Development of GPF Using Micro-CT Measurement and Numerical Analytical Technique

  • Hiroki Nakayama
  • Yasuyuki Banno
  • Hiroshi Mochizuki
  • Hiroyuki Hara
  • Akito Takayama
  • Makoto NagataEmail author
  • Yoshikazu Sasaki
  • Shigeru Yoneyama
Original Paper


Gasoline particulate filters (GPFs) have recently been employed in gasoline fueled vehicles to trap particulate matter from exhaust fumes. The severe emission regulations which will be imposed in the near future will require GPFs to control the particulate number (PN) and exhaust gas (CO, HC, NOx) emissions and have low back pressure. To satisfy all these requirements, a unique catalytic design has been developed in which two different catalyst layers are applied within the GPF wall. The first catalytic layer is relatively coarse and contributes to the low back pressure and high gas conversion performance; the second is relatively dense and contributes to high PN filtration efficiency. The pore size, pore volume, and penetrating pore number were analyzed by numerical analysis followed by micro computed tomography (micro-CT). From the precise micro-CT measurement and numerical analysis of the penetrating pores, correlations were observed between the small penetration pore structure and PN filtration efficiency, and between the large penetration pore structure and back pressure.


GPF Micro-CT Penetration pore High filtration efficiency 



The authors wish to thank Dr. Stanley A. Roth of BASF Corporation for his contribution to and support of this study. We would like to thank Editage ( for English language editing.


  1. 1.
    Ito Y, Shimoda T, Aoki T, Yuuki K, Sakamoto H, Kato K, Thier D, Kattouah P, Ohara E, Vogt C (2015) Next generation of ceramic wall flow gasoline particulate filter with integrated three way catalyst. SAE technical paper, 2015-01-1073Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Inoda S, Nomura Y, Ori H, Yabuzaki Y (2017) Development of new coating technology optimized for each function of coated GPF. SAE technical paper, 2017-01-0929Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ito Y, Shimoda T, Aoki T, Shibagaki Y et al (2013) Advanced ceramic wall flow filter for reduction of particulate number emission of direct injection gasoline engines. SAE technical paper, 2013-01-0836Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guan B, Zhan R, Lin H, Huang Z (2015) Review of the state-of-the-art of exhaust particulate filter technology in internal combustion engines. J Environ Manage 154:225–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Václavik M, Plachá M, Koči P, Svoboda M, Hotchkiss T, Novák V, Thompsett D (2017) Structure characterization of catalytic particulate filters for automotive exhaust gas aftertreatment. Mater Charact 134:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gong J, Stewart ML, Zelenyuk A, Strzelec A, Viswanathan S, Rothamer DA, Foster DE, Rutland CJ (2018) Importance of filters’ microstructure in dynamic filtration modeling of gasoline particulate filters (GPFs): inhomogeneous porosity and pore size distribution. Chem Eng J 338:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanaka A, Miyoshi N, Sato A (2018) Development of low pressure and high performance GPF catalyst. SAE technical paper, 2018-01-1261Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sathiamoorthy B, Graper A, McIntosh A, Kaminski W (2017) The benefits and challenges faced by aftermarket catalyst manufacturers in implementing advanced coating techniques in TWC (gasoline applications). SAE technical paper, 2017-01-0921Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Their D, Kato K, Kattouah P, Ohara E, Vogt CD et al (2015) Novel GPF concepts with integrated catalyst for low backpressure and low CO2 emissions. Internationaler Motorenkongress: Mit Nutzfahrzeugmotoren—Spezial, pp 217–232Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Winkler A, Ferri D, Hauert R (2010) Influence of aging effects on the conversion efficiency of automotive exhaust gas catalysts. Catal Today 155:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fouard C, Cassot E, Malandain G, Mazel C, Prohaska S, Asselot D, Westerhoff M, Marc-Vergnes JP (2004) Skeletonization by blocks for large 3D datasets: application to brain microcirculation. In: Biomedical imaging: nano to macro, 2nd IEEE international symposium, pp 89–92Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.N.E. Chemcat CorporationTokyoJapan
  2. 2.JEOL Ltd.TokyoJapan
  3. 3.MAXNET Co., Ltd.TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations