Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 205–211 | Cite as

Performance and ingestive behavior of steers on integrated system using legume and/or energy supplementation

  • Eduardo Lisbinski
  • Ricardo Ronsani
  • João de Assis Farias
  • Wagner Paris
  • Roberta Farenzena
  • Fernanda Stanqueviski
  • Luís Fernando Glasenapp de MenezesEmail author
Regular Articles
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a mixture of temperate and legume grasses with or without energy supplementation on the performance and feeding behavior of finishing beef steers. Eighteen Nellore-Zebu steers, average 23 months old and body weight (BW) of 380 kg, were used in a continuous grazing system, in a randomized block experimental design. Treatments were ORS: oat (Avena strigosa Schreb) + annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam) + supplementation with corn bran; ORVS: oat + ryegrass + vetch (Vicia sativa L.) + supplementation with corn bran; and ORV: oat + ryegrass + vetch. Evaluations were conducted on pasture (forage mass, sward height, herbage accumulation, botanical composition, and chemical composition) and animal (performance and ingestive behavior). Stocking rate and forage mass were greater in treatments with energy supplementation (ORVS and ORS), thus presenting greater sward heights compared to the treatment without supplementation. There was greater participation of oats and ryegrass when vetch was absent (ORS). The presence of supplement (ORS and ORVS) increased the presence of oat stem. The presence of the supplement caused the contribution of the vetch to be lower, likely because of the higher animal load of these treatments. The higher presence of vetch increased crude protein content in the ORV treatment. The ORS exhibited greater gain per area compared to the ORV. Supplemented animals had lower grazing and greater idle time. The ORS treatment animals spent more time in other activities and consumed supplementation and less time grazing than the other treatments. The absence of supplement (ORV) caused the animals to spend more time grazing. Animals not supplemented showed a higher duration of daily chewing, number of chews per minute, number of daily chews, daily number of bites, and station numbers.

Keywords

Corn meal Oat Ryegrass Vetch 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agle, M., Hristov, A.N., Zaman, S., Schneider, C., Ndegwa, P. and Vaddella, V.K, 2010. The effects of ruminally degraded protein on rumen fermentation and ammonia losses from manure in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 1625--1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists– AOAC. 1993. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
  3. Casagrande, D. R., Azenha, M.V., Valente, A.L.S., Vieira, B.R., Moretti, M.H., Ruggieri, A.C., Berchielli, T.T. and Reis, R.A., 2011. Canopy characteristics and behaviour of Nellore heifers in Brachiaria brizantha pastures under different grazing heights at a continuous stocking rate. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40, 2294--2301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delagarde, R., Prache, S., D’Hour, P. and Petit, M., 2001. Grass intake by grazing ruminants. Fourrages, 212, 166--189.Google Scholar
  5. Detmann, E., Valente, E.E.L., Batista, E.D. and Huhtanen, P., 2014. An evaluation of the performance and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle fed tropical grass pastures with supplementation. Livestock Science, 162, 141--153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewhurst, R.J., Delaby L., Moloney A., Boland T. Lewis E. 2009. Nutritive value of forage legumesused for grazing and silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 48, 167–187.Google Scholar
  7. Dierking, R.M., Kallenbach, R.L. and Grün, I.U., 2010. Effect of forage species on fatty acid content and performance of pasture-finished steers. Meat Science, 85, 597--605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Difante G.D.S., Euclides, V.P.B., Nascimento Júnior, D.D., da Silva, S.C., Torres Júnior, R.A.D.A., Sarmento D.O.D.L. 2009. Ingestive behaviour herbage intake and grazing efficiency of beef cattle steers on Tanzania guineagrass subjected to rotational stocking managements. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38, 1001--1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards, G. R., Parsons, A. J., Bryant, R. H., 2008. Manipulating dietary preference to improve animal performance. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48, 773–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eskandari, H., Ghanbari, A. and Javanmard, A., 2009. Intercropping of Cereals and Legumes for Forage Production. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 1, 7--13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Euclides, V.P.B., da Conceição Lopes, F., Nascimento Junior, D., da Silva, S.C., Difante, G.S., and Barbosa, R.A., 2016. Steer performance on Panicum maximum (cv. Mombaça) pastures under two grazing intensities. Animal Production Science, 56, 1849--1856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garduño-Castro, Y., Espinoza-Ortega, A., Gonzalez-Esquivel, C.E., Mateo-Salazar, B. and Arriaga-Jórdan, C.M., 2008. Intercropped oats (Avena sativa)—common vetch (Vicia sativa) silage in the dry season for small-scale dairy systems in the Highlands of Central Mexico. Tropical Animal Health And Production, 41, 827–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goering, K.H. and Van Soest, P.J., 1970. Forage fibre analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some application). Washington, D.C.: US Department of Agriculture, p. 379. (Agricultural Handbook).Google Scholar
  14. Greenquist, M.A., Klopfenstein, T.J., Schacht, W.H., Erickson, G.E., Vander Pol, K.J., Luebbe, M.K., Brink, K.R., Schwarz, A.K. and Baleseng, L.B. 2009. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and dried distillers grains supplementation: forage use and performance of yearling steers. Journal of Animal Science, 87, 3639--3646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heringer, I. and Carvalho, P.C.F. 2002. Ajuste da carga animal em experimentos de pastejo: uma nova proposta. Ciência Rural, 32, 675--679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirai, M.M.G., Menezes, L.F.G., Kuss, F., Paris, W., Lisbinski, E., Oliveira, O.N., Nazário, D., Schimtz, G. R., 2015. Finishing steers on oat pasture intercropped with legumes or receiving energetic supplementation. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 67, 1141–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodgson, J. 1982. Ingestive behaviour. In: J. D. LEAVER (Ed.) Herbage intake handbook. British Grassland Society, Hurley. p. 113.Google Scholar
  18. Klein, S.I., Larson, Q.P., Bauer, M.L., Caton, J.S., Dahlen, C.R. 2015. Effects of alternate day feeding of dried distiller’s grains plus solubles in forage-fed steers on intake, ruminal fermentation and passage rates, and serum nonesterified fatty acid. Journal of animal science, 93, 3959–3968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunkle, W.E. and Bates, D.B. 1998. Evaluating feed purchasing options: energy, protein, and mineral supplements. In: Florida beef cattle short course, 1998, Gainesville. University of Florida, p. 59-70.Google Scholar
  20. Laca, E.A., Ungar, E.D., Seligman, N. and Demment, M.W. 1992. Effects of sward height and bulk density on bite dimensios of cattle grazing homogeneous swards. Grass and Forage Science, 47, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lüscher, A., Mueller-Harvey, I., Soussana, J.F., Rees, R.M., Peyraud, J. L. 2014. Potential of legume-based grassland–livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass and Forage Science, 69, 206–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mendes, F.B.L., Silva, R.R., Carvalho, G.G.P., Silva, F.F., Lins, T.O.J.D., Da Silva, A.L.N., Macedo, V., Abreu Filho, G., De Souza, S.O. and Guimarães, J.O. 2014. Ingestive behaviour of grazing steers fed increasing levels of concentrate supplementation with different crude protein contents. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 47, 423--428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mott, G. O. and Lucas, H. L. 1952. The design conduct and interpretation of grazing trials on cultivated and improved pastures. In.: International Grassland Congress, n.6. Proceedings… Pensylvania: State College Press, p. 1380–1395.Google Scholar
  24. Paris, W., Marchesan, R., Cecato, U., Martin, T.N., Ziech, M.F. and Borges, G.D.S., 2012 Dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping. Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences, 34, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Penning, P.D., Rutter, S.M. 2004. Ingestive behaviour. In: P.D. Penning (Ed.), Herbage intake handbook. The British Grassland Society, Reading, 151–175.Google Scholar
  26. Salgado, P., Thang, V.Q., Thu, T.V., Trach, N.X., Cuong, V.C., Lecomte, P. and Richard, D., 2012. Oats (Avena strigosa) as winter forage for dairy cows in Vietnam: an on-farm study. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45, 561--568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SAS INSTITUTE. SAS/STAT user’s guide: statistics. 4. ed. Version 6, Cary: v.2, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. Simic, A., Vuckovic, S. 2014. Pasture and meadow legumes in Serbia. Legumes Perspectives, 5, 14–15.Google Scholar
  29. Solos, E. 1999. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Rio de Janeiro, 412.Google Scholar
  30. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583--3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilm, H.G., Costello, D.F. and Klipple, G.E. 1944. Estimating forage yield by the double-sampling methods. Journal of American Society of Agronomy, 36, 194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wright, A., 2013. Effect of forage type and corn supplementation on animal performance and meat quality. All Theses. Paper 1636.Google Scholar
  33. Zebeli, Q., Aschenbach, J.R., Tafaj, M., Boguhn, J., Ametaj, B.N., and Drochner, W. 2012. Invited review: Role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 1041–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Lisbinski
    • 1
  • Ricardo Ronsani
    • 1
  • João de Assis Farias
    • 1
  • Wagner Paris
    • 1
  • Roberta Farenzena
    • 1
  • Fernanda Stanqueviski
    • 1
  • Luís Fernando Glasenapp de Menezes
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Graduate Program in Animal ScienceFederal University of Technology – ParanáDois VizinhosBrazil

Personalised recommendations