The word of a reluctant convert
- 54 Downloads
Recent political events suggest that there is more political, religious, and moral division than many had previously realized. Since people on all sides think they’re in the right, mitigating division is in everyone’s interest. But overcoming division requires changing minds, and changing minds requires advocacy. These considerations raise important questions in the epistemology of advocacy. In particular, who are the best advocates? After making some general remarks about the epistemology of advocacy, I explore the thought, found in Berkeley’s dialogue Alciphron, that an important variable to consider when assessing advocates is whether they are converts. I argue that this is indeed an important variable to consider, as certain kinds of converts can avoid some attempts to dismiss advocates. However, non-converts score better than converts in other respects. I conclude by suggesting that empirical work must be done to assess the role conversion plays in assessing advocates.
KeywordsAdvocacy Conversion Social epistemology Authority Trust Bias Resistance
Thanks to Jon Herington and Robert Simpson for helpful discussion and to several anonymous referees for comments that helped improve the paper. Thanks also to Katia Vavova, Pete Graham, Luis Pinto de Sa, John Schwenkler, Daniel Fogal, Rosa Terlazzo, Lisa Cassell, and Mike Titelbaum.
- Alexander, M. (2010). The new jim crow. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, J. (1963). The fire next time. New York City: Dial Press.Google Scholar
- Berkeley, G. (1732). Alciphron, or the minute philosopher. Books.google.com Accessed Aug 4, 2017.
- Cialdini, R. (1984). Influence. New York City: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
- DiPaolo, J. (MS) Epistemic self-licensing.Google Scholar
- Douthat, R. (2007). The zeal of a convert. In The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/personal/archive/2007/10/the-zeal-of-a-convert/54986/ Accessed April 6, 2018.
- Downing, D. (2002). The most reluctant convert. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A., Chaiken, S., & Wood, W. (1981). An attribution analysis of persuasion. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New direction in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 37–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Goldman, A. (2010). Systems-oriented social epistemology. In Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 4).Google Scholar
- Jamieson, K., & Capella, J. (2008). Echo chambers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis, C. S. (1955/2012). Surprised by joy: The shape of my early life. New York: First Mariner Books.Google Scholar
- Lewis, C. S. (1963). The seeing eye. In The timeless writings of C. S. Lewis (pp. 290–296). New York: Inspirational Press.Google Scholar
- Pascal, B. (1670/1958). Pensees. New York: E. Dutton & Co., Inc.Google Scholar
- Petty, R., Tormala, Z., & Rucker, D. (2004). Resisting persuasion by counterarguing: An attitude strength perspective. In J. Jost, M. Banaji, & D. Prentice (Eds.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress (pp. 37–51). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Petty, R., Wheeler, S., & Tormala, Z. (2003). Persuasion and attitude change. In I. B. Weiner, H. A. Tennen, & J. M. Suls (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (pp. 353–382). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Russell, B. (1945). A history of western philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Saul, J. (2003). Feminism: Issues and arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Somin, I. (2013). Democracy and political ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tormala, Z. (2008). A new framework for resistance to persuasion: The resistance appraisals hypothesis. In W. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 213–234). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar