Advertisement

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 500–505 | Cite as

Creatinine monitoring patterns in the setting of direct oral anticoagulant therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation

  • Martin M. GrucaEmail author
  • Yun Li
  • Xiaowen Kong
  • Deborah DeCamillo
  • Eva Kline-Rogers
  • Mona A. Ali
  • Scott Kaatz
  • Musa Dahu
  • James B. Froehlich
  • Geoffrey D. Barnes
Article

Abstract

Guidelines and experts note that patients with atrial fibrillation require regular renal function monitoring to ensure safe use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Insufficient monitoring could lead to inappropriate dosing and adverse events. Our objective was to describe the frequency of insufficient creatinine monitoring among patients on DOACs, and to describe clinical factors associated with insufficient monitoring. We hypothesized that renal impairment would be associated with insufficient monitoring. A retrospective cohort study was performed with data from the Michigan Anticoagulant Quality Improvement Initiative. Patients were included if they initiated DOAC therapy for stroke prevention related to atrial fibrillation, remained on therapy for ≥ 1 year, and had baseline creatinine and weight measurements. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was calculated via Cockcroft-Gault equation. Our outcome was the presence of insufficient creatinine monitoring, defined as: < 1 creatinine level/year for patients with CrCl > 50, or < 2 creatinine levels/year for patients with CrCl ≤ 50. Multivariable analysis was done via logistic regression. Study population included 511 patients. In overall, 14.0% of patients received insufficient monitoring. Among patients with CrCl > 50, 11.5% had < 1 creatinine level/year. Among patients with CrCl ≤ 50, 27.1% received < 2 creatinine levels/year. Baseline renal dysfunction was associated with a higher likelihood of insufficient creatinine monitoring (adjusted odds ratio 3.64, 95% confidence interval 1.81–7.29). This shows a significant gap in the monitoring of patients on DOACs—patients with renal impairment are already at higher risk for adverse events. Future studies are needed to describe the barriers in monitoring these patients and to identify how to optimally address them.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation Creatinine Factor Xa inhibitors Kidney diseases Drug monitoring 

Notes

Author contributions

Concept and design: MMG, YL, EKR, MAA, SK, MD, JBF, GDB. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: YL, XK, DD. Drafting of the manuscript: MMG. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: MMG, YL, XK, DD, EKR, MAA, SK, MD, JBF, GDB. Statistical analysis: YL, XK. Obtained funding: JBF, GDB Administrative, technical, or material support: MMG, YL, XK, DD, EKR, MAA, SK, MD, JBF, GDB. Supervision: GDB

Funding

This study was supported by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation and National Institute of Health/National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute (K01HL135392 to Geoffrey D. Barnes). The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Barnes reports grants from Pfizer/Bristol-Myers-Squib, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute during the conduct of the study. Dr. Barnes reports consulting fees from Pfizer/Bristol-Myers-Squib, Janssen, and Portola outside of the submitted work. Dr. Froehlich reports grant support from Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan and the Fibromuscular Disease Society of America. Dr. Froehlich reports consulting fees for Merck, Janssen, and Novartis outside of the submitted work. Dr. Froehlich serves on the Advisory Committee of Boehringer-Ingelheim and Pfizer. Dr. Kaatz reports grants from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Janssen during the conduct of the study. Dr. Kaatz reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Bristol Myer Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Portola, Roche, and Boehringer Ingelheim outside of the submitted work. Ms. Kline-Rogers reports consulting fees from Anticoagulation Forum and Janssen Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work. All other authors have no disclosures.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Given the retrospective nature of this study and the minimal risk that it presented to subjects, this study was granted a waiver of informed consent from our respective Institutional Review Board.

Supplementary material

11239_2019_1883_MOESM1_ESM.docx (27 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 26 kb)
11239_2019_1883_MOESM2_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 25 kb)
11239_2019_1883_MOESM3_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 25 kb)
11239_2019_1883_MOESM4_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 25 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 130:199–267.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000041 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M et al (2015) Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. EP Eur 17:1467–1507Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fanikos J, Burnett AE, Mahan CE, Dobesh PP (2017) Renal function considerations for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med 130:1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Minhas AS, Jiang Q, Gu X et al (2016) Renal function in atrial fibrillation patients switched from warfarin to a direct oral anticoagulant. J Thromb Thrombolysis 42:566–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roldan V, Marin F, Fernandez H et al (2013) Renal impairment in a “real-life” cohort of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (implications for thromboembolism and bleeding). Am J Cardiol 111:1159–1164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Thomas L et al (2016) Off-label dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and adverse outcomes: the ORBIT-AF II Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:2597–2604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gladstone DJ, Geerts WH, Douketis J et al (2015) How to monitor patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a practice tool endorsed by Thrombosis Canada, the Canadian Stroke Consortium, the Canadian Cardiovascular Pharmacists Network, and the Canadian Car. Ann Intern Med 163:382–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conway SE, Hwang AY, Ponte CD, Gums JG (2017) Laboratory and clinical monitoring of direct acting oral anticoagulants: what clinicians need to know. Pharmacother J Hum Pharmacol Drug Ther 37:236–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levin A, Stevens PE, Bilous RW et al (2013) Kidney Disease: improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 3(1):5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Howard M, Lipshutz A, Roess B et al (2017) Identification of risk factors for inappropriate and suboptimal initiation of direct oral anticoagulants. J Thromb Thrombolysis 43:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barnes GD, Kaatz S, Golgotiu V et al (2013) Use of warfarin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following knee and hip arthroplasty: results of the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2). J Thromb Thrombolysis 35:10–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-012-0766-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barnes GD, Kaatz S, Winfield J et al (2014) Warfarin use in atrial fibrillation patients at low risk for stroke: analysis of the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI 2). J Thromb Thrombolysis 37:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lip GYH, Frison L, Halperin JL, Lane DA (2011) Comparative validation of a novel risk score for predicting bleeding risk in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the HAS-BLED (Hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile INR, elderly, drug). J Am Coll Cardiol 57:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cockcroft DW, Gault H (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:883–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV et al (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:981–992.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1107039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361:1139–1151.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0905561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Henault LE, Hylek EM, Phillips KA et al (2003) Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults. JAMA 285:2370.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.18.2370 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fosbol EL, Holmes DN, Piccini JP et al (2013) Provider specialty and atrial fibrillation treatment strategies in United States community practice: findings from the ORBIT-AF registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2:e000110.  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Washam JB, Holmes DN, Thomas LE et al (2018) Pharmacotherapy for atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic kidney disease: insights from ORBIT-AF. J Am Heart Assoc 7:e008928.  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cayuelas JMA, Martínez CC, Blanco PJF et al (2018) Kidney function monitoring and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant dosage in atrial fibrillation. Eur J Clin Invest 48(6):e12907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hernández PR, Miluy GO (2016) Health care in Spain: current status and future directions. J Assoc Vasc Access 21:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin M. Gruca
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yun Li
    • 3
  • Xiaowen Kong
    • 1
  • Deborah DeCamillo
    • 1
  • Eva Kline-Rogers
    • 1
  • Mona A. Ali
    • 4
  • Scott Kaatz
    • 5
  • Musa Dahu
    • 6
  • James B. Froehlich
    • 1
  • Geoffrey D. Barnes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine, Frankel Cardiovascular CenterUniversity of Michigan Medical CenterAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine, McGaw Medical CenterNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biostatistics, School of Public HealthUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Beaumont HospitalRoyal OakUSA
  5. 5.Division of Hospital MedicineHenry Ford HospitalDetroitUSA
  6. 6.Spectrum Health SystemGrand RapidsUSA

Personalised recommendations