Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 859–866 | Cite as

Effects of monensin feeding on performance, nutrient utilisation and enteric methane production in growing buffalo heifers

  • Shiva Gupta
  • Madhu MohiniEmail author
  • Bilal A. Malla
  • Goutam Mondal
  • Sujata Pandita
Regular Articles


Murrah buffalo heifers (live weight 135 ± 17 kg) were fed a total mixed ration without supplementation (CON), or supplemented with sodium monensin (MON; Rumensin® 200, Elanco Animal Health, Brazil) @ 0.6 mg/kg of body weight for 90 days. Nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention were estimated during the mid-experiment, and enteric methane production was measured by sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique for consecutive-5 days after the digestion trial. The dry matter (DM) and nutrient intake were not affected but DM intake expressed as percent of body weight was decreased by monensin supplementation (3 vs 2.7% for CON and MON, respectively). The crude protein digestibility was higher for MON whereas, digestibility of other nutrients was not affected. Nitrogen retention (+ 4.59 g/day) and daily body weight gain (+ 56 g/day) were greater for MON-fed heifers without any significant effect on nitrogen intake and nitrogen excretion through faeces and urine. Daily enteric methane production was reduced by 12.61% but the treatments did not differ significantly. Methane emission expressed as gram per unit of DM, organic matter and digestible DM intake was lower for MON than CON and methane conversion rate (Ym) % of GE and ME intake was also decreased by 8–9%. On day 60, blood glucose level was increased and urea nitrogen was decreased in MON-fed heifers. This study indicated that monensin supplementation at 0.6 mg/kg body weight in growing heifers improved daily gain and feed efficiency while it reduced enteric methane production which can reduce feedlot time and consequent life time CH4 production.


Heifers Growth Methane Monensin Nitrogen 



The authors would like to thank Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Climate Change, government of India (Grant No. 1900108) for financially supporting the study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. A.O.A.C., 2005. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Aderinboye, R.Y., Onwuka, C.F.I., Arigbede, O.M., Oduguwa, O.O., Aina, A.B.J., 2012. Effect of dietary monensin inclusion on performance, nutrient utilisation, rumen volatile fatty acid concentration and blood status of West African dwarf bucks fed with basal diets of forages. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44(5), 1079–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anassori, E., Dalir-Naghadeh, B., Valizadeh-Keshmeshtappeh, M., Jafari, S., 2017. A comparative study on the efficacy of Garlicon and monensin supplementation on blood metabolites and performance of fattening lambs. Livestock Science, 199, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appuhamy, J. R. N., Strathe, A. B., Jayasundara, S., Wagner-Riddle, C., Dijkstra, J., France, J., & Kebreab, E, 2013. Anti-methanogenic effects of monensin in dairy and beef cattle: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(8), 5161-5173.Google Scholar
  5. Benchaar, C., 2016. Diet supplementation with cinnamon oil, cinnamaldehyde, or monensin does not reduce enteric methane production of dairy cows. Animal, 10, 418–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benchaar, C., Duynisveld, J.L., Charmley, E., 2006. Effects of monensin and increasing dose levels of a mixture of essential oil compounds on intake, digestion and growth performance of beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 86(1), 91–96Google Scholar
  7. Chalupa, W., 1980. Chemical control of rumen microbial metabolism. In Digestive physiology and metabolism in ruminants (Springer, Dordrecht)Google Scholar
  8. Chapman, C.E., Chester-Jones, H., Ziegler, D., Clapper, J.A., Erickson, P.S., 2017. Effects of cinnamaldehyde or monensin on performance of weaned Holstein dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(3), 1712–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, N. A., Purdy, C. W. and Hutcheson, D. P. 1992. Influence of yeast culture on feeder calves and lambs. Journal of Animal Science, 70, 1682–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dangal, S.R., Tian, H., Zhang, B., Pan, S., Lu, C., Yang, J., 2017. Methane emission from global livestock sector during 1890–2014: magnitude, trends and spatiotemporal patterns. Global Change Biology, 23(10), 4147–-4161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deswysen, A.G., Ellis, W.C., Pond, K.R., Jenkins, W.L., Connelly, J., 1987. Effects of monensin on voluntary intake, eating and ruminating behavior and ruminal motility in heifers fed corn silage 1. Journal of Animal Science, 64(3), 827–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding, J., Zhou, Z.M., Ren, L.P., Meng, Q.X., 2008. Effect of monensin and live yeast supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass characteristics and ruminal fermentation parameters in lambs fed steam-flaked corn-based diets. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 21(4), 547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gholipour, A., Foroozandeh Shahraki, A.D., Tabeidian, S.A., Nasrollahi, S.M., Yang, W.Z., 2016. The effects of increasing garlic powder and monensin supplementation on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, growth performance and blood parameters of growing calves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 100(4), 623–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guan, H., Wittenberg, K.M., Ominski, K.H., Krause, D.O., 2006. Efficacy of ionophores in cattle diets for mitigation of enteric methane 1. Journal of Animal Science, 84(7), 1896–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Helal, F.I.S., Lasheen, M.A., 2008. The productive performance of Egyptian dairy buffaloes receiving biosynthetic bovine somatotropin (rbst) with or without monensin. American Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 3(5), 771–777Google Scholar
  16. Hemphill, C.N., Wickersham, T.A., Sawyer, J.E., Brown-Brandl, T.M., Freetly, H.C. and Hales, K.E., 2018. Effects of feeding monensin to bred heifers fed in a drylot on nutrient and energy balance. Journal of Animal Science, 96(3), 1171–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ICAR, 2013. Nutrient requirements of Cattle and Buffalo. 3rd ed. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Ipharraguerre, I.R., Clark, J.H., 2003. Usefulness of ionophores for lactating dairy cows: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 106, 39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeyanathan, J., Martin, C., Morgavi, D.P., 2014. The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review. Animal, 8(2), 250–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, K.A., Westberg, H.H., Michal, J.J. and Cossalman, M.W., 2007. The SF 6 tracer technique: methane measurement from ruminants. In Measuring methane production from ruminants (Springer, Dordrecht)Google Scholar
  21. Li, Z.J., Ren, H., Liu, S.M., Cai, C.J., Han, J.T., Li, F., Yao, J.H., 2018. Dynamics of methanogenesis, ruminal fermentation, and alfalfa degradation during adaptation to monensin supplementation in goats. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(2), 1048–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Licitra, G., Hernandez, T. M. and Van Soest, P. J. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57(4), 347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGinn, S.M., Beauchemin, K.A., Coates, T., Colombatto, D., 2004. Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast, and fumaric acid 1. Journal of Animal Science, 82(11), 3346–3356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGuffey, R.K., Richardson, L.F., Wilkinson, J.I.D., (2001) Ionophores for Dairy Cattle: Current Status and Future Outlook. Journal of Dairy Science 84:E194–E203Google Scholar
  25. Mimouni, M., Khardli, F.Z. Warad, I., Ahmad, M., Mubarak, M.S., Sultana, S., Hadda, T.B. 2014. Antimicrobial activity of naturally occurring antibiotics monensin, lasalocid and their metal complexes. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 5, 207–214Google Scholar
  26. Monnerat, J.P., Paulino, P.V., Detmann, E., Valadares Filho, S.C., Valadares, R.D., Duarte, M.S., 2013. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and monensin on digestion, ruminal parameters, and balance of nitrogenous compounds of beef cattle fed diets with different starch concentrations. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45(5), 1251–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nampoothiri, V.M., Mohini, M., Malla, B.A., Mondal, G. and Pandita, S., 2018. Growth performance, and enteric and manure greenhouse gas emissions from Murrah calves fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios. Animal Nutrition. 4(2), 215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. NRC, 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Seventh revised ed. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  29. Odongo, N.E., Bagg, R., Vessie, G., Dick, P., Or-Rashid, M.M., Hook, S.E., Gray, J.T., Kebreab, E., France, J., McBride, B.W., 2007. Long-term effects of feeding monensin on methane production in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 1781–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Plaizier, J.C., Martin, A., Duffield, T., Bagg, R., Dick, P., McBride, B.W., 2000. Effect of a prepartum administration of monensin in a controlled-release capsule on apparent digestibilities and nitrogen utilization in transition dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 2918–2925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roghani, E., Zamiri, M.J., Ebrahimi, S.R., 2006. Effects of monensin and thiamin and their combinations on feedlot performance, blood glucose, BUN levels and carcass characteristics of mehraban lambs fed a high concentrate diet. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(15), 2835–2840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruiz, R., Albrecht, G.L., Tedeschi, L.O., Jarvis, G., Russell, J.B., Fox, D.G., 2001. Effect of monensin on the performance and nitrogen utilization of lactating dairy cows consuming fresh forage. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 1717–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salles, M. S. V., Zanetti, M. A. and Salles, F. A., 2008. Effect of monensin on mineral balance in growing ruminants reared under different environmental temperatures, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 141, 233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shipe, W.F., Senyk, G.F., Fountain, K.B., 1980. Modified copper soap solvent extraction method for measuring free fatty acids in milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 63, 193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Soltan, Y. A., Hashem, N. M., Morsy, A. S., El-Azrak, K. M., El-Din, A. N., & Sallam, S. M, 2018. Comparative effects of Moringa oleifera root bark and monensin supplementations on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility and growth performance of growing lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 235, 189-201.Google Scholar
  36. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T.D., Castel, V., De Haan, C., 2006. Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food & Agriculture Org.Google Scholar
  37. Tedeschi, L.O., Fox, D.G., Tylutki, T.P., 2003. Potential environmental benefits of ionophores in ruminant diets. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 1591–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tomkins, N.W., Denman, S.E., Pilajun, R., Wanapat, M., McSweeney, C.S., Elliott, R., 2015. Manipulating rumen fermentation and methanogenesis using an essential oil and monensin in beef cattle fed a tropical grass hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 200, 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Soest, P.V., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vendramini, J.M.B., Sanchez, J.M.D., Cooke, R.F., Aguiar, A.D., Moriel, P., da Silva, W.L., Cunha, O.F.R., Ferreira, P.D.S., Pereira, A.C., 2015. Stocking rate and monensin supplemental level effects on growth performance of beef cattle consuming warm-season grasses. Journal of Animal Science, 93(7), 3682–3689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang, Z.B., Xin, H.S., Bao, J., Duan, C.Y., Chen, Y. and Qu, Y.L., 2015. Effects of hainanmycin or monensin supplementation on ruminal protein metabolism and populations of proteolytic bacteria in Holstein heifers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 201, 99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams, S.R.O., Moate, P.J., Hannah, M.C., Ribaux, B.E., Wales, W.J., Eckard, R.J., 2011. Background matters with the SF6 tracer method for estimating enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: A critical evaluation of the SF6 procedure. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 170, 265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Media B.V., onderdeel van Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shiva Gupta
    • 1
  • Madhu Mohini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bilal A. Malla
    • 1
  • Goutam Mondal
    • 1
  • Sujata Pandita
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR-National Dairy Research InstituteKarnalIndia

Personalised recommendations