Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 61, Issue 15–17, pp 1746–1756 | Cite as

Catalyst for Selective Hydrogenolysis of Glycerol, Prepared from Hydrotalcite-Like Structures

  • Jiří KolenaEmail author
  • Lenka Skuhrovcová
  • Jaroslav Kocík
  • Jan Šafář
  • Jaroslav Kupčík
Original Paper


A process of transforming hydrotalcite, containing Cu–Zn–Al (2:1:1) to a catalysts for selective hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1,2-propanediol has been studied. A two steps process, consisted of the calcination at increased temperature and subsequent reduction with hydrogen, as well as a one step process, in which the hydrotalcite was heated at hydrogen atmosphere so the calcination and reduction were joined to one operation, were verified experimentally. The influence of the temperature in the calcination step in the two steps process on composition, texture and catalytic properties of the active form of catalyst has been studied in detail. X Ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analyses, nitrogen physisorption, mercury porosimetry, temperature-programmed reduction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy were used for the catalysts characterization. A study of calcination of a Cu–Zn–Al containing hydrotalcite at different temperatures showed, that at temperature ending with 350 °C, predominantly amorphous, mixed oxides containing phase was formed. The most active and most selective catalyst was obtained by the reduction of this amorphous oxide phase. In contrary, highly crystalline material was obtained at higher calcination temperatures, i.e at 450 or 700 °C respectively, but the activity of the reduced form of these crystalline oxides was lower. It was also proven, that by simultaneous calcination and reduction, a catalyst of the same activity and even better selectivity towards 1,2-propanediol could be prepared, comparing with the catalyst prepared by the two steps method.


Hydrotalcite Catalyst Activation Hydrogenolysis Glycerol 1,2-Propanediol Cu 



This publication is a result of the project Development of the UniCRE Centre (LO1606) which has been financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the National Sustainability Programme I. The results were achieved using the infrastructure of the project Efficient Use of Energy Resources Using Catalytic Processes (LM2015039) which has been financially supported by MEYS within the targeted support of large infrastructures.

Supplementary material

11244_2018_1005_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (7.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 8052 KB)
11244_2018_1005_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (576 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 576 KB)


  1. 1.
    Zhou C, Zhao H, Tong D, Wu L, Yu W (2013) Catal Rev: Sci Eng 55:369–453. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruppert AM, Weinberg K, Palkovits R (2012) Angewandte Chem Int Ed 51:2564–2601. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jean D,. Nohair B, Bergeron J, Kaliaguine S (2014) Ind Eng Chem Res 53:18740–18749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Du Y, Wang C, Jiang H, Chen C, Chen R (2016) J Ind Eng Chem 35:262–267. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balaraju M, Jagadeeswaraiah K, Sai Prasad BS, Lingaiah N (2012) Catal Sci Technol 2:1967–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xiao Z, Li C, Xiu J, Wang X, Williams CT, Liang C (2012) J Mol Catal A 365:24–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiu CW, Dasari MA, Suppes GJ, Sutterlin WR (2006) AICHE J 52:3543–3548. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bienholz A, Schwab F, Claus P (2010) Green Chem 12:290–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu Y, Pasupulety N, Gunda K, Rempel G, Flora TT (2014) Top Catal 57:1454–1462. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pudi S et al (2014) Int J Chem React Eng 12:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Valencia R, Tirado JA, Sotelo R, Trejo F, Lartundo L (2015) React Kinet Mech Catal 116:205–222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meher LC, Gopinath R, Naik SN, Dalai AK (2009) Ind Eng Chem Res 48:1840–1846. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kolena J. Soukupová L, Kocík J, Lederer J (2017) React Kinet Mech Catal. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar P, Srivastava CV, Moshra IM (2015) Energy Fuels 29:2664–2675. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang LH, Zheng C, Li F, Evans DG, Duan X (2008) J Mater Sci 43:237–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cavani F, Trifiro F, Vaccari A (1991) Catal Today 11:173–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fornasari G, Gazzano M, Matteuzzi D, Trifiro F, Vaccari A (1995) Appl Clay Sci 10:1069–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Casenave S, Martinez H, Guimon C, Auroux A, Hulea V, Dumitriu E (2003) J Therm Anal Calorim 72:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xia S, Yuan Z, Wang L, Chen P, Hou Z (2011) Appl Catal A 403:173–182. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xia S, Zheng L, Nie R, Chen P, Lou H, Hou Z (2013) Chin J Catal 34:986–992. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuan ZL, Wang JH, Wang LN, Xie WH, Chen P, Hou ZY, Zheng XM (2011) Appl Catal B 101:431–440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yan N, Dyson PJ 2013, Curr Opin Chem Eng. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lábár JL (2008) Microsc Microanal 14:287–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lábár JL (2009) Microsc Microanal 15:120–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lábár JL (2012) Microsc Microanal 18:406–420. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    JCPDS PDF-2 database (2004) International Centre for Diffraction Data. Newtown Square, PA, Release 54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiří Kolena
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lenka Skuhrovcová
    • 1
  • Jaroslav Kocík
    • 1
  • Jan Šafář
    • 1
  • Jaroslav Kupčík
    • 2
  1. 1.Unipetrol Centre for Research and EducationLitvínovCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the Czech Academy of SciencesRezCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations