Advertisement

The effects of slaughter weight on chemical composition, physical properties, and fatty acid profile of musculus longissimus dorsi in Holstein bulls

  • Ertuğrul KulEmail author
  • Aziz Şahin
  • Yüksel Aksoy
  • Emre Uğurlutepe
Regular Articles
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of slaughter weight on chemical composition, physical properties, and fatty acid profile of musculus longissimus dorsi (MLD) in Holstein bulls. The bulls (n = 20) were divided into two slaughter weight groups as light (450–520 kg) and heavy (521–580 kg) according to body weights at slaughter. After resecting MLD from the carcass, its chemical composition, physical properties, and fatty acid profile were determined. The analysis showed that fat, ash, and cholesterol contents of MLD were significantly affected by slaughter weight (P < 0.05). Higher fat, ash, and cholesterol contents were determined in heavy bulls compared with light ones. However, the protein and moisture contents were not significantly different between slaughter weight groups in terms of pH, drip loss, and water holding capacity. With regard to meat color, the a* was significantly higher in light bulls; however, the L* and b* values were similar in both slaughter weight groups. Of all fatty acids, only C:10 was found the highest in heavy bulls (P < 0.05). The n-6/n-3 ratio was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in light bulls compared with heavy ones. Consequently, the best results were obtained from light Holstein bulls in order to achieve better beef quality.

Keywords

Holstein bull Slaughter weight Meat quality Musculus longissimus dorsi 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Prof. Dr. Ahmet Şahin for his valuable assistance.

Funding information

This work was financially supported by Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit with project number: PYO-ZRT.4001.14.002.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of ethical approval

The study was approved by Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Local Animal Ethics Committee.

References

  1. Aksoy, Y., Ulutaş, Z., 2016. Meat production traits of local Karayaka sheep in Turkey 1. The meat quality characteristic of lambs. Italian Journal of Food Science, 28(1), 131–138.Google Scholar
  2. Alfaia, C.M., Castro, M.L., Martins, S.I., Portugal, A.P., Alves, S.P., Fontes, C.M., Bessa, R.J., Prates, J.A., 2007. Effect of slaughter season on fatty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid isomers and nutritional value of intramuscular fat in Barrosã-PDO veal. Meat Science 75(1), 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AOAC, 1990. “Official Methods of Analysis” 15th ed. AOAC, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardıclı, S., Dıncel, D., Balcı, F., 2018. Evaluation of slaughter weights and carcass traits of bulls marketed in South Marmara Region of Turkey. Harran University Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 7(1), 45–50.Google Scholar
  5. Barton-Gade, P.A., Demeyer, D., Honikel, K.O., Joseph, R.L., Puolanne, E., Severini, M., Smulders, F., Tonberg, E., 1993. Reference methods for water holding capacity in meat and meat product: procedures recommended by an OECD working group, 39th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, 1–6 August 1993, Calgary, Canada, pp. 02.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, J.J., Warner, R.D., 2007. Ion distribution and protein proteolysis affect water holding capacity of longissimus thoracis et lumborum in meat of lamb subjected to antemortem exercise. Meat Science, 75(3), 406–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruns, K.W., Pritchard, R.H., Boggs, D.L., 2004. The relationship among body weight, body composition, and intramuscular fat content in steers. Journal of Animal Science, 82(5), 1315–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bureš, D., Bartoň, L., 2012. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of bulls and heifers slaughtered at different ages. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Çatıkkaş, E., Koç, A., 2017. Fattening performance, carcass characteristics and beef quality of Holstein–Friesian, Brown–Swiss and Simmental bulls. Journal of Adnan Menderes University Agricultural Faculty, 14(1), 59–64.Google Scholar
  10. Chambaz, A., Scheeder, M.R.L., Kreuzer, M., Dufey, P.A., 2003. Meat quality of Angus, Simmental, Charolais and Limousin steers compared at the same intramuscular fat content. Meat Science, 63(4), 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho, S., Kim, J., Kang, S., Kang, G., Seong, P., Park, K., Ki, K., Kim, H., Kim, C., Park, B., 2012. Physicochemical meat quality and sensory property of Holstein steer beef produced by different fattening periods. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 32(6), 749–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clausen, I., Vestergaard, M., Børsting, C., 2007. Eating quality of meat from young bulls of different ages and fed in three different feeding systems. Proc. 53th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, 5–10 August 2007, Beijing, China, pp. 2.Google Scholar
  13. Costa, P., Roseiro, L.C., Alves, V., Partidário, A. Santos, C., 2006a. Histological profile and Fatty acid composition of Maronesa-PDO veal muscles. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências Veterinárias, 101(557–558), 95–102.Google Scholar
  14. Costa, P., Roseiro, L.C., Partidário, A., Alves, V., Bessa, R.J., Calkins, C.R., Santos, C., 2006b. Influence of slaughter season and sex on fatty acid composition, cholesterol and a-tocopherol contents on different muscles of Barrosa˜-PDO veal. Meat Science, 72(1), 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Smet, S., Webb, E.C., Claeys, E., Uytterhaegen, L., Demeyer, D.I., 2000. Effect of dietary energy and protein levels on fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat in double-muscled Belgian Blue bulls. Meat Science, 56(1), 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duckett, S.K., Wagner, D.G., Yates, L.D., Dolezal, M.G., May, S.G., 1993. Effects of time on feed on beef nutrient composition. Journal of Animal Science, 71(8), 2079–2088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grau, R., Hamm, R., 1956. Die bestimmung der wasserbindung des fleisches mittles der premethode. Fleischwirtsch, 8, 733–736.Google Scholar
  18. Holló, G., Csapó, J., Szűcs, E., Tözsér, J., Repa, I., Holló, I., 2001. Influence of breed, slaughter weight and gender on chemical composition of beef. Part 2. Fatty acid composition of fat in rib samples. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 14(12), 1719–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Humada, M.J., Serrano, E., Sañudo, C., Rolland, D.C., Dugan, M.E.R., 2012. Production system and slaughter age effects on intramuscular fatty acids from young Tudanca bulls. Meat Science, 90(3), 678–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irshad, A., Kandeepan, G., Kumar, S., Ashish Kumar, A., Vishnuraj, M.R., Shukla, V., 2013. Factors influencing carcass composition of livestock: A review. Journal of Animal Production Advances, 3(5), 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeleníková, J., Pipek, P., Mitsuoshi, Miyahara M., 2008. The effects of breed, sex, intramuscular fat and ultimate pH on pork tenderness. European Food Research and Technology, 227(4), 989–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, D.G., Jung, K.K., Sung, S.K., Choi, C.B., Kim, S.K., Kim, D.Y., Choi, B.J., 1996. Effects of age on the carcass characteristics of Hanwoo and Holstein steers. Korean Journal of Animal Science, 38, 268–274.Google Scholar
  23. Lengyel, Z., Husvéth, F., Polgár, P., Szabó, F., Magyar, L., 2003. Fatty acid composition of intramuscular lipids in various muscles of Holstein–Friesian bulls slaughtered at different ages. Meat Science, 65(1), 593–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lukic, M., Ivanovic, J., Starcevic, M., Djordjevic, J., Markovic, R., Baltic, M., 2016. Carcass performance of Simmental and Holstein Friesian beef cattle in Serbia. Meat Technology, 57(2), 95–101.Google Scholar
  25. Maher, S.C., Mullen, A.M., Keane, M.G., Buckley, D.J., Kerry, J.P., Moloney, A.P., 2004. Decreasing variation in the eating quality of beef through homogenous preand post-slaughter management. Meat Science, 67(1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Młynek, K., Elminowska-Wenda, G., Guliński, P., 2006. The relationship between microstructure of Longissimus lumborum muscle and carcass quality of bulls slaughtered at three ages. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 24(1), 57–63.Google Scholar
  27. Moreno, T., Keane, M.G., Noci, F., Moloney, A.P., 2008. Fatty acid composition of M. Longissimus dorsi from Holstein–Friesian steers of New Zealand and European/American descent and from Belgian Blue Holstein–Friesian steers, slaughtered at two weights/ages. Meat Science, 78(3), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nogalski, Z., Wielgosz-Groth, Z., Purwin, C., Nogalska, A., Sobczuk-Szul, M., Winarski, R., Pogorzelska, P., 2014a. The effect of slaughter weight and fattening intensity on changes in carcass fatness in young Holstein-Friesian bulls. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13(1), 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nogalski, Z., Wielgosz-Groth, Z., Purwin, C., Sobczuk-Szul, M., Mochol, M., Pogorzelska-Przybyłek, P., Winarski, R., 2014b. Effect of slaughter weight on the carcass value of young crossbred (‘Polish Holstein Friesian’ × ‘Limousin’) steers and bulls. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 74(1), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nogalski, Z., Pogorzelska-Przybyłek, P., Sobczuk-Szul, M., Nogalska, A., Modzelewska-Kapituła, M., Purwin, C., 2018. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of bulls and steers slaughtered at two different ages. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 17(2), 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Okeudo, N.J., Moss, B.W., 2007. Intramuscular lipid ant fatty acid profile of sheep comprising four sex-types and seven slaughter weights produced following commercial procedure. Meat Science, 76(2), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oler, A., Głowińska, B., Młynek, K., 2015. Slaughter and carcass characteristics, chemical composition and physical properties of longissimus lumborum muscle of heifers as related to marbling class. Archives Animal Breeding, 58(1), 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pogorzelska-Przybyłek, P., Nogalski, Z., Sobczuk-Szul, M., Purwin, C., Kubiak, D., 2018. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of Holstein-Friesian x Hereford cattle of different sex categories and slaughter ages. Archives Animal Breeding, 61(2), 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramirez, R., Cava, R., 2007. Carcass composition and meat quality of three different Iberian x Duroc genotype pigs. Meat Science, 75(3), 388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rudel, L.L., Morris, M.D., 1973. Determination of cholesterol using o-phthalaldehyde. Journal of Lipid Research, 14(3), 364–366.Google Scholar
  36. Stanley, J.C., Elsom, R.L., Calder, P.C., Griffin, B.A., Harris, W.S., Jebb, S.A., 2007. UK Food Standards Agency Workshop Report: The effects of the dietary n-6:n-3 fatty acid ratio on cardiovascular health. British Journal of Nutrition, 98(6), 1305–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. TSI. 1987. “Turkish Standards Institute” TS 52737 Butchery Animals-Rules for Slaughtering and Carcass Preparation, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  38. Ustuner, H., Yalcintan, H., Orman, A., Ardicli, S., Ekiz, B., Gencoglu, H., Kandazoglu, O., 2017. Effects of initial fattening age on carcass characteristics and meat quality in Simmental bulls imported from Austria to Turkey. South African Journal of Animal Science, 47(2), 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vieira, C., Garcia, M.D., Cerdeno, A., Mantecon, A.R., 2005. Effect of diet composition and slaughter weight on animal performance, carcass and meat quality, and fatty acid composition in veal calves. Livestock Production Science, 93(3), 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Węglarz, A., 2010. Quality of beef from Polish Holstein-Friesian bulls as related to weight at slaughter. Annals of Animal Science, 10(4), 467–476.Google Scholar
  41. Zawadzki, F., Rivaroli, D.C., Fugita, C.A., Valero, M.V., Do Prado, R.M., Jorge, A.M., Do Prado, I.N., 2015. Effect of the body weight on chemical and fatty acids composition of the longissimus muscle from young bulls, 61st International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, 23–28 August 2015, Clermont-Ferrand, France, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of Kırşehir Ahi EvranKırşehirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Animal Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of Eskisehir OsmangaziEskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations