CO and CO2 Methanation Over Ni/SiC and Ni/SiO2 Catalysts
- 109 Downloads
Ni/SiC and Ni/SiO2 catalysts prepared by both wet impregnation (WI) and deposition–precipitation (DP) methods were compared for CO and CO2 methanation. The prepared catalysts were characterized using N2 physisorption, temperature-programmed reduction with H2 (H2-TPR), H2 chemisorption, pulsed CO2 chemisorption, temperature-programmed desorption of CO2 (CO2-TPD), transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction. H2-TPR analysis revealed that the catalysts prepared by DP exhibit stronger interaction between the nickel oxides and support than those prepared by WI. The former catalysts exhibit higher Ni dispersions than the latter. The catalytic activities for both reactions over Ni/SiC and Ni/SiO2 catalysts prepared by WI increase on increasing the Ni content from 10 to 20 wt%. The Ni/SiC catalyst prepared by DP shows higher catalytic activity for CO and CO2 methanation than that of the Ni/SiC catalyst prepared by WI. Furthermore, it exhibits the highest catalytic activity for CO methanation among the tested catalysts. The high Ni dispersion achieved by the DP method and the high thermal conductivity enabled by SiC are beneficial for both CO and CO2 methanation.
KeywordsCO methanation CO2 methanation Ni/SiC Ni/SiO2 Deposition–precipitation method
This work was supported by the Human Resources Program in Energy Technology (No. 20154010200820) of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), which is granted financial resources from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of the Republic of Korea. This work was also supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2017R1A2B3011316).
- 30.Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Reinoso FR, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW (2015) Pure Appl Chem 87(9–10):1051–1069Google Scholar
- 31.Jesús MGV, José LV, Antonio de LC, Beatriz GM, Paula S, Fernando D (2012) Appl Catal A 431–432:49–56Google Scholar