Instructional Science

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 489–506 | Cite as

Revisiting learning communities: innovations in theory and practice

  • Yotam HodEmail author
  • Katerine Bielaczyc
  • Dani Ben-Zvi


Research on learning communities has been largely influenced by the sociocultural turn in educational scholarship approximately three decades ago. Here, we present a wider history of research and practice on learning communities as we revisit this highly generative and central topic in the learning sciences. Using this to frame our perspective, we examine several central themes in learning communities by comparing and contrasting four cutting-edge conceptions and innovations. We conclude by asking and providing preliminary answers to three key questions in scholarship on learning communities: (1) Where are the learning and instructional sciences going? (2) Where is education going? (3) Where is the world going? Altogether, this paper can serve as an orientation to the topic of learning communities as research and practice moves forward.


Learning communities Humanistic Sociocultural Spatial turn Sociopolitical History Learning sciences 


  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 825–843.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, M., Järvelä, S., & Andriessen, J. (Eds.). (2013). Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Ballenger, C., & Rosebery, A. S. (2003). What counts as teacher research? Investigating the scientific and mathematical ideas of children from culturally diverse backgrounds. Teachers College Record, 105(2), 297–314.Google Scholar
  5. Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318.Google Scholar
  6. Banks, J., Au, K., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E., Gutiérrez, K., … & Valdes, G. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. The LIFE Center (The Learning in Informal and Formal Environments Center) and the Center for Multicultural Education, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  7. Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver, BC: Tony Bates Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). Using Wiki to promote collaborative learning in statistics education. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. Bereiter, C. (2006). Design research: The way forward. Education Canada, 46(1), 16–19.Google Scholar
  10. Bereiter, C., Cress, U., Fischer, F., Hakkarainen, K., Scardamalia, M., & Vogel, F. (2017). Scripted and unscripted aspects of creative work with knowledge. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, & K. Y. Lim (Eds.), Making a difference: Prioritizing equity and access in CSCL, 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2017) (Vol. 2, pp. 751–757). Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  11. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (2006). Technology as a catalyst for fostering knowledge-creating communities. In A. M. O’Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology (pp. 37–60). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Bransford, J. D., Barron, B., Pea, R., Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., … Sabelli, N. (2006). Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science of learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 19–34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Briskin, A., Erickson, S., Callanan, T., & Ott, J. (2009). The power of collective wisdom: And the trap of collective folly. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–272). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
  18. Carabajal, K., LaPointe, D., & Gunawardena, C. N. (2003). Group development in online learning communities. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 217–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Clegg, T., Norooz, L., Kang, S., Byrne, V., Katzen, M., Valez, R., … & Bonsignore, E. (2017). Live physiological sensing and visualization ecosystems: An activity theory analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2029–2041). ACM.Google Scholar
  20. Coakes, E., & Smith, P. (2007). Developing communities of innovation by identifying innovation champions. The Learning Organization, 14(1), 74–85.Google Scholar
  21. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 175–190.Google Scholar
  22. Collins, A. (2017). What’s worth teaching?: Rethinking curriculum in the age of technology. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  24. Cress, U., Feinkohl, I., Jirschitzka, J., & Kimmerle, J. (2016). Mass collaboration as coevolution of cognitive and social systems. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 85–104). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogical creed. School Journal, 54(3), 77–80.Google Scholar
  26. Dooner, A. M., Mandzuk, D., & Clifton, R. A. (2008). Stages of collaboration and the realities of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 564–574.Google Scholar
  27. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.Google Scholar
  28. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House Incorporated.Google Scholar
  29. Edelson, D., & Reiser, B. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learning: Design challenges and strategies. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 335–354). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Models of learning space: Integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education. Review of Education, 4(2), 149–191.Google Scholar
  31. Erstad, O., & Sefton-Green, J. (Eds.). (2013). Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Fischer, G. (2001). Communities of interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems. In S. Bjørnestad, R. Moe, A. Mørch and A. Opdahl (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (pp. 1–14). Norway: Department of Information Science.Google Scholar
  33. Fish, S. E. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Freeman, A., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., & Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2017 K–12 Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  35. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.Google Scholar
  36. Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.Google Scholar
  37. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. The Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.Google Scholar
  38. Harpaz, Y. (2013). Teaching and learning in a community of thinking: The third model. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  39. Harris, C. I. (1993/1995). Whiteness as property. In K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical race theory (pp. 276–291). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  40. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Mertl, V. (2010). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hill, P. (1985). The rationale for learning communities and learning community models. Paper presented at the inaugural conference on learning communities of the Washington Center for improving the quality of undergraduate education. Olympia, WA.Google Scholar
  42. Hillery, G. A. (1955). Definitions of community: Areas of agreement. Rural Sociology, 20(2), 111–123.Google Scholar
  43. Hod, Y. (2017). Future learning spaces in schools: Concepts and designs from the learning sciences. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(2), 99–109.Google Scholar
  44. Hod, Y., Basil-Shachar, J., & Sagy, O. (2018). The role of productive social failure in fostering creative collaboration: A grounded study exploring a classroom learning community. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Scholar
  45. Hod, Y., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Students negotiating and designing their collaborative learning norms: A group developmental perspective in learning communities. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 578–594.Google Scholar
  46. Hod, Y., & Sagy, O. (2017). Whose culture is it? Modeling the design of authentic learning environments and the cultures they mediate. In Smith, B.K., Borge, M., Mercier, E. and K.Y. Lim (Eds.), Making a difference: Prioritizing equity and access in CSCL, 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) (Vol. 1, pp. 87–94). Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  47. Hod, Y., Charles, E., Bielaczyc, K., Kapur, M., Acosta, A., Ben-Zvi, D., … Zhang, J. (2016). Future learning spaces for learning communities: New directions and conceptual frameworks. In C. K. Looi, J. L. Polman, U. Cress & P. Reimann (Eds.). Transforming learning, empowering learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 2, pp. 1063–1070). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  48. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Isaacs, R. (1999). Differential games: a mathematical theory with applications to warfare and pursuit, control and optimization. Chelmsford: Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
  50. Isaacson, W. (2011). The Man in the Machine. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  51. Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Engaging in science: A feeling for the discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 156–202.Google Scholar
  52. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Kali, Y., Tabak, I., Ben-Zvi, D., Kidron, A., Amzalag, M., Baram-Tsabari, A., … & Kent, C. (2015). Technology-enhanced learning communities on a continuum between ambient to designed: What can we learn by synthesizing multiple research perspectives? In O. Lindwall, P. Koschman, T. Tchounikine and S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: the computer supported collaborative learning conference (CSCL) (Vol. II, pp. 615–622). Gothenburg: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  54. Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83.Google Scholar
  55. Koschmann, T. (1999). The cultural turn. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(1), 127–128.Google Scholar
  56. Lampert, M., Rittenhouse, P., & Crumbaugh, C. (1996). Agreeing to disagree: Developing sociable mathematical discourse. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development (pp. 731–764). Oxford: Blackwell’s Press.Google Scholar
  57. Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107–123.Google Scholar
  58. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394.Google Scholar
  61. Lee, V. R., Yuan, M., Ye, L., & Recker, M. (2016). Reconstructing the influences on and focus of the learning sciences from the field’s published conference proceedings. In M. A. Evans, M. J. Packer, & R. K. Sawyer (Eds.), Reflections on the learning sciences (pp. 105–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Levine, M., Perkins, D. V., & Perkins, D. D. (2005). Principles of community psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Lieberman, M. A., Yalom, I. D., & Miles, M. B. (1973). Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
  64. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Martin, D. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295–338.Google Scholar
  66. McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73–81.Google Scholar
  67. Meier, D. (2003). In schools we trust: Creating communities of learning in an era of testing and standardization. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  68. Meiklejohn, A. (1932). The experimental college. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  69. Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141–144.Google Scholar
  70. Nasir, N. I. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475.Google Scholar
  71. Nelson, A. R. (2001). Education and democracy: The meaning of Alexander Meiklejohn, 1872–1964. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  72. Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345–375.Google Scholar
  73. Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203.Google Scholar
  74. Park, J. Y., Michaels, S., Arancibia, E., Diaz Lembert, D., Dimanche, S., Moon, A., et al. (2017). Poetry Inside Out as multiliteracies pedagogy: An inquiry by youth researchers and university researchers. In F. Serafini & E. Gee (Eds.), Re-imagining multiliteracies: 20 years after the New London Group (pp. 62–73). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  75. Polo, C., Lund, K., Plantin, C., & Niccolai, G. P. (2016). Group emotions: The social and cognitive functions of emotions in argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 123–156.Google Scholar
  76. Powietrzynska, M., & Tobin, K. (Eds.). (2016). Mindfulness and educating citizens for everyday life. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Radinsky, J., Bouillion, L., Lento, E. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Mutual benefit partnership: A curricular design for authenticity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(4), 405–430.Google Scholar
  78. Reddy, M., Jacobs, P., McCrohon, C., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (1998). Creating scientific communities in the elementary classroom. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  79. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  80. Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
  81. Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., et al. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67.Google Scholar
  82. Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  83. Rogers, C. R. (1985). Toward a more human science of the person. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25(4), 7–24.Google Scholar
  84. Rogers, J., Morrell, E., & Enyedy, N. (2007). Studying the struggle: Contexts for learning and identity development for urban youth. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(3), 419–443.Google Scholar
  85. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1(4), 209–229.Google Scholar
  86. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. D. Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Roschelle, J., Martin, W., Ahn, J., & Schank, P. (Eds.). (2017). Cyberlearning community report: The state of cyberlearning and the future of learning with technology. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
  88. Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Salomon, G. (2006). Does peace education really make a difference? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 12(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  90. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Sawyer, K., & Greeno, J. (2006). Situativity and learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 355–367). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.Google Scholar
  93. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.Google Scholar
  94. Scharmer, O., & Kaufer, K. (2014). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-system to eco-system economies. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  95. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  96. Senge, P. M., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2012). Schools that learn (updated and revised): A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  97. Senge, P. M., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2004). Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. Cambridge, MA: SoL.Google Scholar
  98. Sharples, M., & Pea, R. (2014). Mobile learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 501–521). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Shulman, L. S., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Fostering communities of teachers as learners: Disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 135–140.Google Scholar
  100. Stahl, G. (2012). Traversing planes of learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
  101. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change (Vol. 219). Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.Google Scholar
  104. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (2011). Navigating interculturality: African American male students and the science classroom. Journal of African American Males in Education, 2(1), 98–115.Google Scholar
  105. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
  106. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Wuthnow, R. (2009). Communities of discourse: Ideology and social structure in the reformation, the enlightenment, and European socialism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Yablon, Y. (2007). Feeling close from a distance: Peace encounters via internet technology. New Directions for Youth Development, 116, 99–107.Google Scholar
  109. Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.Google Scholar
  110. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.Google Scholar
  111. Zhang, J., Tao, D., Chen, M.-H., Sun, Y., Judson, D., & Naqvi, S. (2018). Co-organizing the collective journey of inquiry with Idea Thread Mapper. Journal of the Learning Sciences. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Clark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations