Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 205–208 | Cite as

Bio-economic evaluation of a reduced phosphorus supplementation strategy for a cow-calf system in Brazil: a case study

  • Samara P. Lopes
  • Felipe Z. Garcia
  • Vinícius C. Souza
  • Diogo Fleury A. Costa
  • Pedro MalafaiaEmail author
Short Communications


Fertility, weight of calves at weaning, and the economic aspects of a breeding herd receiving mineral supplements containing 75 or 12.5 g of phosphorus (P)/kg were measured from 2013 to 2016. No differences in reproduction parameters or weight at weaning were found before and after the adoption of the new scheme of mineral supplementation. Before the study, the annual cost with the formula containing more P was equivalent to 29.3 weaned beef calves; after the P reduction, the annual cost was equivalent to 2.2 to 6.8 weaned calves. After 3 years of supplementation with 12.5 g P/kg no signs of P deficiency were observed. The clinical-nutritional diagnosis of the herd indicated no cause-effect of P content of mineral supplements upon fertility or performance of healthy cows, demonstranting that the adequate forage allowance was enough to meet most P required by the cows.


Cost of production Phosphorus Mineral supplementation 


Compliance with ethical standard

Ethical approval

All procedureswere approved by the ethics committee on the use of human and animal subjects in teaching and research of the UFRRJ.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.


  1. CEPEA, 2014. Média ponderada do boi gordo no estado de São Paulo. Available at Accessed on 30 march 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Costa, R.M., Ponsano, E.H.G., Souza, V.C. and Malafaia, P., 2016. Reduction of phosphorus concentration in mineral supplement on fertility rate, maternal ability and costs of beef cows reared in pastures of Urochloa decumbens. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48,417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jackson, D., Rolfe, J., English, B., Holmes, B., Matthews, R., Dixon, R., Smith, P. and Macdonald, N., 2012. Phosphorus management of beef cattle in northern Australia. Ed. Ian Partridge. Published by: Meat & Livestock Australia Limited.Google Scholar
  4. Malafaia, P., Magnoli Costa, R., Brito, M.F., Peixoto, P.V., Barbosa, J.D., Tokarnia, C.H. and Döbereiner, J. 2014. Erroneous interpretations regarding mineral deficiencies and supplementation of cattle in Brazil. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 34,244–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Peixoto, P.V., Malafaia, P., Miranda, L.V., Canella, C.F.C., Canella Filho, C.F.C. and Vilas Boas, F.V. 2003. Reproduction performance of beef cattle cows given three different types of mineral supplements. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 23, 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Van Niekerk, B.D.H. and Jacobs, G.A. 1985. Protein, energy and phosphorus supplementation of cattle fed low-quality forage. South African Journal of Animal Science 15, 133–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samara P. Lopes
    • 1
  • Felipe Z. Garcia
    • 1
  • Vinícius C. Souza
    • 2
  • Diogo Fleury A. Costa
    • 3
  • Pedro Malafaia
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.PPGZ, UFRRJSeropédicaBrazil
  2. 2.DZO, UnespJaboticabalBrazil
  3. 3.Beef Cattle Research CenterKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  4. 4.DNAP, UFRRJSeropédicaBrazil

Personalised recommendations