Species are, at the same time, kinds and individuals: a causal argument based on an empirical approach to species identity
- 37 Downloads
After having reconstructed a minimal biological characterisation of species, we endorse an “empirical approach” based on the idea that it is the peculiar evolutionary history of the species at issue—its peculiar origination process, its peculiar metapopulation structure and the peculiar mixture and strength of homeostatic processes vis à vis heterostatic ones—that determines species’ identity at a time and through time. We then explore the consequences of the acceptance of the empirical approach in settling the individuals versus kinds dispute. In particular, while conceptual arguments have been proposed to show that species can be equally treated as individuals and kinds because mereology’s and set-theory’s languages are inter-translatable, we advance instead a causal argument to sustain the claim that each species is both a kind (i.e., a class whose members share some properties included in a cluster) and an individual (i.e., a whole made of parts).
KeywordsBiological species HPC kinds Species-individuals
We thank Ingo Brigandt, Kevin de Queiroz, Matthew Slater, and Achille Varzi for incisive feedback and suggestions. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their stimulating feedback, and the audience at the EPILOG seminar (in particular Cristina Amoretti and Marcello Frixione) of the University of Genoa, Italy, where the ideas proposed in this article starting to take shape. We acknowledge the financial support of the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (BIODECON R&D Project Grant PTDC/IVC-HFC/1817/2014). Davide Vecchi also acknowledges the financial support of the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Grant No. SFRH/BPD/99879/2014; Grant No. UID/FIL/00678/2019).
- Boyd, R. (1999). Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In R. A. Wilson (Ed.), Species. New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 141–186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- de Queiroz, K. (1999). The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In R. A. Wilson (Ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 49–89). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dupré, J. (1995). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman Cooper.Google Scholar
- Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23, 436–444.Google Scholar
- Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hull, D. L. (1992). Individual. In E. Fox Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology (pp. 181–187). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- LaPorte, J. (2004). Natural kinds and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Levins, R. (1970). Extinction. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences, 2, 75–77.Google Scholar
- Mayr, E. (1970). Populations, species, and evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Mayr, E. (2001). What evolution is. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Ridley, M. (2004). Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Stamos, D. (2003). The species problem. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Templeton, A. R. (1989). The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective. In D. Otte & J. A. Endler (Eds.), Speciation and its consequences (pp. 3–27). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Varzi, A. (2016). Mereology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/mereology/. Accessed April 2018.
- West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilkins, J. S. (2009). Defining species. A sourcebook from antiquity to today. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97–159.Google Scholar