Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 1–6 | Cite as

Effects of replacing maize offal with high levels of yam peels on the performance and nutrient digestibility of red Sokoto bucks

  • B. A. Kume
  • J. A. Ayoade
  • J. OlocheEmail author
Reviews

Abstract

Sixteen red Sokoto (RS) bucks having an average weight of 9.11 kg and aged 5–8 months were used to determine the performance and digestibility of diets containing graded levels of yam peel meal in a completely randomized design. Four diets were compounded to replace maize offal with yam peel meal (YPM) at 0% (T1), 50% (T2), 75% (T2), and 100% (T4) levels and fed to the red Sokoto bucks for 105 days. Results show that there was no effect of treatment on all the performance parameters measured. There was also no effect of treatment on dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, nitrogen free extract, and ether extract digestibility of RS bucks. The cell wall constituents showed treatment effects on acid detergent fiber, acid detergent lignin, and cellulose. The nutrient intake values for the proximate composition were similar across the treatments. However, ether extract (EE) values decreased significantly (P < 0.05) from T1 to T4 as the levels of YPM increased in the diets. Ash values on the other hand increased significantly (P < 0.05) from T1 to T4 with increasing levels of YPM. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) intake value for the control (T1) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the other treatments, but there was no significant difference between T2, T3, and T4. The study has shown that YPM can be used to replace maize offal up to 100% without adverse effect on the growth performance and digestibility of red Sokoto goats.

Keywords

Yam peel meal Feed intake Nutrient intake Fiber fraction digestibility 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Statement of animal rights

The research was performed in accordance with the ethical standard laid down in the 1996 declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aduku, A.O. 2014. Tropical Feedstuff Analysis Table. Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  2. Aina, A.B.J. 2002. Effects of dietary salt levels on the performance of West African Dwarf goats, Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 20, 47–54.Google Scholar
  3. Aka, C.O., Ugochukwu, N.C., Ahmed, A. and Pilan, N.N. 2011. The effect of ruminal incubation of bioactive yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on potential rumen degradadlility of Panicum maximum and Centrosem pubescens in West African dwarf sheep. Nigerian Journal of Veternary Science, 9(1), 28–35.Google Scholar
  4. Alikwe, P.C.N., Lamidi, A.A. and Aina, A.B.J. 2012. Comparative digestibility and nutrient balance of maize bran, Wheat offal and rice bran in West African dwarf goats, Journal of Agriculture and Social Research, 12 (1), 108–110. Google Scholar
  5. AOAC. 2000. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Official methods of analysis, 17th Version, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  6. Babayemi, O.J. and Bamikole, M.A. 2009. Silage quality, dry matter intake and digestibility by West African dwarf sheep of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum cv Ntchisi) harvested at 4 and 12 week regrowths. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8 (16), 3983–3988.Google Scholar
  7. Babayemi, O.J., Bamikole, M.A., Daniel, I.O., Ogunbesan, A. and Oduguwa, B.O. 2003. Growth, nutritive value and dry matter Degradability of three Tephrosia species, Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, (36), 62–70.Google Scholar
  8. Do ThiThanh, V. 2006. Some animals and factors affecting feed intake, behaviour and performance of Small ruminants. A Ph.D. Thesis Submitted to the Swedish University of Agriculture science, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  9. F.A.O 1995. Official method of analysis (16th edition), Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  10. Forbes, J.M. 1995. Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals, Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International, Walling Ford, UK, Pp. 539.Google Scholar
  11. Gatenby, R.M. 2002. Sheep revised Edition. Tropical Agriculture series, MacmillanPublishers Ltd, Pp. 8.Google Scholar
  12. Ibhaze, G.A., Babayemi, O.J. and Olorunisomo, O.A. 2014. Acceptability and digestibility of ensiled mixture of corncobs, Cassava peels and brewer’s grain by West African Dwarf goats, Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 41(2), 139–145.Google Scholar
  13. Ibrahim, A. A., Hudu, S., Tamburawa, M. S. and Ashiru, R. M. 2013. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility and haematological parameters of red Sokotogoats fed Sabara (Guiera senegalensis) Leaf meal, Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 4(1),53–58.Google Scholar
  14. Lamidi, A.A., Aina, A.B.J and Sowande, S.O. 2010. Nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance in West African dwarf goats fed blended diets for dry season, Proc. 35th Conf. Nig. Soc. for Anim. Prod. held on the 14th – 17th March, 2010 at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria, Pp. 499–501.Google Scholar
  15. McDonald, P., Edwards R.A., Greenhalgh, J.F.D. 1995. Animal nutrition. 5th Edition, Longman Group Ltd, Edinburg gate, Harlow Essex UK, Pp. 444–510.Google Scholar
  16. Microsoft Encarta. 2008. Microsoft Corporation.Google Scholar
  17. MINITAB 16. 2006. Statistical Software. V.10. 2 MINITAB Inc. P.A., USA.Google Scholar
  18. Okah, U., Anokwuru, R.K and Onyearu, V.O. 2014. Performance of West African (WAD) bucks fed differently processed poultry droppings, Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 41(2), 124–138.Google Scholar
  19. Oloche, J., Yimaor, T.S., Ayoade, J. A. and Oluremi, O.I.A. 2011. Performance of goats on free range supplemented with concentrate diets containing graded levels of Yam meal, Proc. 16th Ann. Conf., Anim. Sci. Ass. of Nig. held on 12th - 15th 2011, KSU Anyigba, Nigeria, Pp. 467–470.Google Scholar
  20. Oloche, J., Garba, O.S. and Oluremi, O.I.A. 2013. Response of West African Dwarf goats fed shea butter leaves (Vitellaria paradoxa) supplemented with varying levels of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel meal, Proc. 18th Ann. Conf. Anim. Sc. Association of Nig. (ASAN) held 8th - 12th September, 2013, Abuja, Pp. 367 - 370.Google Scholar
  21. Oluremi, O.I.A., Andrew, I.A, and Ngi, J. 2007. Evaluation of the nutritional potential of the peels of some citrus fruits varieties of feeding stuff in livestock production, Pakistani Journal of Nutrition, 6(6), 653–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanwo, K.A., Iposu, S.O., Oso, A.O., Fanimo, A.O. and Abiola, S.S. 2011. Growth Performance, nutrient intake and digestibility of goats fed melon husk and palm oil slurry at 30% inclusion level, Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 38(2), 148–154.Google Scholar
  23. Taiwo, A. A., Adejuyigbe, A. D., Adebowale, E. A., Shotan, J. S. and David, O. O. 2005. Performance and nutrient digestibility of weaned rabbit fed forages supplemented with concentrates, Nigerian Journal Animal Production, 32(1), 74–78.Google Scholar
  24. Trevaskis, L.M., Fulkerson, W.J. and Gooden, J.M. 2001. Provision of certain carbohydrate based supplements to pasture fed to sheep, Journal of ExperimentalAgriculture, 141, 21–27.Google Scholar
  25. Yashim, S.M., Haniel, B., Makama, S.R. and Adama, H.Y. 2016. Growth Performance, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance of red Sokoto bucks fed Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) peels as a replacement for maize offal, Journal of Animal Production and Research, 28(1), 245–253. Google Scholar
  26. Yusuf, K. O., Ajeigbe, O. M., Oyebo, A. T., Aderinboye, R. Y. and Onwuka C. F. I. 2017. Nutrients and anti-nutrients content of some crop by-products and residues for ruminant feeding in Nigeria, Journal of Animal Production and Research, 29(1), 321–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal ProductionUniversity of Agriculture MakurdiMakurdiNigeria

Personalised recommendations