Physicochemical characteristics of dry aged beef from younger Nellore bulls slaughtered at different body weights

  • Rodrigo Augusto Cortêz PassettiEmail author
  • Ivanor Nunes do Prado
  • Francisco de Assis Fonseca de Macedo
  • Alfredo Jorge Costa Teixeira
  • Claudia Andréa Lima Cardoso
  • Gladston Rafael de Arruda Santos
  • Camilo Azevedo Santos
Short Communications


Reducing slaughter age can improve meat quality and reduce costs, while an ageing process can result in more standardized products. Thus, the objective of this paper was to measure the physicochemical characteristics of dry aged meat from younger Nellore bulls slaughtered at different body weights. Twenty-four Longissimus thoracis from young bulls (14 months of age) finished in a feedlot at body weights of 350, 400 and 450 kg were used. From each group (N = 8), samples were divided into three portions for 0, 14 and 28 days of dry ageing. After the samples reached their dry aged period weight, pH and colour were measured. Next, water losses, shear force, the chemical composition and the fatty acids profile of the meat were measured. Reducing slaughter weight (350 kg) of young bulls did not affect meat tenderness but increased saturated fatty acids contents at day 1 of dry ageing. During the dry ageing process, drip loss increased, but thawing losses were reduced. Colour parameter was reduced by dry ageing and meat becomes darker, but meat tenderness was increased. Dry ageing increased the ash content. Dry ageing increased saturated fatty acid and reduced the monounsaturated and saturated fatty acid ratio (MUFA/SFA), but did not change the polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nellore young bulls (14 months) can be slaughtered with 400 or 450 kg without compromising physicochemical characteristics, while dry ageing improved meat tenderness but increased saturated fatty acids and changed meat colour.


Colour Meat quality Tenderness Zebu 



The authors would like to thank the livestock enterprises that support us: the Oiteiros Farm for providing the animals used in the research and the Santa Cruz Farm owners for yielding the feedlot area to carry out the experiment.

The authors thank Timothy Schwinghamer, Agricultural Research Biostatistician from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, for his contributions to the statistical analyses.


The current project was funded by the Brazilian Council for Research and Technological Development (CNPq, process number 401458/2014-8). Trade names or commercial products in this publication are mentioned solely for the purpose of providing specific information and do not imply recommendations or endorsement by the Department of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.

Compliance with ethical standards

Animals were cared for in accordance with acceptable practices and experimental protocols reviewed and approved by Animal Ethics Committee at the Federal University of Sergipe (protocol n° 04/2016).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. Beam, T.M. et al., 2000. Effects of amount and source of fat on the rates of lipolysis and biohydrogenation of fatty acids in ruminal contents, Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 2564–2573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardes, M.M. et al., 2007. Carnes PSE (Pale, Soft, Exudative) e DFD (Dark, Firm, Dry) em lombo suíno numa linha de abate industrial, Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 27,Google Scholar
  3. Bligh, E.G., and Dyer, W.J., 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification, Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 37, 911–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. da Silva-Marques, R.P. et al., 2018. Effects of protein-energetic supplementation frequency on growth performance and nutritional characteristics of grazing beef cattle, Tropical animal health and production, 50, 495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eiras, C.E. et al., 2014. Glycerine levels in the diets of crossbred bulls finished in feedlot: Carcass characteristics and meat quality, Meat Science, 96, 930–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Faustman, C., and Cassens, R.G., 1990. The biochemical basis for discoloration in fresh meat: a review, Journal of Muscle Foods, 1, 217–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grunert, K.G., Bredahl, L., and Brunsø, K., 2004. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector—a review, Meat Science, 66, 259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huff-Lonergan, E., and Lonergan, S.M., 2005. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes, Meat Science, 71, 194–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hulánková, R. et al., 2018. The effect of dry aging on instrumental, chemical and microbiological parameters of organic beef loin muscle, LWT-Food Science and Technology, 89, 559–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ISO, 2000. Animal and Vegetable Fats and Oils—Preparation of Methyl Esters of Fatty Acids. In: I.O.f. Standardization (ed), ISO 5509, 2000, (International Organization for Standardization,Google Scholar
  11. Jiménez-Colmenero, F., Carballo, J., and Cofrades, S., 2001. Healthier meat and meat products: their role as functional foods, Meat Science, 59, 5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Katan, M.B., Zock, P.L., and Mensink, R.P., 1994. Effects of fats and fatty acids on blood lipids in humans: an overview, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60, 1017S–1022SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, Y.H., Kemp, R., and Samuelsson, L.M., 2016. Effects of dry-aging on meat quality attributes and metabolite profiles of beef loins, Meat Science, 111, 168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, Y.H.B. et al., 2017. Effects of stepwise dry/wet-aging and freezing on meat quality of beef loins, Meat Science, 123, 57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawrie, R.A., Marcos, B., and Asuncion, E.Q., 2005. Ciencia de la carne, (Artmed, Spain)Google Scholar
  16. Luchiari, A.F., 2000. Pecuária da carne bovina, São Paulo: A. Luchiari Filho,Google Scholar
  17. Maher, S.C. et al., 2004. Variation in the eating quality of M. longissimus dorsi from Holstein–Friesian bulls and steers of New Zealand and European/American descent, and Belgian Blue x Holstein–Friesians, slaughtered at two weights, Livestock Production Science, 90, 271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mancini, R.A., and Hunt, M.C., 2005. Current research in meat color, Meat Science, 71, 100–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Monteschio, J.O. et al., 2017. Clove and rosemary essential oils and encapsuled active principles (eugenol, thymol and vanillin blend) on meat quality of feedlot-finished heifers, Meat Science, 130, 50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moreno-Indias, I. et al., 2011. Differences on meat quality of local cattle breed from outermost EU zone vs. commercial, Journal of Applied Animal Research, 39, 328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nassu, R. et al., 2017. Effect of the genetic group, production system and sex on the meat quality and sensory traits of beef from crossbred animals, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 49, 1289–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ornaghi, M.G. et al., 2017. Essential oils in the diet of young bulls: Effect on animal performance, digestibility, temperament, feeding behaviour and carcass characteristics, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 234, 274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Owens, F.N. et al., 1995. Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle, Journal of Animal Science, 73, 3152–3172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pedersen, D.K. et al., 2003. Early prediction of water-holding capacity in meat by multivariate vibrational spectroscopy, Meat Science, 65, 581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perry, N., 2012. Dry aging beef, International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 1, 78–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rotta, P.P. et al., 2009. The effects of genetic groups, nutrition, finishing systems and gender of Brazilian cattle on carcass characteristics and beef composition and appearance: a review, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 22, 1718–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Savell, J.W., Mueller, S.L., and Baird, B.E., 2005. The chilling of carcasses, Meat Science, 70, 449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shackelford, S.D. et al., 1991. An evaluation of tenderness of the longissimus muscle of Angus by Hereford versus Brahman crossbred heifers, Journal of Animal Science, 69, 171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Warren, K.E., and Kastner, C.L., 1992. A comparison of dry-aged and vacuum-aged beef strip loins, Journal of Muscle Foods, 3, 151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wheeler, T.L. et al., 1997. A comparison of Warner-Bratzler shear force assessment within and among institutions, Journal of Animal Science, 75, 2423–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wulf, D.M. et al., 1996. Effects of animal age, marbling score, calpastatin activity, subprimal cut, calcium injection, and degree of doneness on the palatability of steaks from limousin steers, Journal of Animal Science, 74, 569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodrigo Augusto Cortêz Passetti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ivanor Nunes do Prado
    • 1
  • Francisco de Assis Fonseca de Macedo
    • 2
  • Alfredo Jorge Costa Teixeira
    • 3
  • Claudia Andréa Lima Cardoso
    • 4
  • Gladston Rafael de Arruda Santos
    • 2
  • Camilo Azevedo Santos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceState University of MaringáMaringáBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Animal ScienceFederal University of SergipeAracajuBrazil
  3. 3.Polytechnic Institute of BragançaBragançaPortugal
  4. 4.Department of ChemistryState University of Mato Grosso do SulDouradosBrazil

Personalised recommendations