Advertisement

Effects of ammoniated pearl millet silage on intake, feeding behavior, and blood metabolites in feedlot lambs

  • Thomaz C. G. de C. Rodrigues
  • Poliane M. Freitas
  • Edson M. Santos
  • Gherman G. L. de Araújo
  • Aureliano J. V. Pires
  • Maria C. C. Ayres
  • Lorendane M. de Carvalho
  • Jocely G. Souza
  • Gleidson G. P. de CarvalhoEmail author
Regular Articles
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of urea as an additive in the ensiling of pearl millet on the intake, feeding behavior, and metabolic parameters of feedlot-finished lambs. Thirty-two uncastrated, mixed-breed male lambs were used in the experiment. Diets were composed of pearl millet silage enriched with 0, 2, 4, or 6% urea plus a concentrate containing ground corn, soybean meal, and a mineral mixture. The treatments did not affect feed intake (P > 0.05) but influenced (P < 0.05) eating time (in min/day, in min/kg of dry matter (DM), and in min/kg of neutral detergent fiber (NDF)) and chewing time in min/kg of DM. Eating efficiency (in g DM/h and in g NDFap/h) responded linearly (P < 0.05) to the increasing urea levels in the silages. By contrast, there was no effect (P > 0.05) of diets on the blood protein profile (total proteins and albumin), although the serum urea levels responded quadratically (P < 0.05). Increasing urea levels in the silage did not change the blood energy profile (cholesterol and triglycerides) or blood enzyme activity (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT); P > 0.05). In conclusion, the treatment of pearl millet silage with urea does not influence the DM intake or metabolic parameters of lambs, but leads to increased eating time and decreased eating efficiency.

Keywords

Additive Idleness Feed efficiency Urea levels Rumination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the machine learning engineer at Duolingo, Bill McDowell M.Sc., for the English corrections.

Funding information

This study was financed in part by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel-Brazil (CAPES) (Grant no. 001).

Compliance with ethical standards

Statement of animal right

The authors declare that all experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the current law of the country and were approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Experimentation (no.05-2016).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adogla-Bessa, T., Owen, E., Adesogan, A. T. 1999. Ensiling of whole crop wheat with cellulase–hemicellulase based enzymes: 3. Comparing effects of urea or enzyme treatment on forage composition and stability. Animal feed science and technology, 82, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amer, S., Hassanat, F., Berthiaume, R., Seguin, P., Mustafa, A.F. 2012. Effects of water soluble carbohydrate content on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition and in vitro gas production of forage millet and forage sorghum silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 177, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade-Montemayor, H.A., Gasca, T.G., Kawas, J. 2009. Ruminal fermentation modification of protein and carbohydrate by means of roasted and estimation of microbial protein synthesis. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 38, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  5. AOAC. 2002. Official Methods of Analysis. Gaithersburg, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
  6. Araujo, M.L.G.M.L., Carvalho, G.G.P., Ayres, M. C.C., Bezerra, L.S., Rebouças, R.A., Vieira Filho, C.H C., Oliveira, R.L., Silva, T.M., Leite, J.K.C., Teixeira, C.S.C. 2014. Assessment of the metabolic, protein, energy, and liver profiles of lambs finished in a feedlot and receiving diets containing groundnut cake. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 46, 433–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barros, R.C., Rocha Júnior, V.R., Saraiva, E.P., Mendes, G.A., Meneses, G.C.C., Oliveira, C.R., Rocha, W.J.B., Aguiar, A.C.R., Santos, C.C.R. 2011. Ingestive behavior of feedlot Nellore cattle with different levels of substitution of sorghum silage for sugarcane or sugarcane bagasse ammoniated with urea. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Veterinária, 18, 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beauchemin, K. A. 2018. Invited review: Current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows. Journal of dairy science, 101, 4762–4784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borburema, J.B., Cezar, M.F., Marques, D.D., Cunha, M.G.G., Pereira Filho, J.M., Sousa, W.H., Furtado, D.A., Costa, R.G. 2012. Effect of diet on the metabolic profile of Santa Inês sheep feedlot. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 64, 983–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgüer, P.J., Pereira, J.C., Queiroz, A.C., Silva, J.F.C., Valadares Filho, S.C., Cecon, P.R., Casali, A.D.P. 2000. Ingestive behavior in Holstein calves fed diets with different concentrate levels. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 29, 236–242.Google Scholar
  11. Carvalho, G.G.P., Pires, A.J.V., Silva, H.G.D.O., Veloso, C.M., Silva, R.R. 2007. Methodological aspects of chewing activity of dairy goats fed cocoa meal or palm cake. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 36, 103–110.Google Scholar
  12. Carvalho, G.G.P., Freitas, P.M.D., Santos, E.M., Araújo, G.G.L., Oliveira, J.S., Pires, A.J.V., Maranhão, C.M.A., Rodrigues, T.C.G.C., Freitas-Junior, J.E., Rufino, L.M.A., Rodrigues, C.S., Leite, L.C., Araujo, M.L.G.M.L. 2018. Effect of pearl millet silage ammoniated with urea on lamb production and metabolic performance. Grass and Forage Science, 73, 685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaves, A. V., Stanford, K., Dugan, M. E. R., Gibson, L. L., McAllister, T. A., Van Herk, F., & Benchaar, C. (2008). Effects of cinnamaldehyde, garlic and juniper berry essential oils on rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of growing lambs. Livestock Science, 117(2–3), 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa, R. G., Ribeiro, N. L., Nobre, P. T., Carvalho, F. F., Medeiros, A. N., Cruz, G. R., Freire, L. F. 2018. Biochemical and hormonal parameters of lambs using guava (Psidium guajava L.) agro-industrial waste in the diet. Tropical animal health and production, 50, 217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dado, R. G. and Allen, M. S. 1994. Variation in and relationships among feeding, chewing, and drinking variables for lating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77:132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eustáquio Filho, A., Carvalho, G.G.P., Pires, A.J.V., Silva, R.R., Santos P.E.F., Murta, R.M., Pereira, F.M., Carvalho, B.M.A., Maranhão, C.M.A., Rufino, L.M.A., Santos, S.A., Pina, D.S. 2016. Intake and ingestive behavior in lambs fed low-digestibility forages. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48, 1315–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. FAO, 2009. Grassland Index. A searchable catalogue of grass and forage legumes. FAO.Google Scholar
  18. Gobindram, M. N. E., Bognanno, M., Luciano, G., Lanza, M., & Biondi, L. 2016. Carob pulp inclusion in lamb diets: effect on intake, performance, feeding behaviour and blood metabolites. Animal Production Science, 56(5), 850–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunun, N., Wanapat, M., Gunun, P., Cherdthong, A., Khejornsart, P., Kang, S. 2016. Effect of treating sugarcane bagasse with urea and calcium hydroxide on feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation in beef cattle. Tropical animal health and production, 48, 1123–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, M.B. 2000. Neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrates. Nutritional relevance and analysis. University of Florida. Gainesville. 76 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Huntington, G. B., and S. L. Archibeque. 2000. Practical aspects of urea and ammonia metabolism in ruminants. Proc. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 1999. http://www.asas.org/symposia/proceedings/filename Accessed Oct. 04, 2019.
  22. Kaneko, J.J., Harvey, J.W., Bruss, M.L. 1997. In: Kaneko, J.J.; Harvey, J.W.; Bruss, M.L. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 5th ed. London: Academic Press, p.885–906.Google Scholar
  23. Kaneko, J.J., Harvey, J.W., Bruss, M.L. 2008. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 6th ed. San Diego: Academic Press. 904p.Google Scholar
  24. Licitra, G., Hernandez, T.M., Van Soest, P.J. 1996. Standartization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminants feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lopes, J., Evangelista, A.R. 2010. Fermentative and bromatological characteristics and population of yeast of sugarcane silage enriched with urea and with additive absorbent of humidity. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39, 984–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meira Jr, E.B.S., Rizzo, H., Benesi, F.J., Gregory, L. 2009. Influência dos fatores sexuais e etários sobre a proteína total, fração albumina e atividade sérica de aspartato-aminotransferase e gama-glutamiltransferase de ovinos da raça Santa Inês. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, 46, 448–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mertens, D.R. 1994. Regulation of forage intake. In: Fahey Jr., G.C. (Ed.). Forage quality, evaluation and utilization. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, p.450–493.Google Scholar
  28. Mertens, D.R. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 85, 1217–1240.Google Scholar
  29. Morais, J.B., Susin, I., Pires, A.V., Mendes, C.Q., Oliveira Junior, R.C.O., Packer, I.U. 2006. Ingestive behavior of sheep and nutrients digestibility of diet containing soybean hulls. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 41, 1157–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. NRC. 2007. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids and New World Camelids. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  31. Odhaib, K. J., Adeyemi, K. D., Ahmed, M. A., Jahromi, M. F., Jusoh, S., Samsudin, A. A., Halimatun, Y. Sazili, A. Q. 2018. Influence of Nigella sativa seeds, Rosmarinus officinalis leaves and their combination on growth performance, immune response and rumen metabolism in Dorper lambs. Tropical animal health and production, 50, 1011–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olafadehan, O.A., Adebayo, O.F. 2016. Nutritional evaluation of ammoniated ensiled threshed sorghum top as a feed for goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48, 785–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliveira Júnior, R.C., Pires, A.V., Fernandes, J.J.R., Susin, I., Santos, F.A.P., Araujo, R.C. 2004. Total replacement of soybean meal by urea or starea in high grain diets on nitrogen metabolism, ruminal ammonia-N concentration and blood parameters in beef cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 33, 738–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perazzo, A. F., Neto, S. P.H., Ribeiro, O.L., Santos, E. M., Carvalho, G. G.P., Oliveira, J.S., Rodrigues, T. C. G. C., Pinho, R. M. A. 2016. Correlations of intake, digestibility and performance with the ingestive behavior of lambs fed diets containing ammoniated buffel grass hay. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias, 37, 1551–1564.Google Scholar
  35. Perazzo, A.F., Neto, S.D.P.H., Ribeiro, O.L., Santos, E.M., Carvalho, G.G.P., Oliveira, J.S., Bezerra, H.F.C., Campos, F.S., Freitas Junior, J. E. (2017). Intake and ingestive behavior of lambs fed diets containing ammoniated buffel grass hay. Tropical animal health and production, 49, 717–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Polli, V.A., Restle, J., Senna, D.B., Almeida, S.R.S. 1996. Rumination of bovine and bubaline steers in feedlot regimen. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 25, 987–993.Google Scholar
  37. Przemysław, S., Cezary, P., Stanislawc, M., Krzystof, L., Barbara, P., Zofia, A., Maja, F., Katarzynaa, Z., Zabek, K. 2015. The effect of nutritional and fermentational characteristics of grass and legume silages on feed intake, growth performance and blood indices of lambs. Small Ruminant Research, 123, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pugh, D.C., Dum, M.S. 2005. Clínica de ovinos e caprinos. São Paulo: Edições Roca, 1150p.Google Scholar
  39. Ramos, J. P. F., Santos, E. M., Santos, A. P. M., de Souza, W. H., & Oliveira, J. S. 2016. Ensiling of Forage Crops in Semiarid Regions. In Advances in Silage Production and Utilization. InTech.Google Scholar
  40. Rezaei, J., Rouzbehan, Y., Fazaeli, H., Zahedifar, M. 2013. Carcass characteristics, non-carcass components and blood parameters of fattening lambs fed on diets containing amaranth silage substituted for corn silage. Small Ruminant Research, 114, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Santos, F.C.O., Mendonça, C.L., Silva Filho, A.P., Carvalho, C.C.D., Soares, P.C., Afonso, J.A.B. 2011. Biochemical and hormonal indicators of natural cases of pregnancy toxaemia of in sheep. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 31, 974–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Santos, R.D., Neves, A.L.A., Pereira, L.G.R., Sollengerger, L.E., Rodrigues, J.A.S., Tabosa, J.N., Vernerque, R.S., Oliveira, G.F., Jayme, D.G., Gonçalves, L.C. 2016. Agronomic traits, ensilability and nutritive value of five pearl millet cultivars grown in a Brazilian semi-arid region. Journal of Agricultural Science, 154,165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shakeri, P. 2016. Pistachio by-product as an alternative forage source for male lambs: Effects on performance, blood metabolites, and urine characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 211, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Silva, H.G.D.O., Pires, A.J.V., Cunha Neto, P.A.D., Carvalho, G.G.P.D.U., Veloso, C.M., Silva, F.F.D. 2007. Digestibility of nutrients in diets containing ammoniated elephantgrass and cocoa meal or palm kernel cake fed to sheep. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 36, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Soest, P.J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. London: Constock.Google Scholar
  46. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for extraction fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ward, J. D., Redfearn, D. D., McCormick, M. E., Cuomo, G. J. 2001. Chemical composition, ensiling characteristics, and apparent digestibility of summer annual forages in a subtropical doublecrop-ping system with annual ryegrass. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomaz C. G. de C. Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Poliane M. Freitas
    • 1
  • Edson M. Santos
    • 2
  • Gherman G. L. de Araújo
    • 3
  • Aureliano J. V. Pires
    • 4
  • Maria C. C. Ayres
    • 1
  • Lorendane M. de Carvalho
    • 5
  • Jocely G. Souza
    • 1
  • Gleidson G. P. de Carvalho
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Federal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil
  2. 2.Federal University of ParaíbaAriaBrazil
  3. 3.Embrapa Semi-AridPetrolinaBrazil
  4. 4.Southwest State University of BahiaItapetingaBrazil
  5. 5.Federal University of ViçosaViçosaBrazil

Personalised recommendations