Infinitesimal idealization, easy road nominalism, and fractional quantum statistics
- 115 Downloads
It has been recently debated whether there exists a so-called “easy road” to nominalism. In this essay, I attempt to fill a lacuna in the debate by making a connection with the literature on infinite and infinitesimal idealization in science through an example from mathematical physics that has been largely ignored by philosophers. Specifically, by appealing to John Norton’s distinction between idealization and approximation, I argue that the phenomena of fractional quantum statistics bears negatively on Mary Leng’s proposed path to easy road nominalism, thereby partially defending Mark Colyvan’s claim that there is no easy road to nominalism.
KeywordsIdealization Approximation Easy road nominalism Mathematical explanation Indispensability argument Anyons Fractional quantum statistics
I gratefully acknowledge useful discussions with Mary Leng and Mark Colyvan. Previous versions of this paper were presented at the “Annual Meeting of the European Philosophy of Science Association” at Exeter University on 09/09/2017 and “Current Projects” at Department of Philosophy at University of Sydney on 08/03/2017. I thank the participants for helpful comments. This work was produced as part of a visiting fellowship at the Sydney Centre for the Foundations of Science and Ideas and the Sydney Centre for Time at University of Sydney.
- Bain, J. (2016). Emergence and mechanism in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 56, 27–38.Google Scholar
- Balaguer, M. (1998). Platonism and anti-platonism in mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Batterman, R. (2002). The devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Colyvan, M. (2007). Mathematical recreation versus mathematical knowledge. In M. Leng, A. Paseau, & M. D. Potter (Eds.) (pp. 109–22).Google Scholar
- Earman, J. (2010). Understanding permutation invariance in quantum mechanics. (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
- Earman, J. (2017). The role of idealizations in the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Synthese,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1522-9.
- Field, H. H. (1980). Science without numbers: A defense of nominalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Frigg, R. (2006). Scientific representation and the semantic view of theories. Theoria, 55(2006), 49–65.Google Scholar
- Guay, A., Sartenaer, O. (2016b). Emergent quasiparticles. Or how to get a rich physics from a sober metaphysics. In O. Bueno, R. Chen, & M. B. Fagan (Eds.), Individuation across experimental and theoretical sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/179059
- Hatcher, A. (2002). Algebraic topology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–75. Repr. in Hempel, C. (Ed.), Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press (1965) (pp. 245–90).Google Scholar
- Hughes, R. I. G. (1989). Bell’s theorem, ideology, and structural explanation. In J. T. Cushing & E. McMullin (Eds.), Philosophical consequences of quantum theory: Reections on Bell’s theorem (pp. 195–207). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
- Khare, A. (2005). Fractional statistics and quantum theory. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.Google Scholar
- Klitzing, K. v., Dorda, G., & Pepper, M., (1980). New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized hall resistance. Physical Review Letters, 45, 494–497.Google Scholar
- Leng, M. (2005). Mathematical explanation. In C. Cellucci & D. Gillies (Eds.), Mathematical reasoning and heuristics. London: King’s College Publications.Google Scholar
- Maddy, P. (1997). Naturalism in mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Menon, T., & Callender, C. (2013). Turn and face the strange... Ch-Ch-changes: Philosophical questions raised by phase transitions. In R. W. Batterman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Messiah, A. M. (1962). Quantum mechanics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Nounou, A. (2003). A fourth way to the Aharonov-Bohm effect. In K. Bradind & E. Castellani (Eds.), Symmetries in physics: Philosophical replections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Peshkin, M., & Tonomura, A. (1989). The Aharonov–Bohm effect. LNP (Vol. 340). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Putnam, H. (1971). Philosophy of logic. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Quine, W. V. O. (1981). Theories and things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Railton, P. (1980). Explaining explanation: A realist account of scientific explanation and understanding. Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
- Rao, S. (2001). An anyon rimer. arXiv:hep-th/9209066.
- Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Shech, E. (2017). Idealizations, essential self-adjointness, and minimal model explanation in the Aharonov–Bohm effect. Synthese, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1428-6.
- Tsui, D. C., Stormer, H. L., & Gossard, A. C. (1982). Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit. Physical Review Letters, 48(22), 1559.Google Scholar
- von Klitzing, K. (2004). 25 Years of quantum Hall effect (QHE): A personal view on the discovery, physica and application of this quantum effect. In B. Douçot, V. Pasquier, B. Duplantier, & V. Rivasseau (Eds.), The quantum Hall effect Poincaré seminar (pp. 1–23). Berlin: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
- Wilczek, F. (Ed.). (1990). Fractional statistics and anyon superconductivity. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
- Woodward, J. F. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar