Advertisement

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 373–381 | Cite as

Gender differences in thrombogenicity among patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease

  • Rahul Chaudhary
  • Ajaypaul Sukhi
  • Rohit Chaudhary
  • Manila Jindal
  • Ankit Vyas
  • Amit Rout
  • Kevin Bliden
  • Udaya Tantry
  • Paul GurbelEmail author
Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

Women more often present with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) and have poorer clinical outcomes than men. These findings may be related to sex associated differences in inflammation and thrombogenicity. Consecutive patients (n = 134) with ANOCA (luminal diameter stenosis < 50%) undergoing elective cardiac catheterization were included in post hoc analysis of Multi-Analyte, thrombogenic, and Genetic Markers of Atherosclerosis (MAGMA, NCT01276678) study. Patients with prior revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting or myocardial infarction were excluded. Blood for thromboelastography, oxidized LDL β2-glycoprotein complex (AtherOx), oxidized-LDL, lipid profile, and urine for 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (dTxB2) were obtained before catheterization. All women (n = 75) were post-menopausal and tended to be older than men (61.4 ± 10.6 vs. 58.6 ± 9.9 year, p = 0.12), and were significantly more thrombogenic with higher thrombin-induced platelet–fibrin strength (TIP–FCS, mm) (68.0 ± 4.5 vs. 64.5 ± 6.2 mm, p = 0.001), clotting index (0.35 ± 2.22 vs. − 0.72 ± 2.75, p = 0.02), K (measure of the speed to reach 20 mm of clot strength from an amplitude of 2 mm) (2.2 ± 1.6 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 min, p = 0.01), and fibrinogen activity (degrees) (66.6 ± 7.1 vs. 62.9 ± 7.5, p = 0.009). Markers of inflammation were not significantly different between the two groups. Women had higher total cholesterol, total LDL, LDL subtypes 1 and 2, total HDL, HDL subtypes 2 and 3, and ApoA1 (p < 0.05 for all). On multivariate regression, TIP–FCS remained significantly higher in women (p < 0.0001). Women with ANOCA are more thrombogenic than men. This fundamental difference in thrombogenicity may affect gender-related outcomes and warrants further investigation.

Keywords

Non-obstructive CAD ANOCA Cardiovascular outcomes Coronary artery disease Thrombogenicity TEG 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a research grant from Sinai Hospital of Baltimore. Thromboelastography supplies were provided by Haemonetics® Corp. VAP© testing was provided by Atherotech® Inc. Urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 and AtherOx testing were provided by Corgenix Medical Corp. We wish to acknowledge Tania Gesheff RN, MSN, Kiran Kalra, MBBS, and Cescelle Barbour RN, MSN for their contributions to this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Paul Gurbel reports serving as a consultant for Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Accumetrics, Merck, Medtronic, Janssen, CSL, and Haemonetics; receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, CSL, AstraZeneca, Haemetics, Harvard Clinical Research Institute, and Duke Clinical Research Institute; receiving payment for lectures, including service on speakers’ bureaus, from Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, and Merck; receiving payment for development of educational presentations from Merck, the Discovery Channel, and Pri-Med; Dr. Gurbel is holding stock or stock options in Merck, Medtronic, and Pfizer; and holding patents in the area of personalized antiplatelet therapy and interventional cardiology. No other authors report any potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee BK, Lim HS, Fearon WF, Yong AS, Yamada R, Tanaka S, Lee DP, Yeung AC, Tremmel JA (2015) Invasive evaluation of patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation 131(12):1054–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gehrie ER, Reynolds HR, Chen AY, Neelon BH, Roe MT, Gibler WB, Ohman EM, Newby LK, Peterson ED, Hochman JS (2009) Characterization and outcomes of women and men with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) quality improvement initiative. Am Heart J 158(4):688–694.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berger JS, Elliott L, Gallup D, Roe M, Granger CB, Armstrong PW, Simes RJ, White HD, Van de Werf F, Topol EJ, Hochman JS, Newby LK, Harrington RA, Califf RM, Becker RC, Douglas PS (2009) Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 302(8):874–882.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrom SZ, Pedersen F, Galatius S, Madsen JK, Jorgensen E, Kelbaek H, Prescott E (2012) Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J 33(6):734–744.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pepine CJ, Ferdinand KC, Shaw LJ, Light-McGroary KA, Shah RU, Gulati M, Duvernoy C, Walsh MN, Bairey Merz CN (2015) Emergence of nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a woman’s problem and need for change in definition on angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(17):1918–1933.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scalone G, Niccoli G, Crea F (2019) Editor’s choice-Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of MINOCA: an update. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 8(1):54–62.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872618782414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patel MR, Chen AY, Peterson ED, Newby LK, Pollack CV Jr, Brindis RG, Gibson CM, Kleiman NS, Saucedo JF, Bhatt DL, Gibler WB, Ohman EM, Harrington RA, Roe MT (2006) Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and insignificant coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) initiative. Am Heart J 152(4):641–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sedlak TL, Lee M, Izadnegahdar M, Merz CN, Gao M, Humphries KH (2013) Sex differences in clinical outcomes in patients with stable angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 166(1):38–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gulati M, Cooper-DeHoff RM, McClure C, Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Handberg EM, Zineh I, Kelsey SF, Arnsdorf MF, Black HR, Pepine CJ, Merz CN (2009) Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project. Arch Intern Med 169(9):843–850.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Buchthal SD, Bairey Merz CN, Kim HW, Scott KN, Doyle M, Olson MB, Pepine CJ, den Hollander J, Sharaf B, Rogers WJ, Mankad S, Forder JR, Kelsey SF, Pohost GM (2004) Prognosis in women with myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary disease: results from the National Institutes of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation 109(24):2993–2999.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000130642.79868.B2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minha S, Gottlieb S, Magalhaes MA, Gavrielov-Yusim N, Krakover R, Goldenberg I, Vered Z, Blatt A (2014) Characteristics and management of patients with acute coronary syndrome and normal or non-significant coronary artery disease: results from Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) 2004–2010. J Invasive Cardiol 26(8):389–393Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brolin EB, Jernberg T, Brismar TB, Daniel M, Henareh L, Ripsweden J, Tornvall P, Cederlund K (2014) Coronary plaque burden, as determined by cardiac computed tomography, in patients with myocardial infarction and angiographically normal coronary arteries compared to healthy volunteers: a prospective multicenter observational study. PLoS ONE 9(6):e99783.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, Reis SE, Smith KM, Handberg EM, Johnson BD, Sopko G, Bairey Merz CN (2010) Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(25):2825–2832.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ (2011) Syndrome X and microvascular coronary dysfunction. Circulation 124(13):1477–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.974212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reynolds HR, Srichai MB, Iqbal SN, Slater JN, Mancini GB, Feit F, Pena-Sing I, Axel L, Attubato MJ, Yatskar L, Kalhorn RT, Wood DA, Lobach IV, Hochman JS (2011) Mechanisms of myocardial infarction in women without angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation 124(13):1414–1425.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khuddus MA, Pepine CJ, Handberg EM, Bairey Merz CN, Sopko G, Bavry AA, Denardo SJ, McGorray SP, Smith KM, Sharaf BL, Nicholls SJ, Nissen SE, Anderson RD (2010) An intravascular ultrasound analysis in women experiencing chest pain in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: a substudy from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). J Interv Cardiol 23(6):511–519.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00598.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Cohen E, Navickas IA, Singla A, Antonino MJ, Fissha M, Kreutz RP, Bassi AK, Tantry US (2008) Race and sex differences in thrombogenicity: risk of ischemic events following coronary stenting. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 19(4):268–275.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0b013e3282ff76ae CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lev EI, Bliden KP, Jeong YH, Pandya S, Kang K, Franzese C, Tantry US, Gurbel PA (2014) Influence of race and sex on thrombogenicity in a large cohort of coronary artery disease patients. J Am Heart Assoc 3(5):e001167.  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Austin MA, Brunzell JD, Fitch WL, Krauss RM (1990) Inheritance of low density lipoprotein subclass patterns in familial combined hyperlipidemia. Arteriosclerosis 10(4):520–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chaudhary R, Bliden KP, Garg J, Mohammed N, Tantry U, Mathew D, Toth PP, Franzese C, Gesheff M, Pandya S, Gurbel P (2016) Statin therapy and inflammation in patients with diabetes treated with high dose aspirin. J Diabetes Complicat 30(7):1365–1370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Guyer K, Cho PW, Zaman KA, Kreutz RP, Bassi AK, Tantry US (2005) Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(10):1820–1826.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bairey Merz CN, Shaw LJ, Reis SE, Bittner V, Kelsey SF, Olson M, Johnson BD, Pepine CJ, Mankad S, Sharaf BL, Rogers WJ, Pohost GM, Lerman A, Quyyumi AA, Sopko G, Investigators W (2006) Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(3 Suppl):S21–S29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chiha J, Mitchell P, Gopinath B, Plant AJH, Kovoor P, Thiagalingam A (2015) Gender differences in the severity and extent of coronary artery disease. IJC Heart Vasc 8:161–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dreyer RP, Smolderen KG, Strait KM, Beltrame JF, Lichtman JH, Lorenze NP, D’Onofrio G, Bueno H, Krumholz HM, Spertus JA (2016) Gender differences in pre-event health status of young patients with acute myocardial infarction: a VIRGO study analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 5(1):43–54.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872615568967 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gupta A, Wang Y, Spertus JA, Geda M, Lorenze N, Nkonde-Price C, D’Onofrio G, Lichtman JH, Krumholz HM (2014) Trends in acute myocardial infarction in young patients and differences by sex and race, 2001 to 2010. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(4):337–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Han SH, Bae JH, Holmes DR Jr, Lennon RJ, Eeckhout E, Barsness GW, Rihal CS, Lerman A (2008) Sex differences in atheroma burden and endothelial function in patients with early coronary atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J 29(11):1359–1369.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bliden KP, Chaudhary R, Lopez LR, Damrongwatanasuk R, Guyer K, Gesheff MG, Franzese CJ, Kaza H, Tantry US, Gurbel PA (2016) Oxidized low-density lipoprotein-beta2-glycoprotein I complex but not free oxidized ldl is associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 118(5):673–678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zakynthinos E, Pappa N (2009) Inflammatory biomarkers in coronary artery disease. J Cardiol 53(3):317–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2008.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koenig W, Karakas M, Zierer A, Herder C, Baumert J, Meisinger C, Thorand B (2011) Oxidized LDL and the risk of coronary heart disease: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Study. Clin Chem 57(8):1196–1200.  https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.165134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brolin EB, Agewall S, Cederlund K, Ekenback C, Henareh L, Malmqvist K, Ruck A, Svensson A, Tornvall P (2017) Plasma biomarker levels and non-obstructive coronary artery disease determined by coronary computed tomography angiography. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12407 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim JA, Montagnani M, Chandrasekran S, Quon MJ (2012) Role of lipotoxicity in endothelial dysfunction. Heart Fail Clin 8(4):589–607.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfc.2012.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Steinberg HO, Bayazeed B, Hook G, Johnson A, Cronin J, Baron AD (1997) Endothelial dysfunction is associated with cholesterol levels in the high normal range in humans. Circulation 96(10):3287–3293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Duvillard L, Pont F, Florentin E, Galland-Jos C, Gambert P, Verges B (2000) Metabolic abnormalities of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in non-insulin-dependent diabetes: a stable isotope kinetic study. Eur J Clin Invest 30(8):685–694Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koh KK, Quon MJ, Han SH, Lee Y, Ahn JY, Kim SJ, Koh Y, Shin EK (2008) Simvastatin improves flow-mediated dilation but reduces adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity in hypercholesterolemic patients. Diabetes Care 31(4):776–782.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Persegol L, Verges B, Foissac M, Gambert P, Duvillard L (2006) Inability of HDL from type 2 diabetic patients to counteract the inhibitory effect of oxidised LDL on endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. Diabetologia 49(6):1380–1386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0244-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Besler C, Heinrich K, Rohrer L, Doerries C, Riwanto M, Shih DM, Chroni A, Yonekawa K, Stein S, Schaefer N, Mueller M, Akhmedov A, Daniil G, Manes C, Templin C, Wyss C, Maier W, Tanner FC, Matter CM, Corti R, Furlong C, Lusis AJ, von Eckardstein A, Fogelman AM, Luscher TF, Landmesser U (2011) Mechanisms underlying adverse effects of HDL on eNOS-activating pathways in patients with coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest 121(7):2693–2708.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI42946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Britten MB, Zeiher AM, Schachinger V (2004) Microvascular dysfunction in angiographically normal or mildly diseased coronary arteries predicts adverse cardiovascular long-term outcome. Coron Artery Dis 15(5):259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pepine CJ (2015) Multiple causes for ischemia without obstructive coronary artery disease: not a short list. Circulation 131(12):1044–1046.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bliden KP, Tantry US, Gesheff MG, Franzese CJ, Pandya S, Toth PP, Mathew DP, Chaudhary R, Gurbel PA (2016) Thrombin-induced platelet–fibrin clot strength identified by thrombelastography: a novel prothrombotic marker of coronary artery stent restenosis. J Interv Cardiol 29(2):168–178.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahul Chaudhary
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ajaypaul Sukhi
    • 1
  • Rohit Chaudhary
    • 4
  • Manila Jindal
    • 5
  • Ankit Vyas
    • 5
  • Amit Rout
    • 1
  • Kevin Bliden
    • 5
  • Udaya Tantry
    • 6
  • Paul Gurbel
    • 7
    Email author
  1. 1.Sinai Hospital of BaltimoreBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Division of Hospital Internal MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  4. 4.Peter Lee AssociatesSydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Inova Center for Thrombosis Research and Drug DevelopmentInova Heart and Vascular InstituteFairfaxUSA
  6. 6.Platelet and Thrombosis ResearchBaltimoreUSA
  7. 7.Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Research, Inova Center for Thrombosis Research and Drug DevelopmentInova Heart and Vascular InstituteFalls ChurchUSA

Personalised recommendations