Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 196, Issue 3, pp 775–793 | Cite as

The nature of science. A dialogue

  • C. MantzavinosEmail author
S.I.: Systematicity - The Nature of Science

Abstract

In this dialogue the view of Paul Hoyningen-Huene as defended in Systematicity. The Nature of Science is presented and criticized. The approach is developed dialectically by the two interlocutors, a series of critical points are debated and an alternative view is introduced. The dialogical form is intended to honor the general philosophical approach of the author summarized in the last sentence of the book, where he states that he sees philosophy as an ongoing, open-ended dialogue.

Keywords

Science General philosophy of science Criticism Institutions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Theodore Arabatzis, Karim Bschir, Hasok Chang, Katerina Ierodiakonou, Simon Lohse and two anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Albert, H. (1968/1985). Treatise on critical reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, W. W. R. (1919). A short account of the history of mathematics. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited.Google Scholar
  3. Bernholz, P., Streit, M. E., & Vaubel, R. (1998). Political competition, innovation and growth. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrier, M., & Nordmann, A. (Eds.). (2011). Science in the context of application. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, H. (2012). Is water H \({_2}\) O?, Evidence, realism and pluralism. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, C. (1859/1964). On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. A facsimile of the first edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Einstein, A. (1936/1982). Physics and reality. In C. Selig (Ed.), Ideas and opinions, New York: Three Rivers Press, pp. 290–323.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, M. (2001). Dynamics of reason. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, M. (2002). Kant, Kuhn, and the rationality of science. Philosophy of Science, 69, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howell, M. C., & Prevenier, W. (2001). From reliable sources: An introduction to historical methods. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (2006). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (3rd ed.). Chicago: Open Court Publishing House.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, E. L. (2003). The European miracle (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a democratic society. New York: Prometheus Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Longino, H. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Longino, H. (2013). Studying human behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neurath, O. (1932/1933). Protokollsätze. Erkenntnis, 3(1), 204–214.Google Scholar
  20. Newton, I. (1730/1952). Opticks; or a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections & colours of light Based on the 4th edition. London/New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  21. Plato (1995). Theaetetus. Oxford classical texts: Platonis Opera (Vol. I). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Popper, KR. (1963/1989). Conjectures and refutations (5th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Sextus Empiricus (1933). Outlines of pyrrhonism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univesity Press.Google Scholar
  24. von Goethe, JW. (1802). Natur und Kunst. In Was wir bringen. Vorspiel, bey Eröffnung des neuen Schauspielhauses zu Lauchstädt. Tübingen: J.G. Cotta’schen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  25. Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1958). Philosophische Untersuchungen (Philosophical investigations) (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and History of ScienceUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations