Advertisement

Energy to protein ratios in supplements for grazing heifers in the rainy season

  • Alyce Raiana Monteiro dos SantosEmail author
  • Carla Heloísa Avelino Cabral
  • Carlos Eduardo Avelino Cabral
  • Lívia Vieira de Barros
  • Jackelliny Melo de Barros
  • Welton Batista Cabral
  • Milene Rodrigues Dias
Regular Articles
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of energy and protein supplementation on the nutritional characteristics, ingestive behavior, and productive performance in grazing heifers during the rainy season. Forty crossbred heifers (Nelore breed predominance) were used in the study, with an age of 14 months and an initial mean weight of 182 ± 1.13 kg. The treatments consisted of mineral supplementation ad libitum (control) and three supplements formulated to contain an energy: protein ratio (TDN:CP) of 1.13, 2.62, and 4.06; these were denominated as low (LC, 0.5 kg animal d−1), medium (MC, 1.0 kg animal d−1), and high consumption (HC, 1.5 kg animal d−1), respectively, in order to guarantee an intake of 300 g of crude protein (CP) animal−1 d −1, with variation in energy content. There was a difference (P < 0.05) in crude protein intake, with a 44% reduction for the LC treatment in relation to HC. The lowest grazing time (398 min) was observed with the MC treatment. Urinary urea-N (UreaN) was lower for control animals (P < 0.05). Average daily gain (ADG) was lower for the control animals than for the supplemented animals (P < 0.05); there was no difference in ADG between the animals receiving supplementation. High supplementation levels and TDN:CP ratios are not recommended because they do not justify the increased costs of supplementation. Therefore, when forage presents great nutritional characteristics, it is possible to optimize the performance of the animals with low to medium consumption supplementation.

Keywords

Ingestive behavior Nutritional characteristics Performance Ruminant nutrition 

Notes

Funding information

The authors thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for their financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statements of animal rights

The management and care of the animals was conducted according to the guidelines and recommendations of the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals (CIOMS), Geneva, 1985. All procedures were approved by the Federal University of Mato Grosso (register no. 63/2014), Rondonópolis, Brazil.

References

  1. Almeida, D.M., Marcondes, M.I., Rennó, L.N., Martins, L.S., Villadiego, F.A.C. and Paulino, M.F., 2018. Soybean grain is a suitable replacement with soybean meal in multiple supplements for Nellore heifers grazing tropical pastures. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 50, 1843–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbosa, A.M., Valadares, R.F.D., Valadares Filho, S.C., Pina, D.S., Detmann, E. and Leão, M.I., 2011. Endogenous fraction and urinary recovery of purine derivatives obtained by different methods in Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 89, 510–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barros, L.V., Paulino, M.F., Valadares Filho, S.C., Detmann, E., Silva, F.G., Valente, E.E.L., Lopes, S.A. and Martins, L.S., 2011. Replacement of soybean meal by cottonseed meal 38% in multiple supplements for grazing beef heifers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40, 852–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barros, L.V., Paulino, M.F., Moraes, E.H.B.K., Valadares Filho, S.C., Martins, L.S., Almeida, D.M., Valente, E.E.L., Cabral, C.H.A., Lopes, S.A. and Silva, A.G., 2015. Níveis crescentes de proteína bruta em suplementos múltiplos para novilhas de corte sob pastejo no período das águas. Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, 36, 1583–1598Google Scholar
  5. Batista, E.D., Detmann, E., Titgemeyer, E.C., Valadares Filho, S.C., Valadares, R.F.D., Prates, L.L., Rennó, L.N. and Paulino, M.F., 2016. Effects of varying ruminally undegradable protein supplementation on forage digestion, nitrogen metabolism, and urea kinetics in nellore cattle fed low-quality tropical forage. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabral, C.H.A., Bauer, M.O., Cabral, C.E.A., Souza, A.L. and Benez, F.M., 2011. Comportamento ingestivo diurno de novilhos suplementados no período das águas. Revista Caatinga, 24, 178–185Google Scholar
  7. Cabral, C.H.A, Paulino, M., Detmann, E., Valente, É.E.L., Barros, L.V. and Cabral, C.E.A., 2014. Levels of supplementation for grazing pregnant beef heifers. Bioscience Journal, 30, 226–234Google Scholar
  8. Carvalho, V.V., Paulino, M.F., Detmann, E., Chizzotti, M.L., Martins, L.S., Silva, A.G., Lopes, S.A. and Moura, F.H., 2017. Effects of supplements containing different additives on nutritional and productive performance of beef cattle grazing tropical grass. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 49, 983–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, X.B., Gomes, M.J., 1992. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives – An overview of technical details. International Feed Research Unit, Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa e Silva, L.F., Valadares Filho, S.C., Chizzotti, M.L., Rotta, P.P., Prados, L.F., Valadares, R.F.D., Zanetti, D. and Braga, J.M.S., 2012. Creatinine excretion and relationship with body weight of Nellore cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41, 807–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Detmann, E., Paulino, M.F., Zervoudakis, J.T., Valadares Filho, S.C., Euclydes, R.F., Lana, R.P. and Queiroz, D.S. de, 2001. Cromo e indicadores internos na determinação do consumo de novilhos mestiços, suplementados, a pasto. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 30, 1600–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Detmann, E., Paulino, M.F., Valadares Filho, S.C. and Huhtanen, P., 2014a. Nutritional aspects applied to grazing cattle in the tropics: A review based on Brazilian results. Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, 35, 2829–2854Google Scholar
  13. Detmann, E., Valente, É.E.L., Batista, E.D. and Huhtanen, P., 2014b. An evaluation of the performance and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle fed tropical grass pastures with supplementation. Livestock Science, 162, 141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franco, M.O., Detmann, E., Valadares Filho, S.C., Batista, E.D., Rufino, L.M.A., Barbosa, M.M. and Lopes, A.R., 2017. Intake, digestibility, and rumen and metabolic characteristics of cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogen and different levels of starch. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30, 797–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaspar, A.O., Brumatti, R.C., Dias, A.M. and Arruda, L.A., 2017. Bioeconomic simulation of productive systems in beef cattle production activities which emphasis in maintenance and pasture recovery. Archivos de Zootecnia, 66, 485–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geremia, E.V., Crestani, S., Mascheroni, J.D.C., Carnevalli, R.A., Mourão, G.B. and da Silva, S.C., 2018. Sward structure and herbage intake of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Piatã in a crop-livestock-forestry integration area. Livestock Science, 212, 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodgson, J., 1990. Grazing management: science into pratice, (New York: John Wiley)Google Scholar
  18. Jin, D., Zhao, S., Zheng, N., Beckers, Y. and Wang, J., 2018. Urea metabolism and regulation by rumen bacterial Urease in ruminants – a review. Annals of Animal Science, 18, 303–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lazzarini, I., Detmann, E., Sampaio, C.B., Paulino, M.F., Valadares Filho, S.C., Souza, M.A.D. and Oliveira, F.., 2009. Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 38, 560–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lazzarini, Í., Detmann, E., Valadares Filho, S.C., Paulino, M.F., Batista, E.D., Rufino, L.M.A., Reis, W.L.S. and Franco, M.O., 2016. Nutritional performance of cattle grazing during rainy season with nitrogen and starch supplementation. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 29, 1120–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marcuzzo, F.F.N., Oliveira, N.L., Cardoso, M.R.D., 2012. Trend in Number of Days of Precipitation in the State of Mato Grosso. Ciência e Natura, 34, 59–82Google Scholar
  22. Martha Júnior, G.B., Vilela, L. and Sousa, D.M.G., 2007. Cerrado: uso eficiente de corretivos e fertilizantes em pastagens, 1st ed. (Embrapa Cerrados: Planaltina, DF)Google Scholar
  23. McLennan, S.R., Bolam, M.J., Kidd, J.F., Chandra, K.A. and Poppi, D.P., 2017. Responses to various protein and energy supplements by steers fed low-quality tropical hay. 1. Comparison of response surfaces for young steers. Animal Production Science, 57, 473–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mertens, D.R., 2002. Gravimetric Determination of Amylase-Treated Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds with Refluxing in Beakers or Crucibles: Collaborative Study. Journal of AOAC International, 85, 1217–1240Google Scholar
  25. Minson, D.J., 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. 1st ed. Academic Press, San DiegoMinson, D.J., 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. 1st ed. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  26. Miorin, R.L., Saad, R.M., Silva, L.D.F., Galbeiro, S., Cecato, U. and Massaro Junior, F.L., 2016. The effects of energy and protein supplementation strategy and frequency on the performance of beef cattle that grazed on Tanzania grass pastures during the rainy season. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48, 1561–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neves, D.S.B., Silva, R.R., Ferreira, F.S., Santos, L.V., Filho, G.A., Souza, S.O., Santos, M.C., Rocha, W.J., Silva, A.P.G., Lisboa, M.M., Pereira, M.M.S. and Carvalho, V.M., 2018. Increasing levels of supplementation for crossbred steers on pasture during the dry period of the year. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 50, 1411–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pereira Junior, W.A., Paulino, M.F., Zervoudakis, J.T., Paulino, P.V.R., Da Silva-Marques, R.P., Neto, A.J., França, D. and Hatamoto-Zervoudakis, L.K., 2016. Performance and economic viability of protein supplementation for grazing cattle steers in the wet and dry-wet transition season. Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, 37, 357–368Google Scholar
  29. Poppi, D.P., Quigley, S.P., Silva, T.A.C.C. and Mclennan, S.R., 2018. Challenges of beef cattle production from tropical pastures. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 47, 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rocha, T.C., Fontes, C.A.A., Silva, R.T.S., Processi, E.F., do Valle, F.R.A.F., Lombardi, C.T., Oliveira, R.L. and Bezerra, L.R., 2016. Performance, nitrogen balance and microbial efficiency of beef cattle under concentrate supplementation strategies in intensive management of a tropical pasture. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48, 673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sampaio, C.B., Detmann, E., Lazzarini, I., Souza, M.A., Paulino, M.F. and Valadares Filho, S.C., 2009. Rumen dynamics of neutral detergent fiber in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 38, 560–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Satter, L.D. and Slyter, L.L., 1973. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition, 32, 199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Silva, D.J., Queiroz, A.C., 2002. Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. 3rd ed. UFV, ViçosaGoogle Scholar
  34. Stivanin, S.C.B., Rocha, M.G., Pötter, L., Hampel, V.S., Oliveira, R.A. and Bergoli, T.L., 2014. Ingestive behavior of hoggets given different types of supplement on ryegrass pasture. Acta Scientiarum, 36, 101–107Google Scholar
  35. Titgemeyer, E.C., Armendariz, C.K., Bindel, D.J., Greenwood, R.H. and Löest, C.A., 2001. Evaluation of titanium dioxide as a digestibility marker for cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 79, 1059–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutrition ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Valadares, R.F.D., Gonçalves, L.C., Rodriguez, N.A., Valadares Filho, S.C. and Sampaio, I.., 1997. Níveis de Proteína em Dietas de Bovino. 4. Concentrações de Amônia Ruminal e Uréia Plasmática e Excreções de Uréia e Creatinina. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 26, 1270–1278Google Scholar
  38. Valadares, R.F.D., Broderick, G.A., Valadares Filho, S.C. and Clayton, M.K., 1999. Effect of Replacing Alfalfa Silage with High Moisture Corn on Ruminal Protein Synthesis Estimated from Excretion of Total Purine Derivatives. Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 2686–2696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valente, T.N.P., Detmann, E., Valadares Filho, S.C., Cunha, M., Queiroz, A.C. and Sampaio, C.B., 2011. In situ estimation of indigestible compounds contents in cattle feed and feces using bags made from different textiles. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40, 666–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams, C.H., David, D.J. and Iismaa, O., 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 59, 381–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alyce Raiana Monteiro dos Santos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carla Heloísa Avelino Cabral
    • 2
  • Carlos Eduardo Avelino Cabral
    • 2
  • Lívia Vieira de Barros
    • 1
  • Jackelliny Melo de Barros
    • 2
  • Welton Batista Cabral
    • 2
  • Milene Rodrigues Dias
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculdade de Agronomia e ZootecniaUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoCuiabáBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e TecnológicasUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoRondonópolisBrazil
  3. 3.Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e AmbientaisUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoSinopBrazil

Personalised recommendations