Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 130, Issue 3, pp 969–983 | Cite as

Long-Term Evolution of Coal Permeability Under Effective Stresses Gap Between Matrix and Fracture During CO2 Injection

  • Mingyao WeiEmail author
  • Jishan Liu
  • Rui Shi
  • Derek Elsworth
  • Zhanghao Liu


Understanding the long-term evolution of coal permeability under the influence of gas adsorption-induced multiple processes is crucial for the efficient sequestration of CO2, coalbed methane extraction and enhanced coal bed methane recovery. In previous studies, coal permeability is normally measured as a function of gas pressure under the conditions of constant effective stresses, uniaxial strains and constant confining pressures. In all these experiments, an equilibrium state between coal matrix and fracture is normally assumed. This assumption has essentially excluded the effect of matrix–fracture interactions on the evolution of coal permeability. In this study, we hypothesize that the current equilibrium assumption is responsible for the discrepancy between theoretical expectations and experimental measurements. Under this hypothesis, the evolution of coal permeability is determined by the effective stress gap between coal matrix and fracture. This hypothesis is tested through an experiment of CO2 injection into a coal core under the constant effective stress. In this experiment, the effective stress in the fracture system is unchanged while the effective stress in the matrix evolves as a function of time. In the experiment, the coal permeability was measured continuously throughout the whole period of the experiment (~ 80 days). The experimental results show that the core expands rapidly at the beginning due to the gas injection-induced poroelastic effect. After the injection, the core length remains almost unchanged. But, the measured permeability declines from 60 to 0.48 μD for the first month. It rebounds slowly for the subsequent 2 months. These results indicate that the effective stress gap has a significant impact on the evolution of coal permeability. The switch of permeability from the initial reduction (the first 30 days) to rebound (the subsequent 50 days) suggests a transition of matrix deformation from nearby the fracture wall to further away area. These findings demonstrate that the evolution of coal permeability is primarily controlled by the spatial transformation of effective stresses between matrix and fracture.


Coal permeability Gas adsorption Matrix swelling Equilibrium state Effective stress gap 



This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFC0804400), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015XKZD03),the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_17R103), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. These sources of support are gratefully acknowledged. We also thank Jianhong Kang for constructive comments during the review process.


  1. Anggara, F., Sasaki, K., Sugai, Y.: The correlation between coal swelling and permeability during CO2 sequestration: a case study using Kushiro low rank coals. Int. J. Coal Geol. 166, 62–70 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baradez, M.O., Mcguckin, C.P., Forraz, N., Pettengell, R., Hoppe, A.: Robust and automated unimodal histogram thresholding and potential applications. Pattern Recogn. 37(6), 1131–1148 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brace, W.F., Walsh, J., Frangos, W.: Permeability of granite under high pressure. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 2225–2236 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bustin, A.M.M., Bustin, R.M., Russel-Houston, J.: Horseshoe canyon and belly river coal measures, south central Alberta: part 2—modeling reservoir properties and producible gas. B. Can Pet Geol. 59, 235–260 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Z.W., Pan, Z.J., Liu, J.S., Connell, L.D., Elsworth, D.: Effect of the effective stress coefficient and sorption-induced strain on the evolution of coal permeability: experimental observations. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 5(5), 1284–1293 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, D., Pan, Z.J., Ye, Z.H.: Dependence of gas shale fracture permeability on effective stress and reservoir pressure: model match and insights. Fuel 139, 383–392 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cui, X., Bustin, R.M.: Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams. AAPG Bull. 89, 1181–1202 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Danesh, N.N., Chen, Z., Connell, L.D., Kizil, M.S., Pan, Z., Aminossadati, S.M.: Characterisation of creep in coal and its impact on permeability: an experimental study. Int. J. Coal Geol. 173, 200–211 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. David, C., Wong, T.F., Zhu, W., Zhang, J.: Laboratory measurement of compaction induced permeability change in porous rocks: implications for the generation and maintenance of pore pressure excess in the crust. Pure. Appl. Geophys. 143, 425–456 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Espinoza, D., Vandamme, M., Pereira, J.-M., Dangla, P., Vidal-Gilbert, S.: Measurement and modeling of adsorptive–poromechanical properties of bituminous coal cores exposed to CO2: adsorption, swelling strains, swelling stresses and impact on fracture permeability. Int. J. Coal Geol. 134, 80–95 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Espinoza, D.N., Pereira, J.-M., Vandamme, M., Dangla, P., Vidal-Gilbert, S.: Desorption-induced shear failure of coal bed seams during gas depletion. Int. J. Coal Geol. 137, 142–151 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallagher, N., Wise, G.: A theoretical analysis of the properties of median filters. IEEE Trans. ASSP. 29, 1136–1141 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilman, A., Beckie, R.: Flow of coalbed methane to a gallery. Trans. Porous Media. 41, 1–16 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray, I.: Reservoir engineering in coal seams: part 1—the physical process of gas storage and movement in coal seams. Reserv Eng. 2(1), 28–34 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harpalani, S., Chen, G.: Estimation of changes in fracture porosity of coal with gas emision. Fuel 74(10), 1491–1498 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harpalani, S., Schraufnagel, R.A.: Shrinkage of coal matrix with release of gas and its impact on permeability of coal. Fuel 69, 551–556 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harpalani, S., Zhao, X.: The unusual response of coal permeability to varying gas pressure and effective stress. The 30th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association. (1989)Google Scholar
  18. Heller, R., Vermylen, J., Zoback, M.: Experimental investigation of matrix permeability of gas shales. AAPG Bull. 98(5), 975–995 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar, H., Elsworth, D., Liu, J.S., Pone, D., Mathews, J.P.: Optimizing enhanced coalbed methane recovery for unhindered production and CO2 injectivity. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 11(6), 86–97 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin, W., Tang, G.-Q., Kovscek, A.R.: Sorption-induced permeability change of coal during gas-injection processes. Reserv. Eval. Eng. 11, 792–802 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, J.S., Wang, J.G., Chen, Z.W., Wang, S., Elsworth, D., Jiang, Y.J.: Impact of transition from local swelling to macro swelling on the evolution of coal permeability. Int. J. Coal Geol. 88, 31–40 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, Q.Q., Cheng, Y.P., Ren, T., Jing, H.W., Tu, Q.Y., Dong, J.: Experimental observations of matrix swelling area propagation on permeability evolution using natural and reconstituted samples. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 34, 680–688 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKee, C.R., Bumb, A.C., Koeing, R.A.: Stress-dependent permeability and porosity of coal. International coalbed methane symposium. 3(1), 81–91 (1987)Google Scholar
  24. Mitra, A., Harpalani, S., Liu, S.M.: Laboratory measurement and modeling of coal permeability with continued methane production: part 1—laboratory results. Fuel 94(110), 116 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. Palmer, I., Mansoori, J.: How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds: a new model. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 1(6), 539–544 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pan, Z.J., Connell, L.D., Camilleri, M.: Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery. Int. J. Coal Geol. 82, 252–261 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pini, R., Ottiger, S., Burlini, L., Storti, G., Mazzotti, M.: Role of adsorption and swelling on the dynamics of gas injection in coal. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 114, B04203 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robertson, E.P., Christiansen, R.L.: Measurements of sorption-induced strain. Presented at the 2005 International Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 17–19 May, Paper 0532 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. Robertson, E.P., Christiansen, R.L.: A permeability model for coal and other fractured, sorptive-elastic media. SPE J. 13(3), 314–324 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reucroft, P.J., Patel, H.: Gas-induced swelling in coal. Fuel 65, 816–820 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seidle, J.P., Huitt, L.G.: Experimental measurement of coal matrix shrinkage due to gas desorption and implications for cleat permeability increase. In: SPE International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Beijing, China, 14–17 November. SPE 30010 (1995)Google Scholar
  32. Seidle, J.P., Jeansonne, M.W., Erickson, D.J.: Application of matchstick geometry to stress dependent permeability in coals. In: SPE 24361 SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting Held in Casper, Wyoming, USA, 18–21 May (1992)Google Scholar
  33. Shi, J.Q., Durucan, S.: Drawdown induced changes in permeability of coalbeds: a new interpretation of the reservoir response to primary recovery. Trans. Porous Med. 56(1), 1–16 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shi, R., Liu, J.S., Wei, M.Y., Elsworth, D., Wang, X.M.: Mechanistic analysis of coal permeability evolution data under stress-controlled conditions. Int. J. Rock Mech, Min (2018). (In revision) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siriwardane, H., Haljasmaa, I., Mclendon, R., Irdi, G., Soong, Y., Bromhal, G.: Influence of carbon dioxide on coal permeability determined by pressure transient methods. Int. J. Coal Geol. 77(1), 109–118 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Somerton, W.H., Söylemezoglu, I.M., Dudley, R.C.: Effect of stress on permeability of coal. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abst. 12(5–6), 129–145 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, Y., Liu, S.M.: Estimation of pressure-dependent diffusive permeability of coal using methane diffusion coefficient: laboratory measurements and modeling. Energy Fuels 30(11), 8968–8976 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, S., Elsworth, D., Liu, J.S.: Permeability evolution in fractured coal: the roles of fracture geometry and water-content. Int. J. Coal Geol. 87, 13–25 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, S., Elsworth, D., Liu, J.: A mechanistic model for permeability evolution in fractured sorbing media. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 117, B06205 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. Wang, C.G., Liu, J.S., Feng, J.T., Wei, M.Y., Wang, C.S., Jiang, Y.J.: Effects of gas diffusion from fractures to coal matrix on the evolution of coal strains: experimental observations. Int. J. Coal Geol. 162, 74–84 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wei, M.Y., Liu, J.S., Elsworth, D., Wang E.Y.: Triple porosity modelling for the simulation of multi-scale flow mechanisms in shale reservoirs. Geofluids, 6948726 (2018)Google Scholar
  42. Wu, Y., Liu, J.S., Elsworth, D., Chen, Z.W., Connell, L., Pan, Z.J.: Dual poroelastic response of coal seam to CO2 injection. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 4(4), 668–678 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang, H.B., Liu, J.S., Elsworth, D.: How sorption-induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams: a new FE model. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 45(8), 1226–1236 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang, S.W., Liu, J.S., Wei, M.Y., Elsworth, D.: Coal permeability maps under the influence of multiple coupled processes. Int. J. Coal Geol. 187, 71–82 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Internet Application Technology on Mine, IoT Perception Mine Research CenterChina University of Mining and TechnologyXuzhouChina
  2. 2.School of EngineeringThe University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum ResourcesChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  4. 4.Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, G3 Center and Energy InstituteThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  5. 5.State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil MechanicsChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations