Advertisement

Exploiting the concept level feature for enhanced name entity recognition in Chinese EMRs

  • Qing ZhaoEmail author
  • Dan Wang
  • Jianqiang Li
  • Faheem Akhtar
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The accumulation and explosive growth of the electronic medical records (EMRs) make the name entity recognition (NER) technologies become critical for the meaningful use of EMR data and then the practice of evidence-based medicine. The dominate NER approaches use the distributed representation of the words and characters to build deep learning-based NER models. However, for the task of biomedical named entity recognition, there are a large amount of complicated medical terminologies that are composed of multiple words. Splitting these terminologies to learn the word and character embeddings might cause semantic ambiguities. In this paper, we treat each medical terminology as a concept and propose a concept-enhanced named entity recognition model (CNER), where the features from three different granularities (i.e., concept, word, and character) are combined together for bio-NER. The extensive experiments are conducted on two real-world corpora: fully labeled corpus and partially labeled corpus. CNER achieves the highest F1 score (fully labeled corpus: precision = 88.23, recall = 88.29, and F1 = 88.26; partially labeled corpus: precision = 87.03, recall = 88.19, and F1 = 87.61) by outperforming the baseline CW-BLSTM-CRF approach for 0.58% and 1.15% respectively, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Keywords

Named entity recognition (NER) Concept feature Deep neural network (DNN) Semantic information analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the Xinjiang Nature Science Foundation of China (2019D01A23).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Li J, Liu C, Liu B, Mao R, Chen S, Pan H, Wang Q (2015) Diversity-aware retrieval of medical records. Comput Ind 69(1):30–39Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang L, Zhou Y (2014) Exploring feature sets for two-phase biomedical named entity recognition using semi-CRFs. Knowl Inf Syst 40(2):439–453Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chowdhury S, Dong X, Qian L (2018) A multitask bi-directional RNN model for named entity recognition on Chinese electronic medical records. BMC Bioinform 19(17):499–513Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yonghui W, Jiang M, Lei J (2015) Named entity recognition in Chinese clinical text using deep neural network. Stud Health Technol Inf 22(8):321–342Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li J, Zhao Y, Liu B (2012) Exploiting semantic resources for large scale text categorization. J Intell Inf Syst 39(3):763–788Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seifollahi S, Shajari M (2019) Word sense disambiguation application in sentiment analysis of news headlines: an applied approach to FOREX market prediction. J Intell Inf Syst 52(1):57–83Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen DQ, Verspoor K (2019) From POS tagging to dependency parsing for biomedical event extraction. BMC Bioinform 20(2):78–101Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pandey AC, Rajpoot DS, Saraswat M (2017) Twitter sentiment analysis using hybrid cuckoo search method. Inf Process Manag 12(3):565–576Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang Z, Chen W, Wang F, Xu B (2019) Effectively training neural machine translation models with monolingual data. Neurocomputing 333:240–247Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu H, Li J, Kang Y, Zhong T (2018) Exploring noise control strategies for UMLS-based query expansion in health and biomedical information retrieval. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0836-x Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao Q, Kang YY, Li JQ, Wang D (2018) Exploiting the semantic graph for the representation and retrieval of medical documents. Comput Biol Med 101:39–50Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lample G, Ballesteros M et al (2016) Neural architectures for named entity recognition. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, pp 260–270Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marrero M, Urbano J, Sánchez-Cuadrado S, Morato J, Gómez-Berbís M (2013) Named entity recognition: fallacies, challenges and opportunities. Comput Stand Interfaces 35(5):482–489Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang S, Elhadad N (2013) Unsupervised biomedical named entity recognition: experiments with clinical and biological texts. J Biomed Inform 46(6):1088–1098Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen X, Xu L, Liu Z, Sun M, Luan H (2015) Joint learning of character and word embeddings. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp 1236–1242Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chiu JPC, Nichols E (2016) Named entity recognition with bidirectional LSTM-CNNs. Comput Sci 24(8):261–273Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anthony P, Alfred R, Leong LC (2013) A rule-based named-entity recognition for malay articles. In: International Conference on Advanced DataGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zaghouani W (2012) RENAR: a rule-based arabic named entity recognition system. In: ACM Transactions on Asian Language InformationGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leong ASC, Dey S, Evans JS (2007) Probability of error analysis for hidden Markov model filtering with random packet loss. IEEE Trans Signal Process 55(3):218–231MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xiao J, Wang X, Liu B (2001) The study of a nonstationary maximum entropy Markov model and its application on the pos-tagging task. ACM Trans Asian Lang Inf 32(5):334–345Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Furey TS, Cristianini N, Duffy N (2000) Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data. Bioinformatics 12(9):189–202Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zheng S, Jayasumana S, Romera-Paredes B, Vineet V et al (2015) Conditional random fields as recurrent neural networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), vol 32(6), pp 206–015Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li C, Song R, Liakata M, Vlachos A, Seneff S, Zhang X (2015) Using word embedding for bioevent extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing (BioNLP 2015). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, pp 121–126Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lei J, Tang B, Lu X, Gao K, JiangM X (2013) A comprehensive study of named entity recognition in Chinese clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21(5):808–814Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gu J, Wang Z, Kuen J et al (2015) Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Comput Sci 41(12):321–324Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shen Y, Wang J (2008) An improved algebraic criterion for global exponential stability of recurrent neural networks with time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 37(9):523–535Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yao C, Qu Y, Jin B, Guo L, Li C, Cui W, Feng L (2016) A convolutional neural network model for online medical guidance. IEEE Access 4:4094–4103Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sahu SK, Anand A (2016) Recurrent neural network models for disease name recognition using domain invariant features. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.09371
  29. 29.
    Wu Y, JiangM LJ, Xu H (2015) Named entity recognition in chinese clinical text using deep neural network. Stud Health Technol Inform 216:624Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chiu JP, Nichols E (2015) Named entity recognition with bidirectional LSTM-CNNS. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.08308
  31. 31.
    Lei J, Tang B, Lu X, Gao K, JiangM X (2013) A comprehensive study of named entity recognition in chinese clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21(5):808–814Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang X, Li J, Tan Z, Ma L, Li F, Huang M (2016) The state of the art and future tendency of “Internet+” oriented network technology. J Comput Res Dev 53(4):729–741Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dong X, Qian L, Guan Y, Huang L, Yu Q, Yang J (2016) A multiclass classification method based on deep learning for named entity recognition in electronic medical records. In: Scientific Data Summit (NYSDS), IEEE, New York, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang P, Qian Y, Soong FK He L, Zhao H (2015) A unified tagging solution: bidirectional LSTM recurrent neural network with word embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.00215
  35. 35.
    Zhao Z, Yang Z, Luo L, Zhang Y, Wang L, Lin H, Wang J (2016) ML-CNN: a novel deep learning based disease named entity recognition architecture. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp 794–794Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15(1):192–200MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Forney GD Jr (1973) The Viterbi algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol 4, pp 413–426Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Han X, Ruonan R (2011) The method of medical named entity recognition based on semantic model and improved SVM–KNN algorithm. In: Seventh International Conference on Semantics Knowledge and Grid, vol 12, pp 146–155Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li J, Liu C (2012) A cooperative co-learning approach for concept detection in documents. In: IEEE Sixth International Conference on Semantic Computing, 25 Oct 2012Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fridsma D (2012) Electronic health records: the HHS perspective. Computer 45(11):24–26.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.371 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qing Zhao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dan Wang
    • 1
  • Jianqiang Li
    • 1
  • Faheem Akhtar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Information TechnologyBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceSukkur IBA UniversitySukkurPakistan

Personalised recommendations