Advertisement

Dietary effects of commercial probiotics on growth performance, digestibility, and intestinal morphometry of broiler chickens

  • Precious Jewel D. dela Cruz
  • Clarita T. Dagaas
  • Karen Mae M. Mangubat
  • Amado A. Angeles
  • Oliver D. Abanto
Regular Articles
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

This study compared five commercially available probiotics vis-à-vis antibiotic growth promotant (AGP) supplementation and absence of feed additive based on efficiency, intestinal morphometry, and energy digestibility in improving broiler chicken production. A total of 630 straight run (Cobb) day-old broiler chicks were distributed to seven treatments following a completely randomized design, with ten replicates per treatment and nine birds per replicate per cage. Dietary treatments consisted of basal diet in combination with the following: without probiotics and AGP supplementation (treatment 1); 75 ppm each of chlorotetracycline (CTC) and Zn bacitracin (treatment 2); probiotic A, Bacillus subtilis (treatment 3); probiotic B, Bacillus subtilis (treatment 4); probiotic C, Enterococcus faecium (treatment 5); and probiotic D, Bacillus subtilis (treatment 6); probiotic E, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium spp., Pediococcus spp., and Lactobacillus spp. (treatment 7). At day 42, energy digestibility was determined by fasting three randomly selected birds from each treatment for 12 h and then subjecting them to their corresponding dietary treatments. Excreta were collected and pooled after 24 h of feeding. Pooled excreta were weighed, oven-dried, and subjected to energy analyses after 3-day collection. Apparent total tract metabolizable energy was then computed. At day 47, three birds were randomly selected per treatment for intestinal morphometry (villi height and crypt depth) of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. Dietary supplementation using probiotics showed no significant effect on overall body weight, weight gain, feed consumption, feed efficiency, dressing percentage, mortality, harvest recovery, carcass quality parameters (e.g., meat to bone ratio and abdominal fat content), intestinal morphometry, and energy digestibility. Birds under treatment 7 (basal feed + probiotic E) generated the highest income over feed and chick cost.

Keywords

Production performance Carcass quality Probiotics Antibiotic growth promotant Apparent Metabolizable Energy Intestinal morphometry 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Acar, J.F. and Mouglin G. 2006. Antimicrobial resistance at farm level. Revve Scientifque et Technique, 25(2), 775–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aceret, A.G. 1988. Commercial growth promotants on the performance of broilers (MS Thesis, University of the Philippines Los Baños).Google Scholar
  3. Awad W.A., Ghareeb K, Abdel-Raheem S, Böhm J. 2009. Effects of Dietary Inclusion of Probiotic and Synbiotic on Growth Performance, Organ Weights, and Intestinal Histomorphology of Broiler Chickens. Poultry Science; 88(1):49–56.  https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai Sp, Wu Am, Ding Xm, Lei Y, Bai J, Zhang Ky, Chio Js. 2013. Effects of probiotic-supplemented diets on growth performance and intestinal immune characteristics of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 92(3), 663–70.  https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balotoc, A.T. 1992. Zinc bacitracin, zeolite and live yeast culture in broiler diets. (Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis, University of the Philippines Los Baños).Google Scholar
  6. Cavazzoni, V., Adami, A., and Castrovalt, C. 1998. Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulants as probiotics. British Poultry Science, 39, 526–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dizaji, B. R., Zakeri, A., Golbazfarsad, A., Faramarzy, S., and Ranjbari, O. 2013 Influences of Different Growth Promoters on Intestinal Morphology of Broiler Chickens. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 3(2):32–37Google Scholar
  8. Flores, H.R. 2003. Effects of different batches of liquid probiotics on the performance of broilers (Unpublished BS Thesis, University of the Philippines Los Baños).Google Scholar
  9. Fuller, R. 2001. The chicken gut microflora and probiotic supplements. Journal of Poultry Science, 38, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jin, L.Z., Ho, Y.W., Abdula, N. Jalaludins S. 2000. Digestive and bacterial enzyme activities in broiler fed diets supplemented with Lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Sciences, 79, 886–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jung, S.J., Houde, R., Baurhoo, B., Zhao, X., Le, B.H. 2008. Effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and a Bifidobacteria lactis-based probiotic strain on the growth performance and fecal microflora of broiler chickens. Poultry Sciences, 87, 1694–1699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lope, C. 2003. The performance of broilers fed with probiotics in drinking water, in feed or both. (Unpublished BS Thesis, University of the Philippines Los Baños).Google Scholar
  13. Mills, S., Stanton, C., Fitzgerald, G.F. and Ross, R.P. 2011. Enhancing the stress responses of probiotics for a lifestyle from gut to product and back again. Microbial Cell Factories, 10(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mohan, B., Kadirvel, R., Natarahan, A., Bhaskaran, M. 1996. Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth, nitrogen utilization and serum cholesterol in broilers. British Poultry Science, 37, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohnl, M. 2006. Benefits from using biomin c-x and biomin imbo in poultry production. Biomin Newsletter, 4–37.Google Scholar
  16. Mountzouris, K.C., P. Tsirtsikos, E. Kalamara, S. Nitsch, G. Schatmayr, and K. Fegeros. 2007. Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Probiotic Containing Lactobacillus, Bifido bacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in Promoting Broiler Performance and Modulating Cecal Microflora Composition and Metabolic Activities. Poultry Science 86:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nunes R.V., C. Scherer, P. C. Pozza, Cinthia Eyng, L.D.G. Bruno, And F.M. Vietes. 2012. Use of Probiotics to Replace Antibiotics for Broilers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41 (10), 2219–2224.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-359820120010000012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olnood, G., Beski S.M.S, Choct, M., And Iji, P.A. 2015. Novel Probiotics: Their Effects on Growth Performance, Gut Development, Microbial Community and Activity of Broiler Chickens. Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.,Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Otutumi, L.K., Gois, B.M., Garcia E.R. and Loddi, M.M. 2012. Variations on the efficacy of probiotics in poultry. Probiotic in Animals, Everlon Cid Rigobelo, IntechOpen.  https://doi.org/10.5772/50058.
  20. Panda, A.K., Reddy, M.R., Ramarao, S.V. and Praharaj, N.K. 2000. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotic on performance and immune response of layers in decline phase of production. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 3, 102–104.Google Scholar
  21. Pelicia, K., Mendes, A.A., Saldanha E.S.P.B., Pizzolante, C.C., Takashi, S.E., Moreira, J., Garcia, R.G., Quinteiro, R.R., Paz, I.C.L.A., and Komiyama, C.M. 2004. Use of prebiotics and probiotics of bacterial and yeast origin for free-range broiler chickens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2004000300006.
  22. Piao X.S., Han, I.K., Kim, J.H., Cho, W.J., Kim, Y.H., Chao, L. 1999. Effects of enzyme, phytase, and yeast supplementation on the growth performance and pollution reduction of chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology Journal, 65(11), 4981–6.Google Scholar
  23. Ramlah, A.H. and Tan, C.K. 1995. Effects of probiotic supplementation on broiler performance. Perlanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 18(2), 109–112.Google Scholar
  24. Roughani, E., Arab, M. and Akbarian, A. 2007. Effects of probiotic and other feed additives on performance and immune response of broiler chicks. Department of Animal Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.Google Scholar
  25. Salianeh, N., Shirzad, M.R., Seifi, S.J. 2011. Performance and antibody response of broiler chickens fed diets containing probiotic and prebiotic. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 39(1), 65–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Samli, H.E., Senkoylu, N., Koc, M., Kanter, M,. and Agma, A. 2007. Arch. Effect of a dietary supplementation combining a probiotic and a natural anticoccidial in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 61(1), 42–49.Google Scholar
  27. Santoso, U., Tanaka, K. and Othani S. 1995. Effects of dried Bacillus cultures on growth of lipogenic enzymes in female chicks. British Journal, 7, 123–129.Google Scholar
  28. Singh, S. K, Niranjan, P. S, Singh, U. B, Koley S, Verma, D.N. 2009. Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotics on broiler chicken. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 9, 23–24.Google Scholar
  29. Snel, J. H., J. M. Harmsen, P. W. Van De Wielen, And B. A. Williams. 2002. Dietary strategies to influence the gastrointestinal microflora of young animals, and its potential to improve intestinal health. Pages 37–69 in Nutrition and Health of the Gastrointestinal Tract. M. C. Block, ed. Wageningen Academic Publishing, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  30. Talebi, A., Amirzadeh, B., Mokhtar, B., and Gahri, H. 2008. Production of organic acids by probiotic Lactobacilli can be used to reduce pathogen load in poultry. PLOS ONE, 37(5), 509–512.Google Scholar
  31. Tanaka, K. and Santoso, S. 2000. Fermented product from Bacillus subtillis inhibits lipid accumulation and ammonia production of broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 13, 78–80.Google Scholar
  32. Weis, J., Hrnčár, C., Pál, G., Baraňska, B., Bujko, J., and Malíková, L. 2011. Effect of probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium M74 supplementation on the carcass parameters of different hybrid combination chickens. Scientific Papers: Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 44(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266440078_Effect_of_Probiotic_Strain_Enterococcus_faecium_M74_Supplementation_on_the_Carcass_Parameters_of_Different_Hybrid_Combination_Chickens 
  33. Zhang, Z.F. and I.H. Kim. 2014. Effects of Multistrain Probiotics on Growth Performance, Apparent Ileal Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Characteristcs, Cecal Microbial Shedding, and Excreta Odor Contents in Broilers. Poultry Science 93 :364–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zulkifli, I.A., Mohd, N.N., Ho, Y.W. 2000. Growth performance and immune response of two commercial Lactobacillus cultures and oxytetracycline under heat stress condition. British Poultry Science, 41, 593–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the Philippines Rural High School, College of Arts and SciencesUniversity of the Philippines Los BañosLos BañosPhilippines
  2. 2.Institute of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Food ScienceUniversity of the Philippines Los BañosLos BañosPhilippines
  3. 3.Los BañosPhilippines

Personalised recommendations