Advertisement

Resolving some contradictions in the theory of linear opinion pools

(comments on “Learning from others: conditioning versus averaging” by Richard Bradley)
  • A. Philip DawidEmail author
  • Julia Mortera
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Bradley (Theory Decis 85:5–20, 2018) develops some theory of the linear opinion pool, in apparent contradiction to results of Dawid et al. (Test 4:263–314, 1995). We investigate the sources of these contradictions, and in particular identify a mathematical error in Bradley (2018) that invalidates his main result.

Keywords

Expert testimony Linear opinion pool 

Notes

References

  1. Bradley, R. (2018). Learning from others: conditioning versus averaging. Theory and Decision, 85, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dawid, A. P., DeGroot, M. H., & Mortera, J. (1995). Coherent combination of experts’ opinions (with Discussion). Test, 4, 263–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeGroot, M. H. (1974). Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeGroot, M. H., & Mortera, J. (1991). Optimal linear opinion pools. Management Science, 37, 546–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McConway, K. J. (1981). Marginalization and linear opinion pools. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 410–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stone, M. (1961). The opinion pool. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 1339–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Statistical LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Università Roma TreRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations