Advertisement

The effects of spacing patterns on incidental L2 vocabulary learning through reading with electronic glosses

  • Ahmet ÇekiçEmail author
  • Arif Bakla
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of spacing on L2 incidental vocabulary learning. The participants divided into three groups studied the same 20 target words, which occurred nine times in 36 short reading texts in a Moodle course. The first group read four passages and thus saw each target words once per session each week in the nine-week period (nine sessions, fixed spacing group). The second group (three sessions, spaced massing with fixed intervals) and the third group (three sessions, spaced massing with expanding intervals) studied 12 passages each session and saw each target item three times per session. While the second group studied the passages within a seven-week period with a two-week and a three-week interval (three sessions), the third group studied the passages in three consecutive weeks (three sessions). So, all of the three groups saw the same 20 target words a total of nine times with different massing and spacing patterns. The participants were given the Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (the VKS) before and after the treatment and a multiple-choice test immediately after the treatment period. The results indicated that the fixed spacing group outperformed the spaced massing with fixed intervals and spaced massing with expanding intervals.

Keywords

Incidental vocabulary learning Spaced learning Spaced massing Hypertext glosses EFL 

Notes

Supplementary material

11251_2019_9483_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Acha, J. (2009). The effectiveness of multimedia programmes in children’s vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 23–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00800.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of english as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35, 499–517.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9016-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ariew, R., & Ercetin, G. (2004). Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 237–259.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822042000334253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azari, F. (2012). Review of effects of textual glosses on incidental vocabulary learning. International Journal of Innovative Ideas, 12(2), 13–24.Google Scholar
  5. Boers, F., Warren, P., Grimshaw, G., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2017). On the benefits of multimodal annotations for vocabulary uptake from reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 709–725.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1356335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cakmak, F., & Ercetin, G. (2017). Effects of gloss type on text recall and incidental vocabulary learning in mobile-assisted L2 listening. ReCALL, 30(1), 24–47.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H., & Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 369–378.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1095–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, H. (2002). Investigating the effects of L1 and L2 glosses on foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, C., & Truscott, J. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on ıncidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 693–713.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cobb, T. (n.d.) Compleat Web VPv.2 [Computer software]. https://www.lextutor.ca/vp/comp/
  13. Ertürk, Z. Ü. (2016). The effect of glossing on EFL learners’ ıncidental vocabulary learning in reading. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 373–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goossens, N. A. M. C., Camp, G., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Tabbers, H. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2012). Spreading the words: A spacing effect in vocabulary learning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 965–971.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.722617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heidari-Shahreza, M. A., & Tavakoli, M. (2016). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition by Iranian EFL learners. Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 17–32.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.708051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu, S. M., Vongpumivitch, V., Chang, J. S., & Liou, H. C. (2014). The effects of L1 and L2 e-glosses on incidental vocabulary learning of junior high-school English students. ReCALL, 26(1), 80–99.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobs, G. M., Dufon, P., & Hong, F. C. (1994). L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: Their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading, 17(1), 19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1994.tb00049.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, A., & Heffernan, N. (2006). The short readings project: A CALL reading activity utilizing vocabulary recycling. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 63–77.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220600804046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khoii, R., & Abed, K. F. (2017). Effects of equal spacing, expanding spacing, and massed condition on EFL learners’ receptive and productive vocabulary retrieval. In Pixel, Proceedings of ICT for language learning (10th Ed.) ICT for language learning. (pp. 500–504) 9–10 November, 2017, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  20. Ko, M. H. (2005). Glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2), 125–143.Google Scholar
  21. Ko, M. H. (2012). Glossing and second language vocabulary learning. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 56–79.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kornell, N. (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 23(9), 1297–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, E., & Choe, M.-H. (2014). The effect of spaced repetitions on Korean elementary students’ L2 English vocabulary learning. Studies in English Education, 19(1), 55–75.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, H., & Lee, J. H. (2015). The effects of electronic glossing types on foreign language vocabulary learning: Different types of format and glossary information. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(4), 591–601.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0204-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lotfolahi, A. R., & Salehi, H. (2017). Spacing effects in vocabulary learning: Young EFL learners in focus. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1287391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marefat, H., Rezaee, A. A., & Naserieh, F. (2016). Effect of computerized gloss presentation format on reading comprehension: A cognitive load perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 15, 479–501.  https://doi.org/10.28945/3568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miyasako, N. (2002). Does text-glossing have any effects on incidental vocabulary learning through reading for Japanese senior high school students? Language Education & Technology, 39, 1–20.Google Scholar
  28. Nakata, T. (2006). Implementing optimal spaced learning for English vocabulary learning: Towards improvement of the low-first method derived from the reactivation theory. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(2), 3–18.Google Scholar
  29. Nakata, T. (2008). English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL, 20(1), 3–20.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nakata, T. (2013). Optimising second language vocabulary learning from flashcards. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  31. Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning: Does gradually increasing spacing increase vocabulary learning? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 677–711.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York, NY: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  33. Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 195–224.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226319900203X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Restrepo Ramos, F. D. (2015). Incidental vocabulary learning in second language acquisition: A literature review (Aprendizaje incidental de vocabulario en la adquisición de una segunda lengua: una revisión de literatura). PROFILE: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(1), 157–166.  https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.43957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on ıntermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 589–619.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smolen, P., Zhang, Y., & Byrne, J. H. (2016). The right time to learn: mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(2), 77–88.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snoder, P. (2017). Improving English learners’ productive collocation knowledge: The effects of ınvolvement load, spacing, and ıntentionality. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), 140–164.  https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sobel, H. S., Cepeda, N. J., & Kapler, I. V. (2011). Spacing effects in real-world classroom vocabulary learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 763–767.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Son, L. K., & Simon, D. A. (2012). Distributed learning: Data, metacognition, and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 379–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9206-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waring, R., & Takaki, M. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign language, 15(2), 130–163.Google Scholar
  42. Warschauer, M., & Lee, J. H. (2017). The effects of concordance-based electronic glosses on L2 vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 32–51.Google Scholar
  43. Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46–65.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232–245.Google Scholar
  45. Webb, S., Newton, J., & Chang, A. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63(1), 91–120.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00729.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu, J. (2010). Using multimedia vocabulary annotations in L2 reading and listening activities. Calico Journal, 27(2), 311–327.  https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.311-327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yanguas, I. (2009). Multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning. Language learning & Technology, 13(2), 48–67.Google Scholar
  49. Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 glosses: Their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 85–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Foreign Language Education DepartmentSivas Cumhuriyet UniversitySivasTurkey

Personalised recommendations