Advertisement

Towards artificial seeds from microspore derived embryos of Brassica napus

  • Mohammed Cassim Mohammed IqbalEmail author
  • Christian Möllers
Review
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Microspore derived embryos are haploid and their immediate diploidization generates doubled haploid homozygous plants, whereas a normal breeding process would take 7–8 generations to attain homozygosity. However, the flexibility available in conventional seeds—storage, transport, variable planting time, and handling—is not possible with microspore derived embryos in breeding programs; they are continuously growing from induction of embryogenesis to planting in the soil, without a pause. Artificial seed technology can by-pass the expensive and time-consuming process of acclimatizing and loss of in vitro derived embryos in the green house. The doubled haploid technology in Brassica species has advanced considerably on many fronts—reliable induction of embryogenesis, in vitro diploidization, desiccation and conversion of embryos to plantlets. Although microspore derived embryos are bipolar, they are not considered within the scheme of artificial seeds. The development of artificial seeds in brassica, however, needs the input from other biotechnologies to develop vigorous embryos capable of conversion to plants. It is now necessary for empirical research on microspore derived embryos of Brassica to expand the applications available to the plant breeder by including the biotechnologies of encapsulation and embryo priming to develop artificial seeds. The objective of this review is to draw the attention of researchers to make the transition from microspore-derived embryos to artificial seeds in Brassica crop species, by bringing together relevant studies from the relevant biotechnologies. This would expand the present scope of artificial seeds and thus provide more options and flexibility to the Brassica plant breeder.

Key message

Artificial seeds from microspore derived embryos enhance breeding of Brassica species.

Keywords

Artificial seeds Microspore-derived embryos Conversion of embryos Brassica species Encapsulation Artificial endosperm Priming embryos 

Abbreviations

ABA

Abscisic acid

BAP

6-Benzylaminopurine

B5

Gamborg’s medium

DH

Doubled haploid

GA3

Gibberellic acid

IBA

Indole butyric acid

MS

Murashige and Skoog medium

NAA

Naphthalene acetic acid

Notes

Acknowledgements

MCMI wishes to thank the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD), Germany, and the Erasmus Mundus Experts Sustain programme for research fellowships, and the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka for a travel award.

Author contributions

The review was conceived by both authors. MCMI wrote the manuscript with inputs from CM who also revised the drafts. Both authors read and approved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Agarwal PPKP, Agarwal PPKP, Custers JBMM et al (2006) PCIB an antiauxin enhances microspore embryogenesis in microspore culture of Brassica juncea. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 86:201–210.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9108-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadi B, Alizadeh K, Teixeira da Silva JA (2012) Enhanced regeneration of haploid plantlets from microspores of Brassica napus L. using bleomycin, PCIB, and phytohormones. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 109:525–533.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0119-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmadi B, Shariatpanahi ME, Teixeira da Silva JA (2014) Efficient induction of microspore embryogenesis using abscisic acid, jasmonic acid and salicylic acid in Brassica napus L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 116:343–351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0408-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aitken-Christie J, Kozai T, Takayama S (1995) Automation in plant tissue culture—general introduction and overview. Automation and environmental control in plant tissue culture. Springer, New York, pp 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anandarajah K, Kott L, Beversdorf WD, McKersie BD (1991) Induction of desiccation tolerance in microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus L. by thermal stress. Plant Sci 77:119–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(91)90187-d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angelovici R, Galili G, Fernie AR, Fait A (2010) Seed desiccation: a bridge between maturation and germination. Trends Plant Sci 15:211–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antonietta GM, Ahmad HI, Maurizio M, Alvaro S (2007) Preliminary research on conversion of encapsulated somatic embryos of Citrus reticulata Blanco, cv. Mandarino Tardivo di Ciaculli. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 88:117–120.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9185-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ara H, Jaiswal U, Jaiswal VS (2000) Synthetic seed: prospects and limitations. Curr, SciGoogle Scholar
  9. Baillie AMR, Epp DJ, Hutcheson D, Keller WA (1992) In vitro culture of isolated microspores and regeneration of plants in Brassica campestris. Plant Cell Rep 11:234–237Google Scholar
  10. Bewley JD (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell Online 9:1055–1066.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.7.1055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhowmik P, Dirpaul J, Polowick P, Ferrie AMRR (2011) A high throughput Brassica napus microspore culture system: influence of percoll gradient separation and bud selection on embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 106:359–362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9913-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown DCW, Watson EM, Pechan PM (1993) Induction of desiccation tolerance in microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus. Vitr Cell Dev Biol 29P:113–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02632281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cangahuala-Inocente GC, Dal Vesco LL, Steinmacher D et al (2007) Improvements in somatic embryogenesis protocol in Feijoa (Acca sellowiana (Berg) Burret): induction, conversion and synthetic seeds. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 111:228–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.10.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardoza V, Stewart CN (2004) Brassica biotechnology: progress in cellular and molecular biology. Vitr Cell Dev Biol 40:542–551.  https://doi.org/10.1079/ivp2004568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cegielska-Taras T, Tykarska T, Szala L et al (2002) Direct plant development from microspore-derived embryos of winter oilseed rape Brassica napus (L). ssp. oleifera (DC). (Metzger). Euphytica 124:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chanana NP, Dhawan V, Bhojwani SS (2005) Morphogenesis in isolated microspore cultures of Brassica juncea. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 83:169–177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-4855-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen ZZ, Snyder S, Fan ZG, Loh WH (1994) Efficient production of doubled haploid plants through chromosome doubling of isolated microspores in Brassica napus. Plant Breed 113:217–221.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1994.tb00725.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrie AMR, Caswell KL (2011) Isolated microspore culture techniques and recent progress for haploid and doubled haploid plant production. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 104:301–309.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9800-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrie AMR, Keller WA (2007) Optimization of methods for using polyethylene glycol as a non-permeating osmoticum for the induction of microspore embryogenesis in the Brassicaceae. Vitr Cell Dev Biol 43:348–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-007-9053-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrie AMR, Möllers C (2011) Haploids and doubled haploids in Brassica spp. for genetic and genomic research. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104:375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrie AMR, Taylor DC, MacKenzie SL, Keller WA (1999) Microspore embryogenesis of high sn-2 erucic acid Brassica oleracea germplasm. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 57:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forster BP, Heberle-Bors E, Kasha KJ, Touraev A (2007) The resurgence of haploids in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci 12:368–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gamborg OL, Miller R, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gantait S, Kundu S, Ali MN (2015) Influence of encapsulating agent and matrix levels on synseed production of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Pennell. Med Plants 7:182–187.  https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6892.2015.00026.x Google Scholar
  25. Germanà MA (2011a) Gametic embryogenesis and haploid technology as valuable support to plant breeding. Plant Cell Rep 30:839–857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1061-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Germanà MA (2011b) Anther culture for haploid and doubled haploid production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104:283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray DDJ, Purohit A, Triglano RN (1991) Somatic embryogenesis and development of synthetic seed technology. 10:33–61.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689109382306 Google Scholar
  28. Gu HH, Zhou WJ, Hagberg P (2003) High frequency spontaneous production of doubled haploid plants in microspore cultures of Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis. Euphytica 134:239–245.  https://doi.org/10.1023/b:euph.0000004945.01455.6d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haddadi P, Moieni A, Karimzadeh G, Abdollahi MR (2008) Effects of gibberellin, abscisic acid and embryo desiccation on normal plantlet regeneration, secondary embryogenesis and callogenesis in microspore culture of Brassica napus L. Int J Plant Prod 2:153–162Google Scholar
  30. Hansen M (2000) ABA treatment and desiccation of microspore-derived embryos of cabbage (Brassica oleracea ssp. capitata L.) improves plant development. J Plant Physiol 156:164–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0176-1617(00)80301-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansen NJP, Andersen SB (1996) In viro chrommme doubling potential of colchicine, oryzalih, trifluralin, and APM in Brassica napus micruspore culture. Euphytica 88:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hilhorst HW, Finch-Savage WE, Buitink J, Bolingue W, Leubner-Metzger G (2010) Dormancy in plant seeds. In: Dormancy and resistance in harsh environments. Springer, pp 43–67Google Scholar
  33. Huang B, Bird S, Kemble R et al (1991) Plant regeneration from microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus: effect of embryo age, culture temperature, osmotic pressure, and abscisic acid. Vitr Cell Dev Biol 27:28–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ilić-Grubor K, Attree SM, Fowke LC (1998) Induction of microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus L. with polyethylene glycol (PEG) as osmoticum in a low sucrose medium. Plant Cell Rep 17:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Iqbal MCM, Möllers C, Röbbelen G (1994) Increased embryogenesis after colchicine treatment of microspore cultures of Brassica napus L. J Plant Physiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0176-1617(11)81691-3 Google Scholar
  36. Johnson-Flanagan AM, Huiwen Z, Geng XM et al (1992) Frost, abscisic acid, and desiccation hasten embryo development in Brassica napus. Plant Physiol 99:700–706.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.2.700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kalischuk ML, Johnson D, Kawchuk LM (2015) Priming with a double-stranded DNA virus alters Brassica rapa seed architecture and facilitates a defense response. Gene 557:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kermode AR (1995) Regulatory mechanisms in the transition from seed development to germination: interactions between the embryo and the seed environment. Seed Dev Germination 41:273Google Scholar
  39. Kermode AR (2005) Role of abscisic acid in seed dormancy. J Plant Growth Regul 24:319–344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-005-0110-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kott LS, Beversdorf WD (1990) Enhanced plant regeneration from microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus by chilling, partial desiccation and age selection. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00034430 Google Scholar
  41. Kubala S, Wojtyla L, Quinet M et al (2015) Enhanced expression of the proline synthesis gene P5CSA in relation to seed osmopriming improvement of Brassica napus germination under salinity stress. J Plant Physiol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2015.04.009 Google Scholar
  42. Kumar MBA, Vakeswaran V, Krishnasamy V (2005) Enhancement of synthetic seed conversion to seedlings in hybrid rice. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 81:97–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-004-2448-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lambardi M, Benelli C, Ozudogru EA, Ozden-Tokatli Y (2006) Synthetic seed technology in ornamental plants. Floric Ornam plant Biotechnol Adv Top Issues 2:347–354Google Scholar
  44. Li T, Zhang Y, Wang D et al (2017) Regulation of seed vigor by manipulation of raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) in maize and Arabidopsis. Mol Plant.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2017.10.014 Google Scholar
  45. Lichter R (1982) Induction of haploid plants from isolated pollen of Brassica napus. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 105:427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lionneton E, Beuret W, Delaitre C et al (2001) Improved microspore culture and doubled-haploid plant regeneration in the brown condiment mustard (Brassica juncea). Plant Cell Rep 20:126–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Macovei A, Pagano A, Leonetti P et al (2017) Systems biology and genome-wide approaches to unveil the molecular players involved in the pre-germinative metabolism: implications on seed technology traits. Plant Cell Rep 36:669–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Malabadi RB, Van Staden J (2005) Storability and germination of sodium alginate encapsulated somatic embryos derived from the vegetative shoot apices of mature Pinus patula trees. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 82:259–265.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-1313-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mamiya K, Sakamoto Y (2001) A method to produce encapsulatable units for synthetic seeds in Asparagus officinalis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 64:27–32.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010620313812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McDonald MB (2000) Seed priming. In: Black M, Bewley JD (eds) Seed technology and its biological basis. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, pp 287–325Google Scholar
  51. McKersie BD, Brown DCW (1996) Somatic embryogenesis and artificial seeds in forage legumes. Seed Sci Res 6:109–126.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0960258500003135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Micheli M, Pellegrino S, Piccioni E, Standardi A (2002) Effects of double encapsulation and coating on synthetic seed conversion in M.26 apple rootstock. J Microencapsul 19:347–356.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02652040110105337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mohammadi PP, Moieni A, Ebrahimi A, Javidfar F (2012) Doubled haploid plants following colchicine treatment of microspore-derived embryos of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 108:251–256.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-0036-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Möllers C, Iqbal MCM (2009) Doubled haploids in breeding winter oilseed rape. Advances in haploid production in higher plants. Springer, New York, pp 161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Möllers C, Iqbal MCM, Röbbelen G (1994) Efficient production of doubled haploid Brassica napus plants by colchicine treatment of microspores. Euphytica 75:95–104.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00024536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Murashige T (1977) Plant cell and organ cultures as horticultural practices. Symp Tissue Cult Horticult Purp 78:17–30Google Scholar
  57. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nambara E, Okamoto M, Tatematsu K et al (2010) Abscisic acid and the control of seed dormancy and germination. Seed Sci Res 20:55–67.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0960258510000012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nieves N, Lorenzo JC, Blanco MDLA et al (1998) Artificial endosperm of Cleopatra tangerine zygotic embryos: a model for somatic embryo encapsulation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 54:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nieves N, Martinez ME, Castillo R et al (2001) Effect of abscisic acid and jasmonic acid on partial desiccation of encapsulated somatic embryos of sugarcane. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 65:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nieves N, Zambrano Y, Tapia R et al (2003) Field performance of artificial seed-derived sugarcane plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 75:279–282.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025855611981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nitsch JP, Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science 163:85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nowak J, Shulaev J, Shulaev V (2003) Priming for transplant stress resistance in In vitro propagation. Vitr Cell Dev Biol 39:107–124.  https://doi.org/10.1079/ivp2002403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Onishi N, Sakamoto Y, Hirosawa T (1994) Synthetic seeds as an application of mass production of somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 39:137–145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00033921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Paparella S, Araújo SS, Rossi G et al (2015) Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Rep 34:1281–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-015-1784-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Park JI, Ahmed NU, Kim HR, Nou IS (2012) Advances in in vitro culture of the Brassicaceae crop plants. J Plant Biotechnol 39:13–22.  https://doi.org/10.5010/jpb.2012.39.1.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pintos B, Bueno MA, Cuenca B, Manzanera JA (2008) Synthetic seed production from encapsulated somatic embryos of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) and automated growth monitoring. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 95:217–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9435-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pomeroy K, Brown DCWW, Takahata Y (1994) Response of Brassica napus L. Microspore-derived embryos to exogenous abscisic acid and desiccation. In Vitro 30:196–203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02823032 Google Scholar
  69. Prem D, Gupta K, Sarkar G, Agnihotri A (2008) Activated charcoal induced high frequency microspore embryogenesis and efficient doubled haploid production in Brassica juncea. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 93:269–282.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9373-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Prem D, Solís MT, Bárány I et al (2012) A new microspore embryogenesis system under low temperature which mimics zygotic embryogenesis initials, expresses auxin and efficiently regenerates doubled-haploid plants in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-127 Google Scholar
  71. Prewein C, Wilhelm E (2003) Plant regeneration from encapsulated somatic embryos of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). Vitr Cell Dev Biol 39:613–617.  https://doi.org/10.1079/ivp2003453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Priscila CR, Castellanos BH, Ríos LD et al (2009) Encapsulated somatic embryos and zygotic embryos for obtaining artificial seeds of rauli-beech (Nothofagus alpina (Poepp. & Endl.) Oerst.). Chil J Agric Res 69:112–118.  https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-58392009000100014 Google Scholar
  73. Rai MK, Asthana P, Singh SK et al (2009) The encapsulation technology in fruit plants—a review. Biotechnol Adv 27:671–679.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Redenbaugh K (1993) Hydrated coatings for synthetic seeds. In: Synseeds-applications of synthetic seeds to crop improvement. CRC Press, pp 35–46Google Scholar
  75. Rihan HZ, Al-Issawi M, Burchett S, Fuller MP (2011) Encapsulation of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var botrytis) microshoots as artificial seeds and their conversion and growth in commercial substrates. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 107:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rihan HZ, Al-Issawi M, Burchett S, Fuller MP (2012) Artificial seed production from encapsulated microshoots of cauliflower (Brassica oleraceae var botrytis). Acta Hortic 961:419–425.  https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2012.961.55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rudolf K, Bohanec B, Hansen M (1999) Microspore culture of white cabbage, Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.: genetic improvement of non-responsive cultivars and effect of genome doubling agents. Plant Breed 118:237–241.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.1999.118003237.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Senaratna T, McKersie BD, Bowley SR (1990) Artificial seeds of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Induction of desiccation tolerance in somatic embryos. Vitr Cell Dev Biol 26:85–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02624160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Senaratna T, Kott L, Beversdorf WD, McKersie BD (1991) Desiccation of microspore derived embryos of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Cell Rep 10:342–344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00193155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sharma S, Shahzad A, Teixeira da Silva JA (2013) Synseed technology—a complete synthesis. Biotechnol Adv 31:186–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shu K, Liu XD, Xie Q, He ZH (2016) Two faces of one seed: hormonal regulation of dormancy and germination. Mol Plant 9:34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Siong PK, Mohajer S, Taha RM (2012) Production of artificial seeds derived from encapsulated in vitro micro shoots of cauliflower, Brassica oleracea var. Botrytis. Rom Biotechnol Lett 17:7549–7556Google Scholar
  83. Standardi A, Piccioni E (1998) Recent perspectives on synthetic seed technology using nonembryogenic in vitro—derived explants. Int J Plant Sci 159:968–978.  https://doi.org/10.1086/314087 Google Scholar
  84. Swamy MK, Balasubramanya S, Anuradha M (2009) Germplasm conservation of patchouli (Pogostemon cablin Benth.) by encapsulation of in vitro derived nodal segments. Int J Biodivers Conserv 8:224–230Google Scholar
  85. Takahashi Y, Yokoi S, Takahata Y (2012) Effects of genotypes and culture conditions on microspore embryogenesis and plant regeneration in several subspecies of Brassica rapa L. Plant Biotechnol Rep 6:297–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-012-0224-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Takahata Y, Keller WA (1991) High frequency embryogenesis and plant regeneration in isolated microspore culture of Brassica oleracea L. Plant Sci 74:235–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(91)90051-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Takahata Y, Brown DCW, Keller WA, Kaizuma N (1993) Dry artificial seeds and desiccation tolerance induction in microspore-derived embryos of broccoli. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 35:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Takahata Y, Fukuoka H, Wakui K (2005) Utilization of microspore-derived embryos. Haploids in Crop Improvement II. Springer, New York, pp 153–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tay L-F, Khoh L-K, Loh C-S, Khor E (1993) Alginate–chitosan coacervation in production of artificial seeds. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:449–454.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260420407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tian H, Yao CY, Sun MX (2004) High frequency conversion of microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus cv. Topas by supplemental calcium and vitamins. Dev Biol 76:159–165Google Scholar
  91. Wakui K, Takahata Y, Kaizuma N (1994) Effect of abscisic acid and high osmoticum concentration on the induction of desiccation tolerance in microspore-derived embryos of Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L.). Jpn J Breed 44:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wakui K, Takahata Y, Kaizuma N (1999) Scanning electron microscopy of desiccation-tolerant and-sensitive microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus L. Plant Cell Rep 18:595–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wang Y, Tong Y, Li Y et al (2011) High frequency plant regeneration from microspore-derived embryos of ornamental kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala). Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 130:296–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Weber S, Ünker F, Friedt W (2005) Improved doubled haploid production protocol for Brassica napus using microspore colchicine treatment in vitro and ploidy determination by flow cytometry. Plant Breed 124:511–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Welbaum GE, Shen Z, Oluoch MO, Jett LW (1998) The evolution and effects of priming vegetable seeds. Seed Technol 20:209–235.  https://doi.org/10.2307/23433024 Google Scholar
  96. Zhang YS, Khademhosseini A (2017) Advances in engineering hydrogels. Science 356:eaaf3627.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhang GQ, Zhang DQ, Tang GX et al (2006) Plant development from microspore-derived embryos in oilseed rape as affected by chilling, desiccation and cotyledon excision. Biol Plant 50:180–186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-006-0004-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zhang Y, Wang A, Liu Y et al (2011) Effects of the antiauxin PCIB on microspore embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Brassica rapa. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 130:32–37Google Scholar
  99. Zhou WJ, Hagberg P, Tang GX (2002) Increasing embryogenesis and doubling efficiency by immediate colchicine treatment of isolated microspores in spring Brassica napus. Euphytica 128:27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020687517888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant and Environmental Sciences, National Institute of Fundamental StudiesKandySri Lanka
  2. 2.Department of Crop SciencesGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations