Advertisement

Topics in Catalysis

, Volume 61, Issue 12–13, pp 1350–1361 | Cite as

Ag or Au Nanoparticles Decorated Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Coated Carbon Paste Electrodes for Amperometric Determination of H2O2

  • Valéria Guzsvány
  • Olga Vajdle
  • Milana Gurdeljević
  • Zoltán Kónya
Original Paper

Abstract

Composite materials made of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and silver (Ag-MWCNT) or gold particles (Au-MWCNT) were synthesized and characterized by XRD and SEM/EDS techniques. The composites and the MWCNTs were applied as surface modifiers of carbon paste electrodes (CPEs). The mediator based electrocatalytic activity of the modified electrodes was investigated for H2O2 oxidation/reduction by electrochemical measurements. All voltammetric working electrodes (Ag-MWCNT/CPE, Au-MWCNT/CPE, MWCNT/CPE and the bare CPE) were characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in acetate and phosphate supporting electrolytes (0.1 mol L−1, pH 4.50 and 7.50, respectively) in the absence and presence of the H2O2 analyte. Amperometric experiments were performed in stirred solutions at selected constant working potentials, in accordance with the CV responses, for developing new analytical methods for the determination of H2O2. In the case of the Ag-MWCNT/CPE the most promising working potentials in the acetate buffer solution were − 0.40 V and + 0.80 versus SCE; in phosphate buffer solution these values were between − 0.20 and − 0.30 V and from + 0.60 to + 1.0 V. The Au-MWCNT/CPE is applicable in acetate buffer supporting electrolyte in the working potential close to − 0.30 V versus SCE and from + 0.70 to + 1.0 V; in the phosphate buffer solution only from + 0.60 V versus SCE and higher values. Due to the presence of the signal enhancement effect of Au and Ag nanoparticles, the sensitivity of the obtained methods is significantly higher in comparison to the results obtained by the MWCNT/CPE and bare CPE. The relative standard deviation of the measurements was lower than 10%. The practical application using the Ag-MWCNT/CPE was shown for the determination of H2O2 in real nursing product sample. It was proven that the developed mediator based (electro)catalytic platform exhibits low detection limit, high selectivity, reproducibility and stability.

Keywords

Au-MWCNT Ag-MWCNT H2O2 determination Voltammetry CPE Nursing product Mediator based electrocatalytic signal enhancement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (ON172059 and ON172012), the Hungarian GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00013 project, the CEEPUS CIII-CZ-0212-09-1516 network and the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA K120115).

References

  1. 1.
    Sitnikova NA, Borisova AV, Komkova MA, Karyakin AA (2011) Superstable advanced hydrogen peroxide transducer based on transition metal hexacyanoferrates. Anal Chem 83:2359–2363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karam P, Halaoui LI (2008) Sensing of H2O2 at low surface density assemblies of Pt nanoparticles in polyelectrolyte. Anal Chem 80:5441–5448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sang Y, Zhang L, Li YF, Chen LQ, Xu JL, Huang CZ (2010) A visual detection of hydrogen peroxide on the basis of Fenton reaction with gold nanoparticles. Anal Chim Acta 659:224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guwy AJ, Hawkes FR, Martin SR, Hawkes DL, Cunnah P (2000) A technique for monitoring hydrogen peroxide concentration off-line and on-line. Water Res 34:2191–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park JH, Cho IH, Chang SW (2006) Comparison of Fenton and photo-Fenton processes for livestock wastewater treatment. J Environ Sci Health B 41:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raoof JB, Ojani R, Hasheminejad E, Rashid-Nadimi S (2012) Electrochemical synthesis of Ag nanoparticles supported on glassy carbon electrode by means of p-isopropyl calix[6]arene matrix and its application for electrocatalytic reduction of H2O2. Appl Surf Sci 258:2788–2795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salimi A, Hallaj R, Soltanian S, Mamkhezri H (2007) Nanomolar detection of hydrogen peroxide on glassy carbon electrode modified with electrodeposited cobalt oxide nanoparticles. Anal Chim Acta 594:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu Y, Wang DW, Xu L, Hou HQ, You TY (2011) A novel and simple route to prepare a Pt nanoparticle-loaded carbon nanofiber electrode for hydrogen peroxide sensing. Biosens Bioelectron 26:4585–4590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kotzian P, Brázdilová P, Kalcher K, Vytřas K (2005) Determination of hydrogen peroxide, glucose and hypoxanthine using (bio)sensors based on ruthenium dioxide-modified screen-printed electrodes. Anal Lett 38:1099–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anojčić J, Guzsvány V, Vajdle O, Madarász D, Rónavári A, Kónya Z, Kalcher K (2016) Hydrodynamic chronoamperometric determination of hydrogen peroxide using carbon paste electrodes coated by multiwalled carbon nanotubes decorated with MnO2 or Pt particles. Sens Actuators B 233:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen S, Yuan R, Chai Y, Hu F (2013) Electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide using metal nanoparticles: a review. Microchim Acta 180:15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao C, Guo Z, Liu J-H, Huang X-J (2012) The new age of carbon nanotubes: an updated review of functionalized carbon nanotubes in electrochemical sensors. Nanoscale 4:1948–1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rajabzade H, Daneshgar P, Tazikeh E, Mehrabian RZ (2012) Functionalized carbon nanotubes with gold nanoparticles to fabricate a sensor for hydrogen peroxide determination. J Chem 9:2540–2549Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wildgoose GG, Banks CE, Compton RG (2006) Metal nanoparticles and related materials supported on carbon nanotubes: methods and applications. Small 2:182–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han KN, Li CA, Ngoc Bui M-P, Pham X-H, Kim BS, Choa YH, Seong GH (2012) Development of Pt/TiO2 nanohybrids-modified SWCNT electrode for sensitive hydrogen peroxide detection. Sens Actuators B 174:406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miao Z, Zhang D, Chen Q (2014) Non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensors based on multi-wall carbon nanotube/Pt nanoparticle nanohybrids. Materials 7:2945–2955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shi Q-C, Zeng W-F, Zhu Y-N (2009) Electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide at a waxed graphite electrode modified with platinum-decorated carbon nanotubes. J Shanghai Univ 13:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fang Y, Zhang D, Qin X, Miao Z, Takahashi S, Anzai J-I, Chen Q (2012) A non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor based on poly(vinyl alcohol)–multiwalled carbon nanotubes–platinum nanoparticles hybrids modified glassy carbon electrode. Electrochim Acta 70:266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guzmán C, Orozco G, Verde Y, Jiménez S, Godínez LA, Juaristi E, Bustos E (2009) Hydrogen peroxide sensor based on modified vitreous carbon with multiwall carbon nanotubes and composites of Pt nanoparticles–dopamine. Electrochim Acta 54:1728–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guzsvány V, Anojčić J, Radulović E, Vajdle O, Stanković I, Madarász D, Kónya Z, Kalcher K (2017) Screen-printed enzymatic glucose biosensor based on a composite made from multiwalled carbon nanotubes and palladium containing particles. Microchim Acta 184:1987–1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Afraz A, Rafati AA, Hajian A (2013) Analytical sensing of hydrogen peroxide on Ag nanoparticles–multiwalled carbon nanotube-modified glassy carbon electrode. J Solid State Electrochem 17:2017–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li X, Liu Y, Zheng L, Dong M, Xue Z, Lu X, Liu X (2013) A novel nonenzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor based on silver nanoparticles and ionic liquid functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube composite modified electrode. Electrochim Acta 113:170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shi Y, Liu Z, Zhao B, Sun Y, Xu F, Zhang Y, Wena Z, Yang H, Li Z (2011) Carbon nanotube decorated with silver nanoparticles via noncovalent interaction for a novel nonenzymatic sensor towards hydrogen peroxide reduction. J Electroanal Chem 656:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao W, Wang H, Qin X, Wang X, Zhao Z, Miao Z, Chen L, Shan M, Fang Y, Chen Q (2009) A novel nonenzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor based on multi-wall carbon nanotube/silver nanoparticle nanohybrids modified gold electrode. Talanta 80:1029–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Narang J, Chauhan N, Pundir CS (2011) A non-enzymatic sensor for hydrogen peroxide based on polyaniline, multiwalled carbon nanotubes and gold nanoparticles modified Au electrode. Analyst 136:4460–4466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lin C-Y, Lai Y-H, Balamurugan A, Vittal R, Lin C-W, Ho K-C (2010) Electrode modified with a composite film of ZnO nanorods and Ag nanoparticles as a sensor for hydrogen peroxide. Talanta 82:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guascito MR, Filippo E, Malitesta C, Manno D, Serra A, Turco A (2008) A new amperometric nanostructured sensor for the analytical determination of hydrogen peroxide. Biosens Bioelectron 24:1057–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Habibi B, Jahanbakhshi M, Pournaghi-Azar MH (2012) Voltammetric and amperometric determination of hydrogen peroxide using a carbon-ceramic electrode modified with a nanohybrid composite made from single-walled carbon nanotubes and silver nanoparticles. Microchim Acta 177:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xin F, Li L (2011) Decoration of carbon nanotubes with silver nanoparticles for advanced CNT/polymer nanocomposites. Compos A 42:961–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Niesz K, Siska A, Vesselényi I, Hernádi K, Méhn D, Galbács G, Kónya Z, Kiricsi I (2002) Mechanical and chemical breaking of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Catal Today 76:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fási A, Pálinkó I, Seo JW, Kónya Z, Hernadi K, Kiricsi I (2003) Sonication assisted gold deposition on multiwall carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 372:848–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Billing BK, Agnihotri PK, Singh N (2017) Fabrication of branched nanostructures for CNT@Ag nano-hybrids: application in CO2 gas detection. J Mater Chem C 5:4226–4235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Švancara I, Metelka R, Vytřas K (2005) Piston-driven carbon paste electrode holder for electrochemical measurements. In: Vytřas K, Kalcher K (eds) Sensing in electroanalysis, vol 1. University of Pardubice, PardubiceGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Endo M, Takeuchi K, Hiraoka T, Furuta T, Kasai T, Sun X, Kiang HC, Dresselhaus SM (1997) Stacking nature of graphene layers in carbon nanotubes and nanofibers. J Phys Chem Solids 58:1707–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Department of Applied and Environmental ChemistryUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  3. 3.MTA-SZTE Reaction Kinetics and Surface Chemistry Research GroupSzegedHungary

Personalised recommendations