House Sparrow Passer domesticus, closely associated with human presence along urban–agricultural landscapes and widely distributed outside its native range, has shown great morphological and physiological variations, with its plasticity linked to its invasiveness. Yet, there is a dearth of knowledge on the escape behavior of this sparrow along its North American invasion range. We here assessed House Sparrows alert distances in Los Angeles and Mexico City, but also in Barcelona as a control within its native distribution, considering ‘city’, ‘sex/age’ (adult males vs. adult females and juveniles), and ‘flock size’ as alert distance predictors. Through a linear model and a classification and regression tree, we identified that House Sparrow alert distances in Barcelona were significantly larger when compared to both studied North American cities (Los Angeles, Mexico City). Given that alert distances were also significantly larger in Los Angeles when contrasted with those from Mexico City, where it has been recently shown to be hyper-abundant, our results also suggest that its boldness could be related not only to an origin (native/non-native) driver, but also to a density-dependent process.

Keywords

Barcelona Flushing distance Los Angeles Mexico City Passer domesticus Urban ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are deeply thankful to the anonymous reviewers and Michelle García-Arroyo for their comments and suggestions that enhanced the quality and clarity of our manuscript, as well as Luis E. Sánchez-Ramos for his help with fieldwork in Mexico City, and Roger Guevara for his assistance with statistical procedures. Research funds were granted by UC MEXUS-CONACYT to P.J.Y. and I.M.-F. (CN-13-587), National Geographic Society to P.J.Y. and I.M.-F., the Natural Sciences Museum of Barcelona and Fundació Zoo de Barcelona to J. Q. (PASSERCAT-1 project), the UC Natural Reserve System to J.G.-H.L. (Mildred E. Mathias Graduate Student Research Grant Program), and the Santa Monica Bay Audubon Society to J.G.-H.L. (Small Grants for Field Study Projects).

References

  1. (INEGI) Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2010) Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010: Estados Unidos Mexicanos Resultados Preliminares. INEGI, AguascalientesGoogle Scholar
  2. (USCB) United States Census Bureau (2012) Statistical abstract of the United States: 2012. USDC 2012:111Google Scholar
  3. Anderson TR (2006) Biology of the ubiquitous house sparrow: from genes to population. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronson MF, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Williams NS, Cilliers S, Clarkson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Hedblom M, Klotz S, Kooijmans JL, Kühn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mörtberg U, Pysek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc Lond B 281:20133330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumstein DT (2003) Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J Wildl Manag 67:852–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumstein DT (2006) Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Anim Behav 71:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumstein DT, Fernández-Juricic E, LeDee O, Larsen E, Rodriguez-Prieto I, Zugmeyer C (2004) Avian risk assessment: effects of perching height and detectability. Ethology 110:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bókony V, Lendvai A, Liker A (2006) Multiple cues in status signalling: the role of wingbars in aggressive interactions of male house sparrows. Ethol 112:947–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown NS, Wilson GI (1975) A comparison of the ectoparasites of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) from North America and Europe. Am Midl Nat 94:154–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chávez-Zichinelli CA, MacGregor-Fors I, Talamás Rohana P, Valdéz R, Romano MC, Schondube JE (2010) Stress responses of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) to different urban land uses. Condor 98:183–189Google Scholar
  12. Cooke AS (1980) Observations on how close certain passerine species will tolerate an approaching human in rural and suburban areas. Biol Conserv 18:85–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawley MJ (2013) The R book. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  14. Demographia (2017) Demographia World Urban Areas (Built-Up Urban Areas or Urban Agglomerations) (13th annual edition). Wendell Cox Consultancy, BellevilleGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhindsa MS, Boag DA (1989) Influence of age on the flushing distance of marked and unmarked black-billed magpies. Ornis Scand 20:76–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Díaz M, Møller AP, Flensted-Jensen E, Grim T, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Jokimäki J, Markó G, Tryjanowski P (2013) The geography of fear: a latitudinal gradient in anti-predator escape distances of birds across Europe. PLoS One 8:e64634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Díaz M, Cuervo JJ, Grim T, Flensted-Jensen E, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Jokimäki J, Markó G, Tryjanowski P, Møller AP (2018) Interactive effects of fearfulness and geographical location on bird population trends. Behav Ecol 26:716–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eldredge N, Horenstein S (2014) Concrete jungle: new York City and our last best Hope for a sustainable future. University of California Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  19. Ensminger AL, Westneat DF (2012) Individual and sex differences in habituation and neophobia in house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Ethol 118:1085–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erwin M (1989) Responses to human intruders by birds nesting in colonies: experimental results and management guidelines. Colonial Waterbirds 12:104–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernández-Juricic E (2000) Local and regional effects of pedestrians on forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Condor 102:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernández-Juricic E, Jimenez MD, Lucas E (2001) Alert distance as an alternative measure of bird tolerance to human disturbance: implications for park design. Environ Conserv 28:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fernández-Juricic E, Jimenez MD, Lucas E (2002) Factors affecting intra- and inter-specific variations in the difference between alert distances and flight distances for birds in forested habitats. Can J Zool 80:1212–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fischer JD, Schneider SC, Ahlers AA, Miller JR (2015) Categorizing wildlife responses to urbanization and conservation implications of terminology. Conserv Biol 29:1246–1248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. González-Lagos C, Quesada J (2017) Stay or leave? Avian behavioral responses to urbanization in Latin America. In: MacGregor-Fors I, Escobar-Ibáñez JF (eds) Avian ecology in Latin American cityscapes. Springer, Cham, pp 99–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. González-Oreja JA, Zuria I, Carbó-Ramírez P, Charre GM (2018) Using variation partitioning techniques to quantify the effects of invasive alien species on native urban bird assemblages. Biol Inv 20:2861–2874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson MTJ, Munshi-South J (2017) Evolution of life in urban environments. Science 358:eaam8327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston RF, Selander RK (1964) House sparrows: rapid evolution of races in North America. Science 144:548–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnston RF, Selander RK (1971) Evolution in the house sparrow. II. Adaptive differentiation in north American populations. Evol 25:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnston RF, Selander RK (1973) Evolution in the house sparrow. III. Variation in size and sexual dimorphism in Europe and north and South America. Am Nat 107:373–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kark S, Iwaniuk A, Schalimtzek A, Banker E (2006) Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter. J Biogeogr 34:638–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kendeigh SC (1976) Latitudinal trends in the metabolic adjustments of the house sparrow. Ecology 57:509–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lendvai ÁZ, Liker A, Barta Z (2006) The effects of energy reserves and dominance on the use of social-foraging strategies in the house sparrow. Anim Behav 72:747–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liebl AL, Martin LB (2012) Exploratory behavior and stressor hyper-responsiveness facilitate range expansion of an introduced songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:4375–4381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lowther PE (1977) Selection intensity in north American house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Evol 31:649–656Google Scholar
  36. Lowther PE, Cink CL (2006) House sparrow (Passer domesticus). In: Rodewald PG (Eed) the birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/012. Accessed 28 September 2018
  37. MacGregor-Fors I, Morales-Pérez L, Quesada J, Schondube JE (2010) Relationship between the presence of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) and Neotropical bird community structure and diversity. Biol Inv 12:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacGregor-Fors I, Quesada J, Lee JG-H, Yeh PJ (2017) Space invaders: house sparrow densities along three urban–agricultural landscapes. Avian Cons Ecol 12:11Google Scholar
  39. Martin LB, Pless M, Svoboda J, Wikelski M (2004) Immune activity in temperate and tropical house sparrows: a common-garden experiment. Ecology 85:2323–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK (2015) Adaptation and adaptedness of organisms to urban environments. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 46:261–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDonnell MJ, MacGregor-Fors I (2016) The ecological future of cities. Science 352:936–938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Møller AP (2008) Flight distance of urban birds, predation, and selection for urban life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Møller AP, Díaz M (2018) Avian preference for close proximity to human habitation and its ecological consequences. Current Zool 64:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Møller AP, Díaz M, Flensted-Jensen E, Grim T, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Jokimäki J, Gaivo M, Tryjanowski P (2015) Urbanized birds have superior establishment success in novel environments. Oecologia 178:943–950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakagawa S, Burke T (2008) The mask of seniority? A neglected age indicator in house sparrows Passer domesticus. J Avian Biol 39:222–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nocedal J (1987) Las comunidades de pájaros y su relación con la urbanización en la Ciudad de México. In: Rapoport E, López-Moreno IR (eds) Aportes a la Ecología Urbana de la Ciudad de México. Limusa, Mexico City. pp. 73–103Google Scholar
  47. Ortega-Álvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I (2009) Living in the big city: effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landsc Urban Plan 90:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. R Development Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,. ViennaGoogle Scholar
  49. Samia DSM, Blumstein DT, Díaz M, Grim T, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Jokimäki J, Møller AP (2017) Rural-urban differences in escape behavior of European birds across a latitudinal gradient. Front Ecol Evol 5:66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Senar JC, Conroy MJ, Quesada J, Mateos-Gonzalez F (2014) Selection based on the size of the black tie of the great tit may be reversed in urban habitats. Ecol Evolution 4:2625–2632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Summers-Smith D, Christie DA, Garcia EFJ (2018) House sparrow (Passer domesticus). In: Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx Edicions, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  52. Therneau T, Atkinson B, Ripley B (2018) Rpart: recursive partitioning and regression trees. R package version 4.1–13. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  53. Vincze E, Papp S, Preiszner B, Seress G, Liker A, Bókony V (2015) Does urbanization facilitate individual recognition of humans by house sparrows? Anim Cogn 18:291–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Vincze E, Papp S, Preiszner B, Seress G, Bókony V, Liker A (2016) Habituation to human disturbance is faster in urban than rural house sparrows. Behav Ecol 27:1304–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wagner HO (1959) Die Einwanderung des Haussperlings in Mexiko. Ethol 16:584–592Google Scholar
  56. Warnes GR, Bolker B, Lumley T, Johnson RC (2018) Gmodels: various R programming tools for model fitting. R package version 2.18.1Google Scholar
  57. Wilson DS, Clark AB, Coleman K, Dearstyne T (1994) Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends Ecol Evol 9:442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Study Behav 16:229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Red de Ambiente y SustentabilidadInstituto de Ecología, A.C. (INECOL)XalapaMexico
  2. 2.Department of VertebratesNatural Sciences Museum of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Santa Fe InstituteSanta FeUSA

Personalised recommendations