Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 51, Issue 8, pp 2361–2370 | Cite as

Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Brucella isolates from the Republic of Kazakhstan

  • Bolat A. Yespembetov
  • Nazym S. SyrymEmail author
  • Nadezhda N. Zinina
  • Makhpal K. Sarmykova
  • Gulshat M. Konbayeva
  • Sovetzhan Z. Basybekov
  • Assiya K. Mussayeva
  • Serik G. Kanatbayev
  • Marat Bazarbayev
  • Sarsenbek T. Siyabekov
Regular Articles

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Brucella isolates from the Republic of Kazakhstan and to determine their biotype. The focus was laid on culture-morphological, biochemical, and biological properties of 59 Brucella isolates from primary cultures. Material was isolated from blood and tissue of serum-positive killed, dead diseased, or aborted domestic cattle from different regions of Kazakhstan where brucellosis is a common problem. Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) of all strains, isolated in different regions, has shown that Brucella isolates from the epizootic form two clusters. Based on the comparison with strains available in the MLVA database, B. abortus 0015/B is alike the B. abortus strains isolated from Italy and Portugal. B. melitensis 0016/B isolated from the Almaty region fits the third cluster and is alike the B. melitensis strains isolated from humans in Turkey, China, and Portugal. More than 90% of the overall B. abortus samples were isolated from the northern regions of the East and West Kazakhstan, while B. melitensis strains were registered in the southeast Kazakhstan. The most frequently recorded B. abortus biovar is biovar 3. The most frequently recorded B. melitensis biovars are biovars 1 and 3.

Significance and impact of study

These results contribute to a better understanding of the geographic pattern of Brucella infection in Kazakh cattle also important for developing the specific control measures. The results of current research can be used for creating a gene bank of Brucella strains circulating in Kazakhstan for producing diagnostic and therapeutic agents. The research material will be used to solve the problems of genetic characterization of Brucella species and to establish the phylogenetic relationships of strains.

Keywords

Brucellosis Infection monitoring Typing of Brucella isolates Phenotypic Genotypic R- and S-dissociation B. melitensis B. abortus Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was carried out within the framework of the Republican Scientific and Technical Program No. O.0600 Brucellosis in Cattle: Epizootic Monitoring, Diagnostic and Prevention Tools Design (2012-2014), supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. We would like to express our gratitude to the Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, namely Professor Zaitsev Valentin, the senior researcher Strochkov Vitaliy, and the Head of the Laboratory Sultankulova Kulyaisan, for assisting in electron microscopy, as well as with the AMOS-PCR and molecular typing of Brucella isolates, based on MLVA analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bamaiyi, P.H., Hassan, L., Khairani-Bejo, S., Zainal Abidin, M., Ramlan, M., Krishnan, N., Adzhar, A., Abdullah, N., Hamidah, N.H.M., Norsuhanna, M.M. and Hashim, S.N., 2012. Isolation and molecular characterization of Brucella melitensis from seropositive goats in Peninsula Malaysia, Trop Biomed., 29(4), 513–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baramova, Sh.A., et al., 2017. Recommendations on monitoring and assessing the spread of Brucella population in the Republic of Kazakhstan (Almaty), 18. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. De Santis, R., Ciammaruconi, A., Faggioni, G., Fillo, S., Gentile, B., Di Giannatale, E., Ancora, M. and Lista, F., 2011. High throughput MLVA-16 typing for Brucella based on the microfluidics technology, BMC Microbiology, 11, 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferreira, A.C., Chambel, L., Tenreiro, T., Cardoso, R., Flor, L., Travassos, I.D., Pacheco, T., Garin-Bastuji, B., Le Flèche, P., Vergnaud, G., Tenreiro, R. and Corrêa de Sá, M. I., 2012. MLVA16 typing of Portuguese human and animal Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus isolates, PLoS One., 7(8), e42514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Godfroid, J., Scholz, H.C., Barbier, T., Nicolas, C., Wattiau, P., Fretin, D., Whatmore, A.M., Cloeckaert, A., Blasco, J.M., Moriyon, I., Saegerman, C., Muma, J.B., Al Dahouk, S., Neubauer, H. and Letesson, J.J., 2011. Brucellosis at the animal/ecosystem/human interface at the beginning of the 21st century, Preventive veterinary medicine, 102(2), 118–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haque, N., Bari, M.S., Hossain, M.A., Muhammad, N., Ahmed, S., Rahman, A., Hoque, S.M. and Islam, A., 2011. An overview of Brucellosis, A Mymensingh Med J., 20(4), 742–747.Google Scholar
  7. Ibragimov, P.S., 2013. Monitoring of an epizootic situation on especially dangerous animal diseases in the Republic of Kazakhstan, analysis and expected disease forecast for 2007–2012 (Astana), 74.Google Scholar
  8. Ivanov, A.V., Pankova, E.V., Ahmadeev, R.М. and Plotnikova, E.M., 2012. DNA nucleotide sequences homology level from various Brucella strains, Achievements of science and technology of agriculture, 8, 82–84.Google Scholar
  9. Ivanov, N.P., Turgenbaev, K.A., Kozhaev, A.N., 2013. Infectious Diseases in Animals: A Monograph. Kazakh Agrarian University, Almaty, 1, 334-336. Google Scholar
  10. Jiang, H., Mao, L.-L., Zhao, H.-Y., Li, L.-Y., Piao, D.-R., Tian, G.-Z., Di, D.-D., Lei, L. and Cui, B.-Y., 2012. Reemergence and genetic comparison of Brucella canis in China, using a multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat assay, Vet Microbiol., 154(3–4), 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang, S.I., Heo, E.J., Cho, D., Kim, J.W., Kim, J.-Y., Jung, S. C. and Her, M., 2011. Genetic comparison of Brucella canis isolates by the MLVA assay in South Korea, J. Vet. Med. Sci., 73(6), 779–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kichan, L.E.E., Ji-Yeon, K.I.M., Sung-Il, K.A.N.G., Hyang Keun, L.E.E., Suk-Chan, J.U.N.G. and Moon, H.E.R., 2015. Multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis assay as a tool for the epidemiological study of Brucella canis in Korea, Turk J Vet Anim Sci., 39, 507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kulakov, Y. K., Heo, E.J., Cho, D., Kim, J.W., Kim, J.-Y., Jung, S.-Ch. and Her, M., 2011. Genetic characterization of Brucella melitensis isolates from Mongolia, Russia, and Azerbaijan, Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 73(6), 779–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindstedt, B.A., Torpdahl, M., Vergnaud, G., Le Hello, S., Weill, F.X., Tietze, E., Malorny, B., Prendergast, D.M., Ní Ghallchoir, E., Lista, R.F., Schouls, L.M., Söderlund, R., Börjesson, S. and Åkerström, S., 2013. Use of multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) in eight European countries, Euro Surveill., 18(4), 20385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maquart, M., Le Flèche, P., Foster, G., Tryland, M., Ramisse, F., Djønne, B., Al Dahouk, S., Jacques, I., Neubauer, H., Walravens, K., Godfroid, J., Cloeckaert, A. and Vergnaud, G., 2009. MLVA-16 typing of 295 marine mammal Brucella isolates from different animal and geographic origins identifies 7 major groups within Brucella ceti and Brucella pinnipedialis, Bio. Med. Centr. Microbiol., 9, 145.Google Scholar
  16. Mathew, C., Stokstad, M., Johansen, T. B., Klevar, S., Mdegela, R. H., Mwamengele, G., Michel, P., Escobar, L., Fretin, D. and Godfroid, J., 2015. First isolation, identification, phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Brucella abortus biovar 3 from dairy cattle in Tanzania, BMC Veterinary Research, 11, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Muendo, E. N., Mbatha, P. M., Macharia, J., Abdoel, T. H., Janszen, P. V., Pastoor, R., & Smits, H. L. (2012). Infection of cattle in Kenya with Brucella abortus biovar 3 and Brucella melitensis biovar 1 genotypes. Tropical animal health and production, 44(1), 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muma, J. B., Lund, A., Nielsen, K., Matope, G., Munyeme, M., Mwacalimba, K., & Skjerve, E. (2009). Effectiveness of Rose Bengal test and fluorescence polarization assay in the diagnosis of Brucella spp. infections in free range cattle reared in endemic areas in Zambia. Tropical animal health and production, 41(5), 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Orakbay, L.Zh., Cherepanova, L.Yu., Denisova, T.G., 2015. Epidemiological Model of Brucellosis: Modern Aspects. Modern problems of science and education, 6.Google Scholar
  20. Sadikalieva, S.O., Srochkov, V.M., Orynbaev, M.B., Shorayeva, K. A., Espembetov, B. A., Sansyzbay, A. R. and Sultankulova, K. T., 2017. Molecular-genetic typing of bacteria of genus Brucella circulated in the republic of Kazakhstan, Bulletin of the Bashkir University, 22(2), 403–408.Google Scholar
  21. Sansyzbay, A.R., et al., 2013a. Analysis of epizootic situation on animal brucellosis worldwide and in Kazakhstan, Veterinary, 10, 61–71.Google Scholar
  22. Sansyzbay, A.R., et al., 2013b. Study the morphological properties of Sand Rform Brucella using electron micros copy, Bulletin of Altai State University. Barnaul, 11, 32–39.Google Scholar
  23. Saxena, N., Singh, B.B. and Saxena, H.M., 2018. Brucellosis in Sheep and Goats and its Serodiagnosis and Epidemiology, Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 7(1), 1848–1877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scholz, H.C. and Vergnaud, G., 2013. Molecular characterisation of Brucella species, Rev Sci Tech., 32 (1), 149–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shevtsova, E., Shevtsov, A., Mukanov, K., Filipenko, M., Kamalova, D., Sytnik, I., Syzdykov, M., Kuznetsov, A., Akhmetova, A., Zharova, M., Karibaev, T., Tarlykov, P. and Ramanculov, E., 2016. Epidemiology of Brucellosis and Genetic Diversityof Brucella abortus in Kazakhstan, PLoS ONE, 11(12), e0167496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skliarov, O.D., 2002. Molecular typing of mycobecteria (Collection of Theses of the 4rd All-Russian Scientific Conference. Мoscow), 240.Google Scholar
  27. Syzdykov, М.S., Duisenova, A. K., et al., 2014a. Spatial location of Brucella melitensis biovars in the South of Kazakhstan (2014 American Society Biodefence Meeting), 70.Google Scholar
  28. Syzdykov, M.S., et al., 2014b. Laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis. Recommendations (Almaty), 64.Google Scholar
  29. Tiller, R.V., et al., 2009. Brucella: Molecular Microbiology and Genomics, J. Clin. Microbiol., 47(7), 2226–2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Torgerson, P.R., 2013. The emergence of echinococcosis in central Asia, Parasitology, 140(13), 1667–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Valdezate, S., et al., 2010. MLVA Genotyping of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus Isolates from Different Animal Species and Humans and Identification of Brucella suis Vaccine Strain S2 from Cattle in China, J. Clin. Microbiol., 48(8), 2734–2740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Whatmore, A.M., Koylass, M.S., Muchowski, J., Edwards-Smallbone, J., Gopaul, K.K. and Perrett, L.L., 2016. Extended Multilocus Sequence Analysis to Describe the Global Population Structure of the Genus Brucella: Phylogeography and Relationship to Biovars, Frontiersin Microbiology, 7, 2049.Google Scholar
  33. Yespembetov, B.A., Syrym, N.S. and Zinina, N.N., 2015. Analysis of epizootic situation on animal brucellosis in Kazakhstan in 2013, Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University, 4 (126).Google Scholar
  34. Yu, W.L. and Nielsen, K., 2010. Review of detection of Brucella spp. by polymerase chain reaction, Croatian medical journal, 51(4), 306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zahoor Khan, M. and Zahoor, M., 2018. An Overview of Brucellosis in Cattle and Humans, and its Serological and Molecular Diagnosis in Control Strategies, Trop. Med. Infect. Dis., 3, 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bolat A. Yespembetov
    • 1
  • Nazym S. Syrym
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nadezhda N. Zinina
    • 1
  • Makhpal K. Sarmykova
    • 1
  • Gulshat M. Konbayeva
    • 1
  • Sovetzhan Z. Basybekov
    • 2
  • Assiya K. Mussayeva
    • 2
  • Serik G. Kanatbayev
    • 2
  • Marat Bazarbayev
    • 2
  • Sarsenbek T. Siyabekov
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Institute for Biological Safety ProblemsGvardeyskKazakhstan
  2. 2.Kazakh Scientific Research Veterinary InstituteAlmatyKazakhstan
  3. 3.Kazakh National Agrarian UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations