Appraisal of growth curve in Sirohi goat using non-linear growth curve models

  • Hina Ashraf WaizEmail author
  • Lokesh Gautam
  • Syma Ashraf Waiz
Regular Articles


In the present study, the appropriateness of five non-linear mixed growth curve models was studied to describe body weight growth of Sirohi male and female goat from birth to 12 months of age. Using selected functions, biologically pertinent variables were estimated for each goat from the Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richard, and Weibull. In addition, the males had higher asymptotic live weight ‘A’ than female counterparts. The highest values for ‘B’ parameter were observed for Weibull in both sexes, whereas the lowest value was calculated from Gompertz model. Maturity rate ‘K’ was higher in males than that of females. Male goat had heavier inflection weight ‘m’ and higher age than females for all the models. The best model was determined by considering the following goodness of fit criteria: coefficient of determination (R2), mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean square absolute percentage error (MAPE). In both the sexes, all the non-linear regression models fitted the data well with high coefficient of determination (R2) ranging from 0.99 to 0.89 and 0.99 to 0.91 for male and female respectively. The Brody model provided the best fit of growth curve in both males and females and the lowest fit of growth were provided by Weibull model. We therefore, concluded that the Brody model was favorable for determining body weight in both sexes of Sirohi goat.


Growth curve Sirohi Body weight Non-linear mixed models 



We thank the livestock research farm staff, who cordially cooperated by providing valuable information to accomplish this research work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Animal Husbandry Rajasthan, 2016.
  2. Bates, D.M. and Watts, D.G., 1988. Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications, New York;Wiley, Second Edition.Google Scholar
  3. Bathaei, S.S., Leroy, P.L., 1998. Genetic and phenotypic aspects of the growth curve characteristics in Mehraban Iranian fat-tailed sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 29, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhusan, S., 2012. Effect of non-genetic factors on body weights of Jakhrana kids. Indian Journal Small Ruminants,18, 253–255Google Scholar
  5. Brody, S., 1945. Bio energetics and Growth. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Cak, B., Yilmaz, O., Keskin, S., Beyril, T. and Tariq, M.M., 2017. Determination of appropriate growth models for early selection possibilities in Goats. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 49, 543–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fekedulegn, D.M., Siurtain, M. and Colbert, J., 1999. Parameter estimation of nonlinear growth models in forestry. Silva Fennica, 4, 327–336.Google Scholar
  8. Freitas, A.R., 2005. Curvas de crescimento na produç ão animal. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 34,786–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ganesan, R., Danavanthan, P., Balasubramanyam, D., Kumarasamy, P. and Kiruthika., 2015. Growth modeling and factors affecting growth traits in Madras Red sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 49, 20–25Google Scholar
  10. Gbangboche, A.B., Glele-Kakai, R., Salifou, S., Albuquerque, L.G. and Leroy, P., 2008. Comparison of non-linear growth models to describe the growth curve in West African Dwarf sheep. Animal, 2, 1003–1012Google Scholar
  11. Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N., 2015. Modeling the growth curve of Iranian Shall sheep using non-linear growth models. Small Ruminant Research, 130, 60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hojjati, F. and Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N.,2018. Comparison of non-linear growth models to describe the growth curve of Mehraban sheep. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46, 499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kopuzlu, S., Sezgin, E., Esenbuga, N. and Bilgin, O.C., 2014. Estimation of growth curve characteristics of Hemsin male and female sheep. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 42, 228–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kvalseth T. O. 1985. Cautionary note about R2. American Statisticians, 39, 279–285Google Scholar
  15. Laird, A.K. 1965. Dynamics of relative growth. Growth, 29, 249–263Google Scholar
  16. Nelder, J.A.,1961. The fitting of generalization of logistic curve. Biometrics, 17, 89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ozdemir, H. and Dellal, G., 2009. Determination of growth curves in young angora goats. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. Ankara University. Ziraat Fakul, 15,358–362Google Scholar
  18. Raji, A.O., sheikh, L.G. and Mohammed I.D., 2015. Comparison of growth of male and female kids of non- descript goats in a semi-arid region of Nigeria. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 5, 115–120Google Scholar
  19. Richards, F.J., 1959. A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of experimental botany, 10, 290–300.Google Scholar
  20. Sengul, T. and Kiraz, S., 2005. Non-linear models for growth curves in large white turkeys. Turkish journal of veterinary and animal science, 29, 331–337.Google Scholar
  21. Tariq, M., Iqbal, F., Eyduran, E., Bajwa, M.A., Huma, Z.E. and Waheed, A., 2013.Comparison of non-linear functions to describe the growth in Mengali sheep breed of Balochistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 45, 3, 661–665Google Scholar
  22. Teleken, J. T., Galvao, A.C. and Robazza W. D., 2017. Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals. Acta Scientiarum, 39,73–81.Google Scholar
  23. Topal, M., Ozdemir, M., Aksakal, V., Yildiz, N. and Dogru, U., 2004. Determination of the best nonlinear function in order to estimate growth in Morkaraman and Awassi lambs. Small Ruminant Research, 55, 229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Topal, M. and Boulkbasi, S.C., 2008. Comparison of Nonlinear Growth Curve Models in Broiler Chickens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 34, 149–152Google Scholar
  25. Waheed, A., Khan, M.S., Ali, S. and Sarwar, M., 2011. Estimation of growth curve in Beetal goats. Archiv Tierzucht, 3, 287–296.Google Scholar
  26. Weibull, W., 1952. A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 293–296Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hina Ashraf Waiz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lokesh Gautam
    • 2
  • Syma Ashraf Waiz
    • 3
  1. 1.Livestock Production Management, College of veterinary & Animal Science, UdaipurRajasthan University of Veterinary & Animal ScienceBikanerIndia
  2. 2.Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary &Animal Science, UdaipurRajasthan University of Veterinary & Animal ScienceBikanerIndia
  3. 3.Department of Education, Natural ScienceSrinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations