pp 1–21 | Cite as

Lying and knowing

  • Ben HolguínEmail author


This paper defends the simple view that in asserting that p, one lies iff one knows that p is false. Along the way it draws some morals about deception, knowledge, Gettier cases, belief, assertion, and the relationship between first- and higher-order norms.


Lying Knowing Belief Assertion Gettier cases 



  1. Benton, M. A. (2011). Two more for the knowledge account of assertion. Analysis, 71(4), 684–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benton, M. A. (2018a). Lying, accuracy and credence. Analysis, 78(2), 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benton, M. A. (2018b). Lying, belief, and knowledge. In J. Meibauer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lying. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buchak, L. (2014). Belief, credence, and norms. Philosophical Studies, 169(2), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cappelen, H. (2011). Against assertion. In J. Brown & H. Cappelen (Eds.), Assertion: New philosophical essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carson, T. L. (2006). The definition of lying. Noûs, 40(2), 284–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carson, T. L. (2010). Lying and deception: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chisholm, R. M., & Feehan, T. D. (1977). The intent to deceive. Journal of Philosophy, 74(3), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, W. A. (1999). Communicating, telling, and informing. Philosophical Inquiry, 21(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeRose, K. (2002). Assertion, knowledge, and context. Philosophical Review, 111(2), 167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorst, K. (2019). Lockeans maximize expected accuracy. Mind, 128, 175–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fallis, D. (2009). What is lying? Journal of Philosophy, 106(1), 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fallis, D. (2010). Lying and deception. Philosophers’ Imprint, 10, 1–22. Google Scholar
  14. Fallis, D. (2013). Davidson was almost right about lying. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 91(2), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fallis, D. (2015). Are bald-faced lies deceptive after all? Ratio, 28(1), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fallis, D., & Stokke, A. (2017). Bullshitting, lying, and indifference toward truth. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 4, 277–309.Google Scholar
  17. Fantl, J., & McGrath, M. (2009). Knowledge in an uncertain world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foley, R. (2009). Beliefs, degrees of belief, and the lockean thesis. In F. Huber & C. Schmidt-Petri (Eds.), Degrees of belief (pp. 37–47). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankfurt, H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hawthorne, J. (2000). Implicit belief and a priori knowledge. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 38(S1), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hawthorne, J., Rothschild, D., & Spectre, L. (2016). Belief is weak. Philosophical Studies, 173(5), 1393–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and belief. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Isenberg, A. (1964). Deontology and the ethics of lying. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 24(4), 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krauss, S. F. (2017). Lying, risk and accuracy. Analysis, 77(4), 726–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kripke, S. A. (2011). Nozick on knowledge. In S. A. Kripke (Ed.), Philosophical troubles. Collected papers (Vol. I). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kupfer, J. (1982). The moral presumption against lying. Review of Metaphysics, 36(1), 103–126.Google Scholar
  28. Lackey, J. (2013). Lies and deception: An unhappy divorce. Analysis, 73(2), 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leitgeb, H. (2013). Reducing belief simpliciter to degrees of belief. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 164(12), 1338–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahon, J. E. (2016). The definition of lying and deception. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.). Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  31. Marsili, N. (2014). Lying as a scalar phenomenon. In S. Cantarini, W. Abraham, & E. Leiss (Eds.), Certainty–uncertainty: And the attitudinal space in between. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Myers-Schulz, B., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). Knowing that P without believing that P. Noûs, 47(2), 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pagin, P. (2016). Assertion. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.). Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  34. Radford, C. (1966). Knowledge—by examples. Analysis, 27(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  35. Rose, D., & Schaffer, J. (2013). Knowledge entails dispositional belief. Philosophical Studies, 166(1), 19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ross, J., & Schroeder, M. (2014). Belief, credence, and pragmatic encroachment1. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(2), 259–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rutschmann, R., & Wiegmann, A. (2017). No need for an intention to deceive? Challenging the traditional definition of lying. Philosophical Psychology, 30(4), 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sorensen, R. (2007). Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 88(2), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sorensen, R. (2010). Knowledge-lies. Analysis, 70(4), 608–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Staffel, J. (2011). Reply to Roy Sorensen, ’knowledge-lies’. Analysis, 71(2), 300–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Staffel, J. (2016). Beliefs, buses and lotteries: Why rational belief can’t be stably high credence. Philosophical Studies, 173(7), 1721–1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stokke, A. (2013a). Lying and asserting. Journal of Philosophy, 110(1), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stokke, A. (2013b). Lying, deceiving, and misleading. Philosophy Compass, 8(4), 348–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stokke, A. (2018). Lying, sincerity, and quality. In J. Meibauer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of lying. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Strichartz, A. F., & Burton, R. V. (1990). Lies and truth: A study of the development of the concept. Child Development, 61(1), 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sturgeon, S. (2008). Reason and the grain of belief. Noûs, 42(1), 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turri, A., & Turri, J. (2015). The truth about lying. Cognition, 138, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turri, A., & Turri, J. (forthcoming). Lying, fast and slow. Synthese, 1–19.Google Scholar
  50. Turri, J. (2011). The express knowledge account of assertion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89(1), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turri, J. (2016a). Knowledge and the norm of assertion: An essay in philosophical science. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turri, J. (2016b). Knowledge judgments in ‘Gettier’ cases. In J. Sytsma & W. Buckwalter (Eds.), A companion to experimental philosophy (pp. 337–348). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Turri, J. (2017). Knowledge attributions in iterated fake barn cases. Analysis, 77, 104–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Unger, P. K. (1975). Ignorance: A case for scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Weiner, M. (2005). Must we know what we say? Philosophical Review, 114(2), 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weiner, M. (2007). Norms of assertion. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wiegmann, A., Samland, J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2016). Lying despite telling the truth. Cognition, 150, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Worsnip, A. (2017). Contextualism and knowledge norms. In J. Ichikawa (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of epistemic contextualism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations