Advertisement

Genetic and phenotypic aspects of early reproductive performance in Raeini Cashmere goats

  • M. S. MokhtariEmail author
  • M. Asadi Fozi
  • J. P. Gutierrez
  • D. R. Notter
Regular Articles
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This study used pedigree information and data collected from 1979 to 2012 at the Raeini Cashmere goat breeding station, located in Baft City in Kerman Province in southeastern Iran. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for early reproductive traits of breeding does, including total numbers of kids born at first kidding (LSB1), total numbers of kids weaned at first kidding (LSW1), total birth weight of all kids born at first kidding (LWB1), total weaning weight of all kids weaned at first kidding (LWW1), and age at first kidding (AFK), were estimated using a Bayesian approach via Gibbs sampling. Posterior means for heritability estimates of LSB1, LSW1, LWB1, LWW1, and AFK were statistically significant, with values of 0.12, 0.23, 0.17, 0.15, and 0.46, respectively. Low-to-moderate additive genetic variation was present for the studied reproductive traits. Estimated genetic correlations among LSB1, LSW1, LWB1, and LWW1 were statistically significant and ranged from 0.12 between LWB1 and LWW1 to 0.72 between LSB1 and LSW1. Corresponding phenotypic correlation estimates were also statistically significant and ranged from 0.04 between LWB1 and LWW1 to 0.55 between LSB1 and LSW1. Posterior means of genetic and phenotypic correlations between AFK and other studied traits were statistically significant only for LSB1 and LWB1. For LSB1, LSW1, LWB1, and LWW1, we conclude that genetic and phenotypic improvement in any of these traits in Raeini Cashmere does would favorably influence all of the other traits. However, does that first kidded at younger ages have smaller litters at birth and lower litter birth weights at their first parity.

Keywords

Litter size Litter weight First kidding Raeini Cashmere doe 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the staff in the Raeini Cashmere goat breeding station who were involved in data collection and maintaining the flock.

Compliance with ethical standards

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alexandre, G., Aumont, G., Mainaud, J.C., Fleury, J. and Naves, M., 1999. Productive performance of Guadalupean Creole goats during the suckling period. Small Ruminant Research, 34,155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagnicka, E., Wallin, E., Lukaszewicz, M. and Adnoy, T., 2007. Heritability for reproduction traits in Polish and Norwegian populations of dairy goat. Small Ruminant Research, 68, 256–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castaneda-Bustos, V.J., Montaldo, H.H., Torres-Hernandez, G., Perez-Elizalde, S., Valencia-Posadas, M., Hernandez-Mendo, O. and Shepard, L., 2014. Estimation of genetic parameters for productive life, reproduction, and milk-production traits in US dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(4), 2462–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cinkulov, M., Nebesni, A., Krajinovic, M., Pihler, I. and Zujovic, M., 2009. Reproductive traits of German Fawn goats in Vojvodina. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 25, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deribe, B. and Taye, M., 2014. Reproductive performance of Abergelle goats raised under traditional management systems in Sekota district, Ethiopia. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 4(1), 59–63.Google Scholar
  6. Gill, G.S. and Dev, D.S., 1972. Performance of two exotic breeds of goats under Indian conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Production, 3, 173.Google Scholar
  7. Gursoy, O., 2005. Small ruminant breeds in Turkey, (L. INIGUEZ editor), Characterization of small ruminant breeds in West Asia and North Africa, Volume 1: West Asia. ICARDA (The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas), Aleppo, Syria, pp. 239–416.Google Scholar
  8. Hamed, A., Mabrouk, M.M., Shaat, I. and Bata, S., 2009. Estimation of genetic parameters and some non-genetic factors for litter size at birth and weaning and milk yield traits in Zaraibi goats. Egyptian Journal of Sheep and Goat Sciences, 4(2), 55–64.Google Scholar
  9. Kebede, T., Hiale, A., Dadi, H. and Alemu, T., 2012. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for reproduction traits in indigenous Arsi-Bale goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44, 1007–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khazaal, K., 2005. Small ruminant breeds of Lebanon, (L. INIGUEZ editor), Characterization of small ruminant breeds in West Asia and North Africa, Volume 1: West Asia. ICARDA (The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas), Aleppo, Syria, pp.155–181.Google Scholar
  11. Kosgey, I.S. and Okeyo, A.M., 2007. Genetic improvement of small ruminants in low-input, smallholder production systems: technical and infrastructural issues. Small Ruminant Research, 70, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lanza, A., Sinatra, M.C., Pennisi, P., Licitra, G., Alizzio, A., Avodo, M. and Barresi, S., 1990. Characterisation of goats breeding in Sicily. Technica Agricola, 42 (2), 155–205.Google Scholar
  13. Lobo, R.N.B. and da Silva, F.L.R., 2005. Parâmetros genéticos para características de interesse econômica em cabras das racas Saanen e Anglo-Nubian, [Genetic parameters for economic traits in Saanen andAglo-Nubian goats], Revista Ciencia Agronomica, 36, 104–110.Google Scholar
  14. Maghsoudi, A., Vaez Torshizi, R. and Safi Jahanshahi, A., 2009. Estimates of (co)variance components for productive and composite reproductive traits in Iranian Cashmere goats. Livestock Science, 126, 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mellado, M., Mellado, J., Garcia, J.E. and Oplez, R., 2005. Lifetime reproductive performance of goats as a function of growth traits and reproductive performance early in life. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 27 (2), 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mellado, M., Valdez, R., Garcia, J.E., Lopez, R. and Rodriguez, A., 2006. Factors affecting the reproductive performance of goats under intensive conditions in a hot arid environment, Small Ruminant Research, 63, 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Menezes, L.M., Sousa, W.H., Cavalcanti-Filho, E.P. and Gama, L.T., 2016. Genetic parameters for reproduction and growth traits in Boer goatsin Brazil. Small Ruminant Research, 136, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mia, M.M., Khandoker, M.A.M.Y., Husain, S.S. Faruque, M.O. and Notter, D.R., 2013. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters of some reproductive traits of Black Bengal does. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 3(4), 829–837.Google Scholar
  19. Misztal, I., Tsuruta, S., Strabel, T., Auvray, B., Druet, T. and Lee, D., 2002. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In: Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, (Montpellier, France).Google Scholar
  20. Moaeen-ud-din, M., Yanf, L.G., Chen, S.L., Zhang, Z.R., Xiao, J.Z., Wen, Q.Y. and Dai, M., 2008. Reproductive performance of Matou goat under subtropical monsoonal climate of Central China. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 40, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Notter, D.R., 2000. Potential for hair sheep in the United States. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Notter, D.R., 2012. Genetic improvement of reproductive efficiency of sheep and goats. Animal Reproduction Science, 130, 147–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rashidi, A., Bishop, S.C. and Matika, O., 2011. Genetic parameter estimates for pre-weaning performance and reproduction traits in Markhoz goats. Small Ruminant Research, 100, 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Safari, E., Fogarty, N.M. and Gilmour, A.R., 2005. A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science, 92, 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shrestha, J.N.B. and Fahmy, M.H., 2007. Breeding goats for meat production: (3) selection and breeding strategies, Small Ruminant Research 67, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Snowder, G.D., 2008. Genetic improvement of overall reproductive success in sheep: A review. Asociacion Latinoamericana de Produccion Animal. 16, 32–40.Google Scholar
  27. Song, H.B., Jo, I.H. and Sol, H.S., 2006. Reproductive performance of Korean native goats under natural and intensive conditions. Small Ruminant Research, 65,284–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sorensen, D.A. and Gianola, D., 2002. Likelihood, Bayesian and MCMC methods in quantitative genetics. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 175 fifth Avenue, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Statistical Analysis System (SAS), 2004. SAS Users’ Guide, Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc.,Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Torres-Vazquez, J.A., Valencia-Posadas, M., Castillo-Juarez, H. and Montaldo, H.H., 2009. Genetic and phenotypic parameters of milk yield, milk composition and age at first kidding in Saanen goats from Mexico. Livestock Science, 126, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang, C-Y., Chen, S-L., Li, X., Xu, D-Q., Zhang, Y. and Yang, L-G., 2009. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for reproduction traits in the Boer dam. Livestock Science 125, 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Mokhtari
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Asadi Fozi
    • 2
  • J. P. Gutierrez
    • 3
  • D. R. Notter
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Animal Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of JiroftJiroftIran
  2. 2.Department of Animal Science, Faculty of AgricultureShahid Bahonar University of KermanKermanIran
  3. 3.Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de VeterinariaUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
  4. 4.Department of Animal and Poultry SciencesVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations