Advertisement

Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 61, Issue 15–17, pp 1641–1652 | Cite as

Comparative Study of Lewis Acid Transformation on Non-reducible and Reducible Oxides Under Hydrogen Atmosphere by In Situ DRIFTS of Adsorbed NH3

  • Adisak Guntida
  • Kongkiat Suriye
  • Joongjai Panpranot
  • Piyasan Praserthdam
Original Paper
  • 140 Downloads

Abstract

The Lewis acid transformation to Bronsted acid was investigated over the Pt/γ-Al2O3 hybrid catalysts in the presence of hydrogen atmosphere by in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) of adsorbed NH3. The changes of FTIR spectra were monitored during the introduction of hydrogen at 40 °C and atmospheric pressure for 130 min. The degrees of Lewis acid transformation were varied by addition of non-reducible (SiO2 and Al2O3) and reducible (ZrO2, TiO2 and CeO2) oxides to the Pt/γ-Al2O3 catalysts as the hybrid catalysts. According to the in situ DRIFTS, the hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR), and the hydrogen temperature programmed desorption (H2-TPD) results, the introduction of hydrogen resulted in a decrease in the amount of ammonia adsorbed on Lewis acid sites, and an increase in the amount of ammonium ions on Bronsted acid sites with time on stream. It is proposed that ammonia migration from Lewis acid sites to Bronsted acid sites occurred during the introduction of hydrogen in the presence of Pt particles when compared to the observation of only observed catalysts (without Pt particles). The addition of reducible oxides led to the high rate of Lewis acid transformation, which was higher than those of the non-reducible oxides. Weaker Lewis acid sites and higher amount of hydrogen spillover over the observed catalysts enhanced the rate of Lewis acid transformation in this study. However, the amount of Lewis acid sites at the initial stage did not play an important role in these transformations.

Keywords

Lewis acid transformation Hydrogen spillover Non-reducible oxides Reducible oxides Ammonia migration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the SCG Chemical Co., Ltd. for the financial support of this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Corma A (1995) Inorganic solid acids and their use in acid-catalyzed hydrocarbon reactions. Chem Rev 95:559–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang P, Zhang W, Zhang Q, Xu Z, Yang C, Li C (2018) Comparative study of n-butane isomerization over SO4 2–/Al2O3-ZrO2 and HZSM-5 zeolites at low reaction temperatures. Appl Catal A 550:98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Song C, Chu Y, Wang M, Shi H, Zhao L, Guo X, Yang W, Shen J, Xue N, Peng L, Ding W (2017) Cooperativity of adjacent Brønsted acid sites in MFI zeolite channel leads to enhanced polarization and cracking of alkanes. J Catal 349:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Han W, Nie H, Long X, Li M, Yang Q, Li D (2017) Effects of the support Brønsted acidity on the hydrodesulfurization and hydrodenitrogention activity of sulfided NiMo/Al2O3 catalysts. Catal Today 292:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi S-W, Kim W-G, So J-S, Moore JS, Liu Y, Dixit RS, Pendergast JG, Sievers C, Sholl DS, Nair S, Jones CW (2017) Propane dehydrogenation catalyzed by gallosilicate MFI zeolites with perturbed acidity. J Catal 345:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee W, Lee T, Jang H-G, Cho SJ, Choi J, Ha K-S (2017) Effects of hierarchical zeolites on aromatization of acetylene. Catal Today 303:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ebitani K, Tsuji J, Hattori H, Kita H (1992) Dynamic modification of surface acid properties with hydrogen molecule for zirconium oxide promoted by platinum and sulfate ions. J Catal 135:609–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hattori H, Shishido T (1997) Molecular hydrogen-originated protonic acid site as active site on solid acid catalyst. Catal Surv Asia 1:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ohgoshi S, Nakamura I (1993) Hydrogenation of isobutylene by spiltover hydrogen from Pt/KA-zeolite to NaY-zeolite. Stud Surf Sci Catal 77:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khoobiar S (1964) Particle to particle migration of hydrogen atoms on platinum—alumina catalysts from particle to neighboring particles. J Phys Chem 68:411–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ceckiewicz S, Delmon B (1987) Cooperative action of Pt/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst and gamma-Al2O3 diluent in the hydrogenation of benzene. J Catal 108:294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ueda R, Tomishige K, Fujimoto K (1999) Promoting effect of hydrogen spillover on pyridine migration adsorbed on Lewis acid sites in USY zeolite. Catal Lett 57:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen C-H, Huang C-C (2008) Enhancement of hydrogen spillover onto carbon nanotubes with defect feature. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 109:549–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shin H, Choi M, Kim H (2016) A mechanistic model for hydrogen activation, spillover, and its chemical reaction in a zeolite-encapsulated Pt catalyst. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:7035–7041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prins R, Palfi VK, Reiher M (2012) Hydrogen spillover to nonreducible supports. J Phys Chem C 116:14274–14283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prins R (2012) Hydrogen spillover. Facts and fiction. Chem Rev 112:2714–2738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Im J, Shin H, Jang H, Kim H, Choi M (2014) Maximizing the catalytic function of hydrogen spillover in platinum-encapsulated aluminosilicates with controlled nanostructures. Nat Commun 5:3370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barzetti T, Selli E, Moscotti D, Forni L (1996) Pyridine and ammonia as probes for FTIR analysis of solid acid catalysts. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 92:1401–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hegarty MES, O’Connor AM, Ross JRH (1998) Syngas production from natural gas using ZrO2-supported metals. Catal Today 42:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nakagawa K, Ikenaga N, Teng Y, Kobayashi T, Suzuki T (1999) Transient response of catalyst bed temperature in the pulsed reaction of partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas over supported rhodium and iridium catalysts. J Catal 186:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vorakitkanvasin S, Phongsawat W, Suriye K, Praserthdam P, Panpranot J (2017) In situ-DRIFTS study: influence of surface acidity of rhenium-based catalysts in the metathesis of various olefins for propylene production. RSC Adv 7:38659–38665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mapes JE, Eischens RP (1954) The infrared spectra of ammonia chemisorbed on cracking catalysts. J Phys Chem 58:1059–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duan Y, Wang J, Yu T, Shen M, Wang J (2015) The role and activity of various adsorbed ammonia species on Cu/SAPO-34 catalyst during passive-SCR process. RSC Adv 5:14103–14113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jin T, Yamaguchi T, Tanabe K (1986) Mechanism of acidity generation on sulfur-promoted metal oxides. J Phys Chem 90:4794–4796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paál Z, Menon PG (1983) Hydrogen effects in metal catalysts. Catal Rev 25:229–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu C, Li X, Wang T (2015) Catalytic hydrogenation of isophthalonitrile (IPN) over supported monometallic and bimetallic catalysts. RSC Adv 5:57277–57285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adisak Guntida
    • 1
  • Kongkiat Suriye
    • 2
  • Joongjai Panpranot
    • 1
  • Piyasan Praserthdam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Center of Excellence on Catalysis and Catalytic Reaction EngineeringChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.SCG Chemicals, Co., Ltd.BangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations