Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 197–203 | Cite as

Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Brucella seropositivity in dairy and mixed cattle herds from Ecuador

  • A. CarboneroEmail author
  • L.T. Guzmán
  • I. García-Bocanegra
  • C. Borge
  • L. Adaszek
  • A. Arenas
  • L. R. Saa
Regular Articles

Abstract

An extensive cross-sectional study to determine the seroprevalence of and associated risk factors for Brucella infection was performed in dairy and mixed (dairy-beef) cattle herds in Ecuador. A total of 2666 serum samples from 386 farms were analyzed using Rose Bengal test and a blocking ELISA test. In addition, a questionnaire with 57 variables related to management, feeding, facilities, biosecurity, and animal health was filled in every cattle farm. A Generalized Estimating Equations model was used to determine the factors associated with Brucella seropositivity. The true prevalence of Brucella seropositivity in dairy and mixed cattle from Ecuador reached 17.0% (CI95% 15.6–18.4%). The herd prevalence was 45.1% (174/386) (CI95% 40.1–50.1%), and the within-herd prevalence ranged from 10 to 100% (mean 38.9%; Q1 14.3%, Q2 26.8%, Q3 52.5%). Seven factors were included in the GEE model for Brucella seropositivity: the nominal variables sex (OR 2.03; CI95% 1.32–3.13), herd type (dairy) (OR 1.79; CI95% 1.11–2.87), closed facilities in the farm (OR 1.80; CI95% 1.19–2.74), and ad libitum feeding (OR: 0.32; CI95%: 0.19–0.54), and the quantitative variables age (OR 1.005; CI95% 1.001–1.009), average slope in the farm (%) (OR 1.013; CI95% 1.002–1.024), and annual abortion rate (OR 1.016; CI95% 1.002–1.031). This study remarks the high spread of Brucella infection in cattle farms from Ecuador. In addition, it reports the risk factors associated to this infection in the predominant extensive system existent in this country.

Keywords

Brucella Cattle Dairy Seropositivity Risk factors Ecuador 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the farmers who participated in the present study as well as the staff of the Animal Health and Zoonotic Diseases Laboratory, belonging to Biotechnology and Production section.

Funding information

This study was financed by the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (Ecuador).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical statement and animal rights

Permission and licenses from the Ecuadorian Ministry of Agriculture and Ethics Committee of the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja to sample herds was obtained before the start of the study. In addition, consent to extract the samples was obtained from the owners at each farm. The study was performed among domestic animals from rural areas only. According to the Convention on Biological Diversity and CITES, no damage to endangered species of wild fauna and flora occurred during the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11250_2017_1421_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Table S1 (DOCX 19 kb)
11250_2017_1421_MOESM2_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Table S2 (DOCX 14 kb)
11250_2017_1421_MOESM3_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Table S3 (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. Alves, A.J., Rocha, F., Amaku, M., Ferreira, F., Telles, E.O., Grisi Filho, J.H., Ferreira Neto, J.S., Zylbersztajn, D., Dias, R.A., 2015. Economic analysis of vaccination to control bovine brucellosis in the States of Sao Paulo and Mato Grosso, Brazil. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 118, 351--358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriopoulos, P., Kalogerakou, A., Rebelou, D., Gil, A.P., Zyga, S., Gennimata, V., Tsironi, M., 2015. Prevalence of Brucella antibodies on a previously acute brucellosis infected population: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of Rose Bengal and Wright standard tube agglutination tests. Infection, 43, 325--330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anka, M.S., Hassan, L., Khairani-Bejo, S., Zainal, M.A., Mohamad, R.B., Salleh, A., Adzhar, A., 2014. A case-control study of risk factors for bovine brucellosis seropositivity in Peninsular Malaysia. PLoS One, 9, e108673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aznar, M.N., Linares, F.J., Cosentino, B., Sago, A., La Sala, L., León, E., Duffy, S., Perez, A., 2015. Prevalence and spatial distribution of bovine brucellosis in San Luis and La Pampa, Argentina. BMC Veterinary Research, 11, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aznar, M.N., Samartino, L.E., Humblet, M.F., Saegerman, C., 2014. Bovine brucellosis in Argentina and bordering countries: update. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 61, 121--133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beldomenico, P.M., Begon, M., 2010. Disease spread, susceptibility and infection intensity: vicious circles? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 21--27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boukary, A.R., Saegerman, C., Abatih, E., Fretin, D., Alambédji Bada, R., De Deken, R., Harouna, H.A., Yenikoye, A., Thys, E., 2013. Seroprevalence and potential risk factors for Brucella spp. infection in traditional cattle, sheep and goats reared in urban, periurban and rural areas of Niger. PLoS One, 8, e83175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carbonero, A., Saa, L.R., Jara, D.V., Garcia-Bocanegra, I., Arenas, A., Borge, C., Perea, A., 2011. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated to Bovine Herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) infection in non-vaccinated dairy and dual purpose cattle herds in Ecuador. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 100, 84--88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiebao, D.P., Valadas, S.Y., Minervino, A.H., Castro, V., Romaldini, A.H., Calhau, A.S., De Souza, R.A., Gennari, S.M., Keid, L.B., Soares, R.M., 2015. Variables Associated with Infections of Cattle by Brucella abortus., Leptospira spp. and Neospora spp. in Amazon Region in Brazil. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 62, e30--36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, R.M., 2002. Control and eradication of animal diseases in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 50, 6--12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dohoo, I., Martin, W., Stryhn, H., 2009. Screening and diagnostic tests. In: Veterinary Epidemiologic Research, 2nd edition, (VER. Inc., Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada), 91--134.Google Scholar
  12. Godfroid, J., Käsbohrer, A., 2002. Brucellosis in the European Union and Norway at the turn of the twenty-first century. Veterinary Microbiology, 90, 135--145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths, I.B., Gallego, M.I., De Leon, L.S., 1984. Levels of some reproductive diseases in the dairy cattle of Colombia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 16, 219--223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindahl, E., Sattorov, N., Boqvist, S., Sattori, I., Magnusson, U., 2014. Seropositivity and risk factors for Brucella in dairy cows in urban and peri-urban small-scale farming in Tajikistan. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 46, 563--569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lucero, N.E., Ayala, S.M., Escobar, G.I., Jacob, N.R., 2008. Brucella isolated in humans and animals in Latin America from 1968 to 2006. Epidemiology & Infection, 136, 496--503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin, L.B., Weil, Z.M., Nelson, R.J., 2008. Seasonal changes in vertebrate immune activity: mediation by physiological trade-offs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363, 321--339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mugizi, D.R., Boqvist, S., Nasinyama, G.W., Waiswa, C., Ikwap, K., Rock, K., Lindahl, E., Magnusson, U., Erume, J., 2015. Prevalence of and factors associated with Brucella sero-positivity in cattle in urban and peri-urban Gulu and Soroti towns of Uganda. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 77, 557--564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nasinyama, G., Ssekawojwa, E., Opuda, J., Grimaud, P., Etter, E., Bellinguez, A., 2014. Brucella sero-prevalence and modifiable risk factors among predisposed cattle keepers and consumers of un-pasteurized milk in Mbarara and Kampala districts, Uganda. African Health Sciences, 14, 790--796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Poulsen, K.P., Hutchins, F.T., McNulty, C.M., Tremblay, M., Zabala, C., Barragan, V., Lopez, L., Trueba, G., Bethel, J.W., 2014. Brucellosis in dairy cattle and goats in northern Ecuador. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 90, 712--715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodríguez-Hidalgo, R.I., Contreras-Zamora, J., Benitez Ortiz, W., Guerrero-Viracocha, K., Salcan-Guaman, H., Minda, E., Ron Garrido, L., 2015. Circulating Strains of Brucella abortus in Cattle in Santo Domingo De Los Tsáchilas Province - Ecuador. Frontiers in Public Health, 3, 45.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ron-Román, J., Ron-Garrido, L., Abatih, E., Celi-Erazo, M., Vizcaíno-Ordóñez, L., Calva-Pacheco, J., González-Andrade, P., Berkvens, D., Benítez-Ortíz, W., Brandt, J., Fretin, D., Saegerman, C., 2014. Human brucellosis in northwest Ecuador: typifying Brucella spp., seroprevalence, and associated risk factors. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 14, 124--133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ron-Román, J., Saegerman, C., Minda-Aluisa, E., Benítez-Ortíz, W., Brandt, J., Douce, R., 2012. First report of orchitis in man caused by Brucella abortus biovar 1 in Ecuador. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 87, 524--528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roop, R.M., Gaines, J.M., Anderson, E.S., Caswell, C.C., Martin, D.W., 2009. Survival of the fittest: how Brucella strains adapt to their intracellular niche in the host. Medical Microbiology and Immunology, 198, 221--238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Treanor, J.J., Geremia, C., Ballou, M.A., Keisler, D.H., White, P.J., Cox, J.J., Crowley, P.H., 2015. Maintenance of brucellosis in Yellowstone bison: linking seasonal food resources, host-pathogen interaction, and life-history trade-offs. Ecology and Evolution, 5, 3783--3799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Health, Veterinary FacultyUniversity of CordobaCórdobaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Sanidad Animal y ZoonosisUniversidad Técnica Particular de LojaLojaEcuador
  3. 3.Department of Epizootiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of Life Sciences in LublinLublinPoland

Personalised recommendations