Life and life only: a radical alternative to life definitionism
To date, no definition of life has been unequivocally accepted by the scientific community. In frustration, some authors advocate alternatives to standard definitions. These include using a list of characteristic features, focusing on life’s effects, or categorizing biospheres rather than life itself; treating life as a fuzzy category, a process or a cluster of contingent properties; or advocating a ‘wait-and-see’ approach until other examples of life are created or discovered. But these skeptical, operational, and pluralistic approaches have intensified the debate, rather than settled it. Given the failure of even these approaches, we advocate a new strategy. In this paper, we reverse the usual line of reasoning and argue that the “life problem” arises from thinking incorrectly about the nature of life. Scientists most often conceptualize life as a class or kind, with earthly life as a single instance of it. Instead, we advocate thinking about Earth’s Life (with a capital ‘L’) as an individual, in the way that species are now thought to be. In this view, Life is a monophyletic clade that originated with a last universal common ancestor, and includes all its descendants. We can continue to use the category ‘life’ (lower case ‘l’) pragmatically to refer to similarities between various phenomena and Life. But the relevant similarities are a matter of interest and preference, not a matter of fact. The search for other life in the Universe, then, is merely a search for entities that resemble parts of Life in whatever sense astrobiologists find most appealing (e.g. metabolism, evolution, information, etc.). This does not mean that the search for evolved complexity elsewhere in the universe or its creation in the lab are futile endeavors, but that debates over whether they count as ‘life’ are. Ironically, finally abandoning the concept ‘life’ may make our searches for evolved complexity more fruitful. We explain why.
KeywordsLife Definitions of life LUCA Philosophy of astrobiology Origin of life Theory of life
We thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant No. GLDSU/447989) for support, as well as the audiences in POBAM 2016, Duke University, University of Washington, Bryn Mawr College, University of Nevada, Reno, Dalhousie University, SoCIA 2018, Austin Booth, Letitia Meynell, Tyler D.P. Brunet, the editors, and several anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that helped improve this paper.
- Boyd, R. (1999). Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In R. Wilson (Ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 141–185). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Cleland, C. E. (2004). Why it is a mistake to define ‘life’. In M. Bedau, P. Husbands, et al. (Eds.), Artificial life IX workshop proceedings (pp. 93–95).Google Scholar
- Cleland, C. E. (2006). Understanding the nature of life: A matter of definition or theory. In J. Seckbach (Ed.), Life as we know it. (Vol. 10 of the cellular origins, life in extreme habitats and astrobiology series) (pp. 589–600). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. C. (1997). Facing backwards on the problem of consciousness. In J. Shear (Ed.), Explaining consciousness: The hard problem. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. C. (2016). Illusionism as the obvious default theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(11–12), 65–72.Google Scholar
- Descartes, R. (2010). Treatise on man. In M. A. Bedau & C. E. Cleland (Eds.), The nature of life: Classical and contemporary perspectives from philosophy and science. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 15-20. 9-14. (Original translation published in 1985 by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch, Cambridge University Press. Original work published in 1664).Google Scholar
- Ellington, A. D. (2012). Origins for everyone. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(3), 361–366.Google Scholar
- Ereshefsky, M. (Ed.). (1992a). The units of evolution: essays on the nature of species. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Feinberg, G., & Shapiro, R. (1980). Life beyond earth: the intelligent earthling’s guide to life in the universe. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
- Hull, D. L. (1976). Are species really individuals? Systematic Biology, 25(2), 174–191.Google Scholar
- Jabr, F. (2013). Why life does not really exist. Scientific American. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/brainwaves/2013/12/02/why-life-does-not-really-exist/. Accessed May 29, 2014.
- Küppers, B. O. (1990). Information and the origin of life. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lahav, N. (1999). Biogenesis: Theories of life’s origin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Langton, C. G. (1989). Artificial life. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Lederberg, J. (1960). Exobiology: approaches to life beyond the earth. Science, 132(3424), 393–400, article stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1705846.
- Levin, G. V. (2010). It’s time to realize there is life on mars. EARTH, 86.Google Scholar
- Mayr, E. (1998). This is biology: The science of the living world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Mix, L. J. (2016). Five lives. In Canadian society for the history and philosophy of science annual conference/Congrès Annuel de la Société Canadienne d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences. Presentation.Google Scholar
- Müller, H.J. (1926). The gene as the basis of life. In Proceedings of the 1st international congress of plant sciences, Ithaca, pp. 897–921.Google Scholar
- Oparin, A. (2010). The nature of life. (Original translation published in 1964 by Ann Synge, Charlotte Synge and Liz Smith, Academic Press, and Oliver and Boyd Ltd., Longman Publishing. Original work published in 1936).Google Scholar
- Pályi, G., Zucchi, C., & Caglioti, L. (Eds.). (2002). Fundamentals of life. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Plaxco, K. W., & Gross, M. (2006). Astrobiology: A brief introduction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Popa, R. (2004). Between necessity and probability: Searching for the definition and origin of life. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Sagan, C. (1970). Life. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Chicago, Ill.: Encyclopædia Britannica Incorporated, pp. 1083–1083A.Google Scholar
- Sagan, C. (1974). The origin of life in a cosmic context. Cosmochemical evolution and the origins of life (Vol. 5, pp. 497–505). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is life?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Shields, C. (2015). De Anima, Translated with an introduction and commentary, Clarendon Aristotle Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, C. T. (2011). Vitalism. In M. Gargaud, et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of astrobiology (pp. 1740–1750). New York: Springer.Google Scholar