Advertisement

Design of interfaces between high speed data converters and high performance FPGAs for software defined radio applications

  • Mahadevan Balakrishnan
  • Khalim Amjad MeerjaEmail author
  • Kishore Kumar Gundugonti
  • Sri Rama Krishna Kalva
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Software defined radio (SDR) is a vast and emerging field that requires the design of various technologies such as antenna, RF, IF, and digital baseband subsystems. Among all these technologies, data converters that convert signals between analog and digital domains are highly crucial. On the other hand field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) based platforms are being preferred for evaluating and implementing the digital communication concepts due to their programmability and reconfigurability. As a result they are well suited for the design of SDR technology. In this research work, we develop a platform where high-speed data converters are interfaced with high performance FPGAs. Interfaces are designed for analog-to-digital convertors (ADC) and digital-to-analog convertors (DAC) to communicate with FPGAs. For the interface design between ADC and FPGA, a double data rate and a low voltage differential signalling based serial output is adopted. And, for the interface design between DAC and other FPGA, parallel complementary metal oxide semiconductor outputs are used. To reconfigure the modes and parameters of the data convertors, serial peripheral interface data controllers have been designed. We have through simulations evaluated the performance of our designed interfaces between data convertors and FPGAs.

Keywords

ADC DAC SDR FPGA LVDS CMOS SFDR 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Alasti, H. (2018). A low complexity and flexible implementation of \(2^{n}\)-QAM for software defined radio applications. In 2018 15th IEEE annual consumer communications networking conference (CCNC) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cai, X., Zhou, M., & Huang, X. (2017). Model-based design for software defined radio on an FPGA. IEEE Access, 5, 8276–8283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cai, X., Zhou, M., & Huang, X. (2017). Model-based design for software defined radio on an FPGA. IEEE Access, 5, 8276–8283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cummings, M., & Haruyama, S. (1999). FPGA in the software radio. IEEE Communications Magazine, 37(2), 108–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Defossez, M. (2006). Connecting Xilinx FPGAs to Texas Instruments ADS527x series ADCs. Application Note: Virtex-II, Virtex-II Pro, and Spartan-3 Families.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Defossez, M. (2008). An interface for Texas instruments analog-to-digital converters with serial LVDS outputs. Application Note: Virtex-4 and Virtex-5 FPGAs.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goeller, L., & Tate, D. (2014). A technical review of software defined radios: Vision, reality, and current status. In 2014 IEEE military communications conference (pp. 1466–1470).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hervás, M., Alsina-Pagès, R. M., & Salvador, M. (2016). An FPGA scalable software defined radio platform design for educational and research purposes. Electronics, 5(2), 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hiari, O., & Mesleh, R. (2017). A reconfigurable SDR transmitter platform architecture for space modulation mimo techniques. IEEE Access, 5, 24214–24228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Interfacing Analog to Digital Converters to FPGAs. White paper (2007).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jondral, F. K. (2005). Software-defined radio sbasics and evolution to cognitive radio. Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 3, 275–283.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Junior, S. B., de Oliveira, V. C., & Junior, G. B. (2015). Software defined radio implementation of a QPSK modulator/demodulator in an extensive hardware platform based on FPGAs Xilinx ZYNQ. Journal of Computer Science, 11(4), 598–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Panda, A. R., Mishra, D., & Ratha, H. K. (2017). FPGA implementation of a tone-based flight termination system in a software-defined radio platform. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(5), 2360–2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salkintzis, A. K., Nie, H., & Mathiopoulos, P. T. (1999). ADC and DSP challenges in the development of software radio base stations. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(4), 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sruthi, M. B., Abirami, M., Manikkoth, A., Gandhiraj, R., & Soman, K. P. (2013). Low cost digital transceiver design for software defined radio using RTL-SDR. In 2013 international mutli-conference on automation, computing, communication, control and compressed sensing (iMac4s) (pp 852–855).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stewart, R. W., Crockett, L., Atkinson, D., Barlee, K., Crawford, D., Chalmers, I., et al. (2015). A low-cost desktop software defined radio design environment using MATLAB, simulink, and the RTL-SDR. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(9), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Texas Instruments: DAC5687-16-BIT, 500 MSPS 2-8 Interpolating dual-channel digital-to-analog converter (DAC). (2006).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Texas Instruments: DAC5687 EVM user guide. (2007).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Texas Instruments: ADS62P43- DUAL CHANNEL, 14-BITS, 125/105/80/65 MSPS ADC with DDR LVDS/CMOS outputs (2009).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vergari, F. (2013). Software-defined radio: Finding its use in public safety. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 8(2), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xilinx Inc.: UG331-Spartan-3 Generation FPGA User Guide; Extended Spartan-3A, Spartan-3E, and Spartan-3 FPGA Families. (2009).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xilinx Inc.: Virtex-5 Libraries Guide for HDL designs. (2009).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, F., Yang, Z., Feng, W., Cui, H., Huang, L., & Hu, W. (2008). A high speed CMOS transmitter and rail-to-rail receiver. In 4th IEEE International Symposium on Electronic Design, Test and Applications, 2008. DELTA 2008 (pp. 67 –70).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.QualcommMarkhamCanada
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and CommunicationsV R Siddhartha Engineering CollegeVijayawadaIndia

Personalised recommendations