Advertisement

Cefotaxime pharmacokinetics in Arabian camel (Camelus dromedarius) calves after single intravenous injection

  • Abdullah Altayban
  • Mahmoud KandeelEmail author
  • Amin Tahoun
  • Mohammed Al-Nazawi
Short Communications
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Cefotaxime is a third-generation broad-spectrum cephalosporin acting on a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In this work, the pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime were determined in dromedary camel calves by single intravenous injection of 10 mg/kg b.w. Cefotaxime levels were estimated by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Cefotaxime pharmacokinetics in camel calves obeyed three-compartment kinetics model. There was a central compartment and two peripheral, one shallow and one deep compartment. The shallow compartment equilibrates very rapidly with distribution half-life (t1/2α) of 0.6 min, while the deep compartment has large distribution half-life (t1/2β) of 42 min indicating slower uptake of cefotaxime. The elimination rate constant (γ = 0.04 h−1) and elimination half-life (t1/2 γ) = 15.46 h indicating slow elimination. In comparison with other animals, cefotaxime pharmacokinetics in camel calves showed potential wide distribution in multi-compartment, lower elimination constant, lower clearance and higher volume of distribution at steady state. This indicates substantial differences in cefotaxime pharmacokinetics in camel calves with a very characteristic ultra-rapid distribution into three-compartment and slow elimination.

Keywords

Cefotaxime Camel Pharmacokinetics UPLC-MS/MS Cephalosporins 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

MK, AA and MA designed the experiment; AA performed the experiment; MK, AA and MA analysed the results; MK and AA wrote the manuscript; MK, AA and MA approved the submission and AA, MK, and AT revised the manuscript.

Funding information

The authors acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Faisal University for the financial support under Nashir Track (Grant No. 186253). This work was funded by Deanship of Scientific Research (King Faisal University) under master students projects track (project no. 172029).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All animals procedures were approved by the ethics committee of King Faisal University (approval no. KFU-REC/2018-11-2).

Informed consent

Not applicable to this work.

References

  1. Aboubakr, M., 2016. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in Muscovy ducks. International Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology,4, 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altaher, Y., Kandeel, M., 2016. Molecular analysis of some camel cytochrome P450 enzymes reveals lower evolution and drug-binding properties. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics,34, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altaher, Y., Nakanishi, M., Kandeel, M., 2015. Annotation of camel genome for estimation of drug binding power, evolution and adaption of cytochrome P450 1a2. International Journal of Pharmacology,11, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atef, M., Ramadan, A., Afifi, N., Youssef, S., 1990. Pharmacokinetic profile of cefotaxime in goats. Research in Veterinary Science,49, 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caprile, K.A., 1988. The cephalosporin antimicrobial agents: a comprehensive review. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics,,11, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Datta, B., Mandal, T., Chakraborty, A., 2003. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in goats with experimentally induced kidney damage. Indian Journal of Pharmacology,35, 173–176.Google Scholar
  7. Guerrini, V., Filippich, L., English, P., Bourne, D., 1983. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in sheep. American Journal of Veterinary Research,44, 1488–1491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Guerrini, V., Filippich, L., English, P., Cao, G., Bourne, D., 1985. Effect of probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in sheep. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics,,8, 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guerrini, V., English, P., Filippich, L., Schneider, J., Bourne, D., 1986. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in the dog. The Veterinary Record,119, 81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kandeel, M., Altaher, A., Kitade, Y., Abdelaziz, M., Alnazawi, M., Elshazli, K., 2016. Evolution of camel CYP2E1 and its associated power of binding toxic industrial chemicals and drugs. Computational biology and chemistry,64, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knudsen, J., Fuursted, K., Frimodt-Møller, N., Espersen, F., 1997. Comparison of the effect of cefepime with four cephalosporins against pneumococci with various susceptibilities to penicillin, in vitro and in the mouse peritonitis model. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy,40, 679–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Legrand, T., Vodovar, D., Tournier, N., Khoudour, N., Hulin, A., 2016. Simultaneous Determination of Eight beta-Lactam Antibiotics, Amoxicillin, Cefazolin, Cefepime, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Cloxacillin, Oxacillin, and Piperacillin, in Human Plasma by Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Ultraviolet Detection. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemother,60, 4734–4742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McElroy, D., Ravis, W., Clark, C., 1986. Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime in the domestic cat. American Journal of Veterinary Research,47, 86–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Neu, H.C., 1982. The new beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins. Annals of Internal Medicine,97, 408–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Orsini, J.A., Moate, P., Engiles, J., Norman, T., Poppenga, R., Benson, C., Boston, R., 2004. Cefotaxime kinetics in plasma and synovial fluid following intravenous administration in horses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics,27, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Papich, M.G., 2015. Saunders handbook of veterinary drugs-e-book: small and large animal. Elsevier Health Sciences.Google Scholar
  17. Rule, R., Buschiazzo, H., Rubio, M., Quiroga, G., de Buschiazzd, P., 1994. Pharmacokinetics and penetration into tissue fluid of cefotaxime in bovines. Chemotherapy,40, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sharma, S.K., Srivastava, A.K., 2006. Subcutaneous pharmacokinetics and dosage regimen of cefotaxime in buffalo calves (Bubalus bubalis). Journal of Veterinary Science,7, 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sharma, S., Srivastava, A., Bal, M., 1995. Disposition kinetics and dosage regimen of cefotaxime in cross-bred male calves. Veterinary Research,26, 168–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharma, S., Srivastava, A., Deore, M., 2004. Pharmacokinetic disposition of cefotaxime in buffalo calves (Bubalus bubalis) following single intramuscular administration. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences (India),74, 590–593.Google Scholar
  21. Sumano, H., Gutierrez, L., Ocampo, L., 2004. Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of cefotaxime for the treatment of septicaemia in dogs. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica,52, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, J., Fan, X., Liu, Y., Du, Z., Feng, Y., Jia, L., Zhang, J., 2017. Extraction optimization of sixteen cephalosporins in milk by filtered solid phase extraction and ultra high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Methods,9, 1282–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang, Y., Huo, M., Zhou, J., Xie, S., 2010. PKSolver: An add-in program for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis in Microsoft Excel. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine,99, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary MedicineKing Faisal UniversityAlahsaSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineKafrelshiekh UniversityKafrelshiekhEgypt
  3. 3.Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineKafrelshiekh UniversityKafrelshiekhEgypt

Personalised recommendations