Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 49–63 | Cite as

Forest ethnography: An approach to study the environmental history and political ecology of urban forests

Submission to “The Structure-Function Continuum: Understanding urban transformation through socio-ecological flows,” a special issue of Urban Ecosystems
  • Laura A. OgdenEmail author
  • Carissa Aoki
  • J. Morgan Grove
  • Nancy Falxa Sonti
  • William Hall
  • Dexter Locke
  • Steward T. A. Pickett
  • Miriam Avins
  • Katie Lautar
  • John Lagrosa
Article

Abstract

A landscape succession paradigm has shaped much of our understanding about the processes of forest emergence and transformation in the United States. Drawing heavily from theory and method in environmental history, this paradigm has focused attention on the role of landscape-scale shifts in land use and land cover in the production of forests. The geography of cities is patchy, dynamic and heterogeneous, with change and differences occurring at much smaller scales (e.g. Jacobs 1961; Clay 1973) compared to coarse scale of stand replacing successions affecting rural forests (Grove et al. Ecosyst Health and Sustain 2(9):e01239, 2016; Pickett et al. Urban Ecosyst 20(1):1–14, 2017). Therefore, trying to understand how urban forests came to be, as well as what they are, requires a research approach that is specific to the land use dynamics of cities and attentive to the social life of urban forests. In response to this methodological gap, this paper describes a research approach called “forest ethnography,” which we are piloting in Baltimore, Maryland as part of the Baltimore Ecosystem Study (BES), one of the National Science Foundation’s urban Long-term Ecological Research Programs (LTER). As we describe, we propose that an urban forest ethnography approach can contribute to our understanding of both forest environmental history and urban political ecology.

Keywords

Urban forests Dynamic heterogeneity Political ecology Urban ethnography Baltimore, MD 

References

  1. Agar M (1980) The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelo H, Wachsmuth D (2015) Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of methodological cityism. Inter J Urban Reg Research 39(1):16–27Google Scholar
  3. Avins M (2013) Baltimore’s forest patches: Emerald assets for ecosystem services, Baltimore Green Space. http:baltimoregreenspace.org/downloads/ForestPatchesWeb.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2017Google Scholar
  4. Baltimore City, Department of Planning (1992) Baltimore City supplement to the state forest conservation manual. http://planning.baltimorecity.gov/sites/default/files/RStateForestConservationManual_0.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2017
  5. Baltimore City Open GIS Data: Real Property (2017) http://gis-baltimore.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/b41551f53345445fa05b554cd77b3732_0. Accessed 5/4/2017
  6. Baltimore City Open GIS Data (2015) URL: https://gis.baltimorecity.gov/egis/rest/services/opengisdata/treecanopy/MapServer. Accessed 5/4/2017
  7. Bankoff G (2013) “Deep forestry”: Shapers of the Philippine forests. Environ Hist 18(3):523–556.  https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emt037
  8. Baviskar A (2003a) Between violence and desire: space, power, and identity in the making of metropolitan Dehli. Inter Social Science J 55(175):89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.5501009
  9. Baviskar A (2003b) For a cultural politics of natural resources. Econ Polit Wkly 28:5051–5055Google Scholar
  10. Bromley DW (1992) The commons, common property, and environmental policy. Environ Resour Econ 2(1):1–17Google Scholar
  11. Boone CG, Buckley GL, Grove JM, Sister C (2009) Parks and People: An Environmental Justice Inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Ann Assoc of Am Geogr 99(4):767–787Google Scholar
  12. Boone CG, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Schwartz K, Buckley GL (2010) Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: why the 60s matter. Urban Ecosyst 13(3):255–271Google Scholar
  13. Boone CG, Fragkias M, Buckley GL, Grove JM (2014) A long view of polluting industry and environmental justice in Baltimore. Cities 36:41–49Google Scholar
  14. Bond W, Keeley J (2005) Fire as a global “herbivore”: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends in Ecol Evol 20:387–394Google Scholar
  15. Braun B (2002) The Intemperate Rainforest: Nature, Culture, and Power on Canada’s West Coast. Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  16. Chowdhury RR, Larson K, Grove M, Polsky C, Cook E, Onsted J, Ogden L (2011) A Multi-Scalar Approach to Theorizing Socio-Ecological Dynamics at Urban Residential Landscapes. Cities and the Environment 4(1):article 6Google Scholar
  17. Chuang W-C, Boone CG, Locke DH, Grove JM, Buckley GL, Whitmer A, Zhang S (2018) Tree canopy change and neighborhood stability: A comparative analysis of Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD. Urban For Urban GreeningGoogle Scholar
  18. Clay G (1973) Close-Up: How to read the American city. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Amer Nat 111:1119–1144Google Scholar
  20. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cronon W (1983) Changes in the land: Indian, colonists and the ecology of New England. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Crooks JB (1968) Politics and Progress: The Rise of Urban Progressivism in Baltimore, 1895–1921. Louisiana State University Press, Baton RougeGoogle Scholar
  23. Cronon W (1992) Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great west. W. W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Du Bois WEB, Eaton I (1996) The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study. Univ. of Penn Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Escobar A (2008) Territories of difference: place, movements, life, redes. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  26. Emery MR, Hurley PT (2016) Ethnobiology in the city: Embracing the urban ecological moment. J Ethnobiol 36(4):807–819Google Scholar
  27. Euchner CC (1991) The Politics of Urban Expansion: Baltimore and the Sewerage Question, 1859–1905. Maryland Historical Magazine 86:3 (1991): 270–91Google Scholar
  28. Feeny D, Berkes F, McCay BJ, Acheson JM (1990) The tragedy of the commons: Twenty-two years later. Hum Ecol 18(1):1–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Foster D (1992) Land-use history (1730-1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. J Ecol 80(4):753–771Google Scholar
  30. Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53(1):77–88Google Scholar
  31. Foster D, Motzkin G, O’Keefe J, Boose E, Orwig D, Fuller J, Hall B (2004) The environmental and human history of New England. In: Forests in time: the environmental consequences of 1,000 years of change in New England. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 43–100Google Scholar
  32. Girão LC, Lopes AV, Tabarelli M, Bruna EM (2007) Changes in tree reproduction traits reduce functional diversity in a fragmented atlantic forest landscape. PLoS One 2:e908.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000908 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Grabbatin B, Hurley PT, Halfacre A (2011) “I Still Have the Old Tradition”: The co-production of sweetgrass basketry and coastal development. Geoforum 42(6):638–649Google Scholar
  34. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50(7):571–584Google Scholar
  35. Groffman PM, Pouyat RV, Cadenasso ML et al (2006) Land use context and natural soil controls on plant community composition and soil nitrogen and carbon dynamics in urban and rural forests. For Ecol Manag 236:177–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.002 Google Scholar
  36. Groffman PM, Cavender-Bares J, Bettez ND, Grove JM, Hall SJ, Heffernan JB, Hobbie SE, Larson KL, Morse JL, Neill C, Nelson K, O'Neil-Dunne J, Ogden L, Pataki DE, Polsky C, Chowdhury RR, Steele MK (2014) Ecological homogenization of urban USA. Front Ecol Environ 12:74–81.  https://doi.org/10.1890/120374 Google Scholar
  37. Grove JM (1996) The Relationship between patterns and processes of social stratification and vegetation of an urban - rural watershed. Dissertation, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental StudiesGoogle Scholar
  38. Grove JM, Locke DH, O’Neil-Dunne JPM (2014) An Ecology of Prestige in New York City: Examining the Relationships Among Population Density, Socio-economic Status, Group Identity, and Residential Canopy Cover. Environ Manag 54(3):402–419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0310-2 Google Scholar
  39. Grove JM, Pickett STA, Burch WRJ, Machlis G (2015) The Baltimore School of Urban Ecology: Space, Scale, and Time for the Study of Cities. Yale Univ Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  40. Grove JM, Childers DL, Galvin M, Hines S, Muñoz-Erickson T, Svendsen ES (2016) Linking science and decision making to promote an ecology for the city: practices and opportunities. Ecosyst Health and Sustain 2(9):e01239Google Scholar
  41. Grove JM, Ogden LA, Pickett STA, Boone CG, Buckley GL, Locke DH, Lord C (2018) The legacy effect: understanding how segregation and environmental injustice unfold over time in Baltimore. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 108(2):524–537Google Scholar
  42. Harvey D (1978) The urban process under capitalism: a framework for analysis. Inter J Urban Reg Research 2(1–4):103–131Google Scholar
  43. Harvey D (1987) The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Science Soc 51(1):121–125Google Scholar
  44. Heynen N, Kaika M, Swyngedouw E (2006) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Heynen N (2014) Urban political ecology I: The urban century. Prog Hum Geogr 38(4):598–604Google Scholar
  46. Heynen N (2016) Urban political ecology II: The abolitionist century. Prog Hum Geogr 40(6):839–845Google Scholar
  47. Heynen N (2017) Urban political ecology III: The feminist and queer century. Prog Hum Geogr. doi: 10.177/0309132517693336Google Scholar
  48. Hirsch E, O’Hanlon M (1995) The anthropology of landscape: Perspectives on place and space. Oxford Univ Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Huang G, Zhou W, Cadenasso ML (2011) Is everyone hot in the city? Spatial pattern of land surface temperatures, land cover and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics in Baltimore, MD. J Environ Manag 92:1753–1759Google Scholar
  50. Hurley PT, Halfacre AC, Levine NS, Burke MK (2008) Finding a “Disappearing” Nontimber Forest Resource: Using Grounded Visualization to Explore Urbanization Impacts on Sweetgrass Basketmaking in Greater Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. The Prof Geographer 60(4):556–578Google Scholar
  51. Hurley PT, Maccaroni M, Williams A (2017) Resistant actors, resistant landscapes? A historical political ecology of a forested conservation object in exurban southeastern Pennsylvania. Landsc Res 42(3):291–306Google Scholar
  52. Hurley PT, Taylor LE (2016) From swamp to ridgeline: Exploring exurbia in southeastern Pennsylvania and the Sierra Nevada foothills of California. In A Comparative Political Ecology of Exurbia (31–49). Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Johns Hopkins University Libraries (2017) Residential Security Map of Baltimore, Maryland. http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/32621 Accessed 5/4/2017
  55. Jorgensen A, Tylecote M (2007) Ambivalent landscapes—wilderness in the urban interstices. Landsc Res 32(4):443–462Google Scholar
  56. Kang W, Minor ES, Park C-R, Lee D (2015) Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities. Urban Ecosyst 18:857–870.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0433-5 Google Scholar
  57. King KL, Locke DH (2013) A comparison of three methods of measuring local urban tree canopy cover. Arboricult Urban For 39(2):62–67Google Scholar
  58. Knigge L, Cope M (2006) Grounded visualization: integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Enviro & Planning A 38(11):2021–2037Google Scholar
  59. Kohn E (2013) How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Univ. of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  60. Konijnendijk CC, Richard RM, Kenney A, Randrup TB (2006) Defining urban forestry—a comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban For Urban Green 4(3–4):93–103Google Scholar
  61. Kosek J (2006) Understories: The political life of forests in New Mexico. Duke Univ Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  62. Kowarik I (2005) Wild urban woodlands: Towards a conceptual framework. In: Kowarik I, Körner S (eds) Wild Urban Woodlands: New perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  63. Kowarik I, Körner S (2005) New perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  64. Lachmund J (2013) Greening Berlin. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  65. Li TM (2014) Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Duke Univ Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  66. Livesley SJ, McPherson EG (2016) Calfapietra C (2016) The urban forest and ecosystem services: Impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and city scale. J Environ Qual 45:119–124.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Loughner CP, Allen DJ, Zhang D-L, Pickering KE, Dickerson RR, Landry L (2012) Roles of urban tree canopy and buildings in urban heat island effects: Parameterization and preliminary results. J Appl Meteorol and Clim 51:1775–1793Google Scholar
  68. Lord C, Norquist K (2010) Cities as emergent systems: Race as a rule in organized complexity. Environ Law 40:551–597Google Scholar
  69. MacFaden SW, O’Neil-Dunne JPM, Royar AR, Lu JWT, Rundle AG (2012) High-resolution tree canopy mapping for New York City using LIDAR and object-based image analysis. J Appl Remote Sensing:6.  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.6.063567
  70. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  71. Neumann RP (2002) Imposing wilderness: Struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. Univ. of Cal Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  72. Ocejo RE (2013) Ethnography and the city: Readings on doing urban fieldwork. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  73. Ogden L (2011) Swamplife: People, gators, and mangroves entangled in the Everglades. Univ. of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  74. Olson SH (1997) Baltimore: The building of an American city. Johns Hopkins, University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  75. O’Neil-Dunne JPM, MacFaden SQ, Royar A (2014) A versatile, production-oriented approach to high-resolution tree-canopy mapping in urban and suburban landscapes using GEOBIA and data fusion. Remote Sens 6(12):12837–12865.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61212837 Google Scholar
  76. Peluso N (1992) Rich forests, poor people: Resource control and resistance in Java. Univ. of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  77. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Review Ecol Syst 32(1):127–157Google Scholar
  78. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Belt KT, Groffman PM, Grove JM, Irwin EG, Kaushal SS, LaDeau SL, Nilon CH, Swan CM, Warren PS (2017) Dynamic heterogeneity: a framework to promote ecological integration and hypothesis generation in urban systems. Urban Ecosyst 20(1):1–14Google Scholar
  79. Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  80. Pietila A (2010) Not in my neighborhood: How bigotry shaped a great American city. Ivan R Dee, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  81. Pincetl S (2012) Nature, urban development and sustainability – What elements are needed for a more comprehensive understanding? Cities 29(2):S32–S37Google Scholar
  82. Pinho P, Correia O, Lecoq M et al (2016) Evaluating green infrastructure in urban environments using a multi-taxa and functional diversity approach. Environ Res 147:601–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.025 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Polsky C, Grove JM, Knudson C et al (2014) Assessing the homogenization of urban land management with an application to US residential lawn care. PNAS 111(12):4432–4437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Power G (1983) Apartheid Baltimore style: The residential segregation ordinances of 1910–1913. Maryland Law Review 42:289–328Google Scholar
  85. Rademacher A (2011) Reigning the river: Urban ecologies and political transformation in Kathmandu. Duke Univ Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  86. Rademacher A (2015) Urban political ecology. Annu Rev Anthropol 44:137–152Google Scholar
  87. Sandberg LA, Bardekjian A, Butt S (2014) Urban forests, trees and greenspace: A political ecology perspective. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  88. Schlager E, Ostrom E (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68(3):249–262Google Scholar
  89. Smith ML, Zhou W, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Band LE (2010) Evaluation of the National Land Cover Database for Hydrologic Applications in Urban and Suburban Baltimore, Maryland. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46(2):429–442.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00412.x Google Scholar
  90. Smith N (1984) Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Univ. of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  91. Swyngedouw E, Heynen N (2003) Urban political ecology, justice, and the politics of scale. Antipode 35(3):898–918Google Scholar
  92. Sze J (2006) Noxious New York: The racial politics of urban health and environmental justice. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  93. Tallis M, Taylor G, Sinnett D, Freer-Smith P (2011) Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments. Landsc Urban Plan 103:129–138Google Scholar
  94. Troy A, Grove JM, O'Neill-Dunne J (2012) The relationship between tree canopy and crime rates across an urban-rural gradient in the greater Baltimore region. Landsc Urban Plan 106:262–270Google Scholar
  95. Troy A, Grove JM (2008) Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landsc Urban Plan 87:233–245Google Scholar
  96. Tsing AL (2005) Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton Univ Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  97. Tsing AL (2015) The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton Univ Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  98. West P (2006) Conservation is our government now: The politics of ecology in Papua New Guinea. Duke Univ Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  99. West P (2012) From modern production to imagined primitive: The social world of coffee from Papua New Guinea. Duke Univ. Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  100. Williams R (1973) The country and the city. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. Willis P (2000) The ethnographic imagination. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  102. Wolcott HF (2008) Ethnography: A way of seeing, 2nd Edition. AltaMira Press, LanthamGoogle Scholar
  103. Yeip R (2015) Baltimore’s demographic divide. Wall Street Journal, published May 1, 2015. http://graphics.wsj.com/baltimore-demographics/
  104. Zhou W, Huang G, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2011) 90 years of forest cover change in the urbanizing Gwynns Falls watershed, Baltimore, Maryland: spatial and temporal dynamics. Landsc Ecol 26:6450659Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura A. Ogden
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carissa Aoki
    • 2
  • J. Morgan Grove
    • 3
  • Nancy Falxa Sonti
    • 3
  • William Hall
    • 4
  • Dexter Locke
    • 4
  • Steward T. A. Pickett
    • 5
  • Miriam Avins
    • 6
  • Katie Lautar
    • 6
  • John Lagrosa
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  2. 2.Ecology, Evolution, Ecosystems & SocietyDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  3. 3.Baltimore Field StationUS Forest ServiceBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC)AnnapolisUSA
  5. 5.Cary Institute of Ecosystem StudiesMillbrookUSA
  6. 6.Baltimore Green SpaceBaltimoreUSA
  7. 7.Center for Urban Research and EducationUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations