Advertisement

Utilization of live body weight, measurements, and eye muscle components to predict carcass performance of fattened Egyptian male buffalo calves

  • A. M. A. RashadEmail author
  • Dalia K. EL-Hedainy
  • A. E. Mahdy
  • A. E. Badran
  • A. S. A. El-Barbary
Regular Articles
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Carcass performance of 12 fattened male buffalo calves equally grouped by slaughter weights of 300, 350, 400, and 450 kg was evaluated. Six parameters of body measurements such as chest girth, height at withers, body length, body depth, width at pin bones, and diagonal body length were recorded for each calf immediately before slaughter to test their relationships with live body weight, carcass weight (hot and cold) and its components (head, legs, liver, heart, etc.), and eye muscle area at the 10th–13th ribs. Boneless meat and bones formed 36.6 to 39.0% and 9.3 to 11.0% of live weight, respectively. Chest girth had strong correlation with all carcass traits except bone weight and was the best predictor of boneless meat and carcass fat weights (R2 = 0.90, 0.78). The slaughter weight and height at withers and the 10th–13th rib fat weight were the best predictors of hot and cold carcass (R2 ≥ 97.0), carcass bones (R2 = 76%), and hot and cold carcass (R2 = 85.0, 86.5%) weights, respectively.

Keywords

Buffalo calves Body measurements Carcass performance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the staff members of the Feeds and Fattening Unit belonging to Alexandria University, Egypt, for their assistance throughout the work of this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. Also, the study was conducted in a manner that avoided unnecessary discomfort to the animals by the use of proper management.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abo El-Makarm H. A.M , 2003. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of camels and buffaloes. Ph.D. Thesis, Cairo University, Egypt.Google Scholar
  2. Afolayan, R.A., Deland, M.P.B., Rutley, D.L., Bottema, C.D.K., Ewers, A.L., Ponzoni, R.W. and Pitchford, W.S., 2002. Prediction of carcass meat, fat and bone yield across diverse cattle genotype using live-animal measurements. The Australian Society of Animal Production, 24, 13–16.Google Scholar
  3. Aksoy, A.R., Kirmizibayrak, T. and Saatcü, M., 2006. The effect of age on slaughter and carcass characteristics in male Zavot cattle. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 30, 527–532.Google Scholar
  4. Amsa, 2001a. Grading/classification. in: meat evaluation handbook. USA: American Meat Science Association, USA, 9–11.Google Scholar
  5. Amsa, 2001b. Retail cutevaluation. in: meatevaluation handbook. USA: American Meat Science Association, USA, 12–14.Google Scholar
  6. Bergen, R., Miller, S.P., Wilton, J.W., Crews Jr., D.H. and Mandell, I.B., 2006. Genetic correlations between live yearling bull and steer carcass traits adjusted to different slaughter end points 1. Carcass lean percentage. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 546–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casa, E. and Cundiff, L.V., 2006. Post weaning growth and carcass traits crossbred cattle from Hereford, Angus, Norwegian Red, Swedish Red and White, Friesian, and Wagyu maternal grandsires. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chashnidel, Y., Pirsaraei, Z.A. and Elahi, M.Y., 2007. Comparison of daily weight gain and fattening characteristics between buffalo and Holstein male calves with different diets. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 6, 1199–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choat, W.T., Paterson, J.A., Rainey, B.M., King, M.C., Smith, G.C., Belk, K. E. and Lipsey, R.J., 2006. The effects of cattle sex on carcass characteristics and longissimus muscle palatability. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 1820–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Desta, T.T., 2012. Introduction of domestic buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) into Ethiopia would be feasible. Re-newable Agriculture and Food Systems, 27, 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dolezal, H.G. and Hilton, G.G., 2010. Beef carcass grading. in: meat grading and selection (13th ed.) USA: Oklahoma State University, USA, 4–25.Google Scholar
  12. FASS (Federation of Animal Science Societies), 2010. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching. 3rd ed., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  13. Greiner, S.P., Rouse, G.H., Wilson, D.E., Cundiff, L.V. and Wheeler, T.L., 2003. Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live animal measures. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 466–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hankins, O.G. and Howe, P.E., 1946. Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts. Technical Bulletin, United States Department of Agriculture - USDA, Washington, D.C., USA. 926, 1–19.Google Scholar
  15. Haryoko, I. and Suparman, P., 2009. Evaluation of carcass production of Po cattle based on heart girth measurement, body condition score and slaughter weight. Animal Production, 11, 28–33.Google Scholar
  16. Holloway, J.W., Savell, J.W., Hamby, P.L., Baker, J.F. and Stouffer, J. R., 1990. Relationships of empty-body composition and fat distribution to live animal and carcass measurements in Bos indicus-Bos taurus crossbred cows. Journal of Animal Science, 68, 1818–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kandeepan, G., Biswas, S. and Rajkumar, R.S., 2009. Buffalo as a potential food animal. International Journal of Livestock Production, 1, 001–005.Google Scholar
  18. Khasrad and Ningrat, R.W.S., 2010. Improving carcass quality of indigenous cattle of West Sumatera fed local feed resources. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9, 822–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahmoudzadeh, H., Fazaeli, H., Kordnejad, I. and Mirzaei, H.R., 2007. Response of male buffalo calves to different levels of energy and protein in finishing diets. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10, 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manafiazar, G., Mohsenourazary, A., Afsharihamidi, B. and Mahmoodi, B., 2007. Comparison carcass traits of Azeri buffalo, native and crossbred (native * Holstein) male calves in west Azerbaijan-Iran. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 6, 1167–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neath, K.E.A.N., Del Barrio, R.M., Lapitan, J.R. and Herrera, L.C., 2007. Difference in tenderness and pH decline between buffalo and beef during post mortem aging. Meat Science,75, 499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nephawe, K.A., Cundiff, L.V., Dikeman, M.E., Crouse, J.D. and Van Vleck, L.D., 2004. Genetic relationships between sex-specific traits in beef cattle: Mature weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height and body condition score of cows, and carcass traits of their steer relatives. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 647–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. NRC (National Research Council), 2001. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. OlivaÂn, M., Martõnez, A., Garcõa, P., Noval, G. and Osoro, K., 2001. Estimation of the carcass composition of yearling bulls of “Asturiana de los Valles” breed from the dissection of a rib joint. Meat Science, 57, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ong, S.Q., Lee, B.B., Tan, G.P. and Maniam, S., 2017. Capacity of black soldier fly and house fly larvae in treating the wasted rice in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agricultural, 1, 08–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qing, L., Youwen, W., Liqin, T., Jing, L., Qiongfen, L., Shuai, T., Siyuan, S., Chengming, D., Wen, L. and Huaming, M., 2018. Effects of age on slaughter performance and meat quality of Binlangjang male buffalo. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 25, 248–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ranjhan, S.K., 2013. Latest concepts in rearing buffaloes for meat production. Buffalo Bulletin, 32, 319–328.Google Scholar
  28. Rodas-González, A., Juàrez, M., Robertson, W.M., Larsen, I.L. and Aalhus J.L., 2013. Characterization of Canadian grade standards and lean yield prediction for cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 93, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. SAS (Statistical Analysis System User’s Guide), 2004. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, version 9. North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Soeparno., 1992. Ilmu dan teknologi daging. Gajah mada university press. Yogyakarta.Google Scholar
  31. Spanghero, M., Gracco, L., Valusso, R. and Piasentier, E., 2004. In vivo performance, slaughtering traits and meat quality of bovine (Italian Simmental) and buffalo (Italian Mediterranean) bulls. Livestock Production Science, 91, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Suryadi., 2003. The effect of slaughter weight on the main pieces and the crumbs of carcass of Brahman cross cattle. The Scientific Magazine of Livestock, 6, 100–104.Google Scholar
  33. Tatum, J.D., Dolezal, H.G., Williams Jr., F.L., Bowling, R.A. and Taylor, R.E., 1986. Effects of feeder-cattle frame size and muscle thickness on subsequent growth and carcass development. II. Absolute growth and associated changes in carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science, 62,121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tennant, C.J., Spitzer, J.C., Bridges Jr., W.C. and Hampton, J.H., 2002. Weight necessary to change body composition scores in angus cows. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 2031–2035.Google Scholar
  35. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2018. Livestock and products annual 2018; Egyptian beef prices stable, consumption and imports to rise in 2019. GAIN report number: EG-18021, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Yusnayeti., 1986. Hubungan antara luas udamaru dan tebal lemak punggung terhadap persentase karkas sapi. Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Andalas.Google Scholar
  37. Zorrilla-Ríos, J.M., Lancaster, P.A., Goad, C.L. and Carrasco, D.M., 2013. Applicability of prediction equations for cutability in beef carcasses in Jalisco. Mexico, Revista Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria, 17, 119–134.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby)Alexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt

Personalised recommendations