Advertisement

Drag Force Calculations in Polydisperse DEM Simulations with the Coarse-Grid Method: Influence of the Weighting Method and Improved Predictions Through Artificial Neural Networks

  • Pouyan PirniaEmail author
  • François Duhaime
  • Yannic Ethier
  • Jean-Sébastien Dubé
Article
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Several methods are employed for drag force calculations with the discrete element method depending on the desired accuracy and the number of particles involved. For many applications, the fluid motion cannot be solved at the pore scale due to the heavy computational cost. Instead, the coarse-grid method (CGM) is often used. It involves solving an averaged form of the Navier–Stokes equations at the continuum scale and distributing the total drag force among the particles. For monodisperse assemblages, the total drag force can be uniformly distributed among the particles. For polydisperse assemblages, however, the total CGM drag force must be weighted. It can be applied proportionally to the volume (CGM-V) or surface (CGM-S) of each particle. This article compares the CGM-V and CGM-S weighting methods with the weighting obtained by solving the Navier–Stokes equations at the pore scale with the finite element method (FEM). Three unit cells (simple cubic, body-centered cubic and face-centered cubic) corresponding to different porosity values, (respectively, 0.477, 0.319 and 0.259) were simulated. Each unit cell involved a skeleton of large particles and a smaller particle with variable size and position. It was found that both the CGM-V and CGM-S weighting methods do not generally give accurate drag force values for the smaller particles in a polydisperse assemblage, especially for large-size ratios. An artificial neural network (ANN) was trained using the FEM drag force as the target data to predict the drag force on smaller particles in a granular skeleton. The trained ANN showed a very good agreement with the FEM results, thus presenting ANN as a possible avenue to improve drag force weighting for the coarse-grid method.

Keywords

Drag force Coarse-grid method Discrete elements Finite elements Artificial neural network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Hydro-Québec and NSERC for this project, and the helpful comments of one reviewer.

Author Contributions

PP developed the theory, calculated the drag forces and created the artificial neural network. He wrote the paper. FD developed the theory and supervised the project. He also revised and improved the manuscript. YE reviewed and edited the manuscript. JSD reviewed and edited the manuscript.

References

  1. Beetstra, R., van der Hoef, M.A., Kuipers, J.: Drag force of intermediate Reynolds number flow past mono-and bidisperse arrays of spheres. AIChE J. 53, 489–501 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brinkman, H.: A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles. Flow Turbul. Combust. 1, 27 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapuis, R.P., Aubertin, M.: On the use of the Kozeny–Carman equation to predict the hydraulic conductivity of soils. Can. Geotech. J. 40, 616–628 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chareyre, B., Cortis, A., Catalano, E., Barthélemy, E.: Pore-scale modeling of viscous flow and induced forces in dense sphere packings. Transp. Porous Media 94, 595–615 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. COMSOL: COMSOL Multiphysics. Version 5.3a (2017)Google Scholar
  6. Cook, B., Lee, M., DiGiovanni, A., Bronowski, D., Perkins, E., Williams, J.: Discrete element modeling applied to laboratory simulation of near-wellbore mechanics. Int. J. Geomech. 4, 19–27 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cundall, P.A., Strack, O.D.: A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29, 47–65 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darcy, H.: Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon: exposition et application. Victor Dalmont, Paris (1856)Google Scholar
  9. Di Felice, R.: The voidage function for fluid–particle interaction systems. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 20, 153–159 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ergun, S.: Fluid flow through packed columns. Chem. Eng. Prog. 48, 89–94 (1952)Google Scholar
  11. Esteghamatian, A., Bernard, M., Lance, M., Hammouti, A., Wachs, A.: Micro/meso simulation of a fluidized bed in a homogeneous bubbling regime. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 92, 93–111 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodarzi, M., Kwok, C.Y., Tham, L.G.: A continuum–discrete model using Darcy’s law: formulation and verification. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 39, 327–342 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagan, M.T., Menhaj, M.B.: Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 5, 989–993 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, R.J., Koch, D.L., Ladd, A.J.: The first effects of fluid inertia on flows in ordered and random arrays of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 448, 213–241 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holmes, D.W., Williams, J.R., Tilke, P.: Smooth particle hydrodynamics simulations of low Reynolds number flows through porous media. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 35, 419–437 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huilin, L., Gidaspow, D.: Hydrodynamics of binary fluidization in a riser: CFD simulation using two granular temperatures. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58, 3777–3792 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Itasca, P.D.: PFC3D (particle flow code in 3 dimensions) manual. In: ICG (ed.), Minneapolis (2004)Google Scholar
  18. Kafui, K., Thornton, C., Adams, M.: Discrete particle–continuum fluid modelling of gas–solid fluidised beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57, 2395–2410 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karn, U.: A Quick introduction to neural networks. https://ujjwalkarn.me/2016/08/09/quick-intro-neural-networks/ (2016). Accessed 1 Nov 2018
  20. Kriebitzsch, S., Van der Hoef, M., Kuipers, J.: Fully resolved simulation of a gas-fluidized bed: a critical test of DEM models. Chem. Eng. Sci. 91, 1–4 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levenberg, K.: A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q. Appl. Math. 2, 164–168 (1944)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, M., Liu, G.: Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): an overview and recent developments. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 17, 25–76 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lominé, F., Scholtès, L., Sibille, L., Poullain, P.: Modeling of fluid–solid interaction in granular media with coupled lattice Boltzmann/discrete element methods: application to piping erosion. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 37, 577–596 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marquardt, D.W.: An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11, 431–441 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Narsilio, G.A., Buzzi, O., Fityus, S., Yun, T.S., Smith, D.W.: Upscaling of Navier–Stokes equations in porous media: theoretical, numerical and experimental approach. Comput. Geotech. 36, 1200–1206 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nawi, N.M., Khan, A., Rehman, M.Z.: A new back-propagation neural network optimized with cuckoo search algorithm. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pp. 413–426. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  27. O’Sullivan, C.: Advancing geomechanics using DEM. In: International Symposium on Geomechanics from Micro to Macro, IS-Cambridge 2014, 1 September 2014–3 September 2014, pp. 21–32. Taylor and Francis, Cambridge (2015)Google Scholar
  28. Pirnia, P., Duhaime, F., Ethier, Y., Dubé, J.-S.: ICY: an interface between COMSOL multiphysics and discrete element code YADE for the modelling of porous media. Comput. Geosci. 123, 38–46 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roache, P.J.: Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 123–160 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rubinstein, G.J., Derksen, J., Sundaresan, S.: Lattice Boltzmann simulations of low-Reynolds-number flow past fluidized spheres: effect of Stokes number on drag force. J. Fluid Mech. 788, 576–601 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsuji, Y., Kawaguchi, T., Tanaka, T.: Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed. Powder Technol. 77, 79–87 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wen, C.Y.: Mechanics of fluidization. In: Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, pp. 100–111 (1966)Google Scholar
  33. Whitaker, S.: Flow in porous media I: a theoretical derivation of Darcy’s law. Transp. Porous Media 1, 3–25 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeghal, M., El Shamy, U.: A continuum-discrete hydromechanical analysis of granular deposit liquefaction. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 28, 1361–1383 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang, D.-M., Gao, C.-P., Yin, Z.-Y.: CFD–DEM modeling of seepage erosion around shield tunnels. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 83, 60–72 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu, H., Zhou, Z., Yang, R., Yu, A.: Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: theoretical developments. Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 3378–3396 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (LG2)École de technologie supérieureMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations