Molecular detection of Treponema species organisms in foremilk and udder cleft skin of dairy cows with digital dermatitis
- 3 Downloads
Identification of reservoirs and transmission routes of digital dermatitis (DD)-associated Treponema spp. is considered an effective means for controlling DD infection in dairy cows. The objective of this study is to identify and characterize the potential reservoir niches for DD-associated Treponema spp. from healthy udder cleft skin and foremilk in lactating dairy cows. A large dairy farm was visited weekly from March to July 2015. Clinical investigation revealed that a total of 25 lame cows had DD lesions located at the plantar aspect of the interdigital cleft. A total of 75 samples, three per cow, were collected including deep swabs from DD lesions (n = 25), non-aseptically collected foremilk samples (n = 25) and skin swabs from udder cleft (n = 25). Treponema spp. were identified using nested PCR assays and confirmed by DNA sequencing. Results revealed that Treponema phagedenis (T. phagedenis)–like was the most identified species in the foremilk 40% (10/25), in comparison with DD lesions and udder cleft skin samples with 32% (8/25) and 20% (5/25), respectively. On the other hand, Treponema pedis (T. pedis) was the most identified species in the udder cleft skin 80% (20/25), in comparison with DD lesions and foremilk samples with 68% (17/25) and 60% (15/25), respectively. None of the examined samples were identified by PCR as containing DNA from Treponema medium (T. medium) or Treponema vincentii (T. vincentii)–like. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report for detection of T. phagedenis–like and T. pedis from healthy skin of udder cleft and foremilk samples. Detection of DD Treponema spp. from udder cleft skin and foremilk samples indicates that these sites could be potential reservoirs for spirochetes involved in DD. Udder cleft skin and foremilk may have a role in transmission routes of DD Treponema in dairy farms.
KeywordsDairy cows Digital dermatitis Treponema Reservoirs Udder cleft
The authors would like to thank the management staff of the farm for their logistic support. Special thanks to the farm workers for their help and patience during animal examination and collection of samples.
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- Beattie, K.G. and Taylor, D.J., 2000. An investigation into intertrigo (necrotic dermatitis or ‘foul udder’) in dairy cows. Cattle Practice, 8, 377–380.Google Scholar
- Clegg, S.R., Carter, S.D., Stewart, J.P., Amin, D.M., Blowey, R.W. and Evans, N.J., 2016a. Bovine ischaemic teat necrosis: a further potential role for digital dermatitis Treponema. Veterinary Record, 178, 71.Google Scholar
- Clegg, S.R., Mansfield, K.G., Newbrook, K., Sullivan, L.E., Blowey, R.W., Carter, S.D. and Evans, N.J., 2015. Isolation of digital dermatitis Treponema from hoof lesions in Wild North American Elk (Cervus elaphus) in Washington State, USA. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 53, 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collighan, R. J., Naylor, R. D., Martin, P. K., Cooly, B. A., Buller, N. and Woodward, M. J., 2000. A spirochete isolated from a case of severe virulent ovine foot disease is closely related to a treponeme isolated from human periodontitis and bovine digital dermatitis. Veterinary Microbiology, 74, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Döpfer, D., Koopmans, A., Meijer, F.A., Szakáll, I., Schukken, Y.H., Klee, W., Bosma, R.B., Cornelisse, J.L., van Asten, A.J. and ter Huurne, A.A., 1997. Histological and bacteriological evaluation of digital dermatitis in cattle, with special reference to Spirochaetes and Campylobacter faecalis. Veterinary Record, 140, 620–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans, N.J., Brown, J.M., Demirkan, I., Singh, P., Getty, B., Timofte, D., Vink, W.D., Murray, R.D., Blowey, R.W., Birtles, R.J., Hart, C.A. and Carter, S.D., 2009. Association of unique, isolated Treponema with bovine digital dermatitis lesions. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 47, 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans, N.J., Timofte, D., Isherwood, D.R., Brown, J.M., Williams, J.M., Sherlock, K., Lehane, M.J., Murray, R.D., Birtles, R.J., Hart, C.A. and Carter, S.D., 2012. Host and environmental reservoirs of infection for bovine digital dermatitis Treponema. Veterinary Microbiology, 156, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keil, D.J., Read, D., Sturgis, T.F. and Bockenstedt, C.R., 2002. Isolation of a (papillomatous) digital dermatitis-associated Treponema spp. from bovine udder lesions. Proc. 83rd Annual Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
- Nascimento, L.V., Mauerwerk, M.T., Dos Santos, C.L., Barros Filho, I.R., Birgel Júnior, E.H., Sotomaior, C.S. Madeira, H. M and Ollhoff, R.D., 2015. Treponema detected in digital dermatitis lesions in Brazilian dairy cattle and possible host reservoirs of infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 53, 1935–1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Mastitis Council. 1999. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis’ National Mastitis Council, Madison.Google Scholar
- Paster, B.J. and Canale-Parola, E., 1982. Physiological diversity of rumen spirochetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 43, 686–693.Google Scholar
- Read, D.H., Keil, D.J. and Bockenstedt, C.R., 2003. Ulcerative mammary dermatitis associated with invasive Treponema spp in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the 36th Western Conference of Veterinary Diagnostic Pathologists: Foreign, Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, 10th–13th October, 2003, P12.Google Scholar
- Rurangirwa, F.R., Dilbeck, P.M., Crawford, T.B., McGuire, T.C. and McElwain, T.F., 1999. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of microorganism WSU 86-1044 from an aborted bovine foetus reveals that it is a member of the order Chlamydiales: proposal of Waddliaceae fam. nov., Waddlia chondrophila gen. nov., sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 49, 577–581.Google Scholar
- Smirbert, R.M., 1984. Genus III Treponema. pp 49–57. In N. R. Krieg and J. G. Holt, Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 1. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
- Stamm, L.V. and Trott, D.J., 2006. Treponema and bovine skin disease: papillomatous digital dermatitis and ulcerative mammary dermatitis. In: Radolf, J.D., Lukehart, S.A. (Eds.), Pathogenic Treponema—Molecular and Cellular Biology. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, 403–420.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, L.E., Clegg, S.R., Angell, J.W., Newbrook, K., Blowey, R.W., Carter, S.D., Bell, J., Duncan, J.S., Grove-White, D.H., Murray, R.D. and Evans, N.J., 2015a. High-level association of bovine digital dermatitis Treponema spp. with contagious ovine digital dermatitis lesions and presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum and Dichelobacter nodosus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 53, 1628–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar