Advertisement

The theoretical study of dehydrogenation mechanism from Sr(NH2BH3)2

  • Nai-xia Lv
  • Jing-cong Tao
  • Hong-ping LiEmail author
Original Research
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

A first-principle study of dehydrogenation mechanism from Sr(NH2BH3)2 was performed. Three different pathways were explored for Sr(NH2BH3)2 monomer, and the most favorable dehydrogenation pathway involved the formation of the Sr-H group firstly, and then becoming the key hydride source for the consecutive H2 evolution. The intrinsic activation free energy barriers were 29.2, 30.7, 42.7, and 42.4 kcal/mol for four equivalent of H2 release at 298.15 K, which were slightly decreased by 0.3~2 kcal/mol at experimental temperature 333 and 366 K. For Sr(NH2BH3)2 dimer, the estimated intrinsic free energy barriers are 22.7, 30.4, 40.1, and 45.4 kcal/mol for four equivalent of H2 release, respectively. Although it seemed that the energy barriers for the second equivalent of H2 were still higher, considering the energy gain in the formation of dimer, − 18.1 kcal/mol, the first two equivalents of H2 release easily took place at experiment temperature. Thus, our calculations indicated that the most favorable dehydrogenation mechanism involved the strongly basic H from Sr-H acting as a hydride source to accelerate the H2 release, and the effect of neighboring molecules in the solid phase should not be neglected. These results will shed some light on the design of the future hydrogen storage media.

Keywords

Strontium amidoborane Dehydrogenation Density functional theory Hydrogen storage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research work is supported by the high performance computing platform of Jiangsu University.

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Xingyi Normal University for Nationalities (No. 18XYBS01), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21808092), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M651742).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11224_2019_1406_MOESM1_ESM.doc (741 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 741 kb).

References

  1. 1.
    Akbayrak S, Ozkar S (2018) Ammonia borane as hydrogen storage materials. Int J Hydrogen Energ 43:18592–18606Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rossin A, Peruzzini M (2016) Ammonia-borane and amine-borane dehydrogenation mediated by complex metal hydrides. Chem Rev 116:8848–8872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stephens FH, Pons V, Tom Baker R (2007) Ammonia-borane: the hydrogen source par excellence. Dalton Trans (25):2613–2626Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu H, Zhou W, Yildirim T (2008) Alkali and alkaline-earth metal amidoboranes: structure, crystal chemistry, and hydrogen storage properties. J Am Chem Soc 130:14834–14839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang Q, Tang C, Fang C, Fang F, Sun D, Ouyang L et al (2010) Synthesis, crystal structure, and thermal decomposition of strontium amidoborane. J Phys Chem C 114:1709–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chua YS, Li W, Wu G, Xiong Z, Chen P (2012) From exothermic to endothermic dehydrogenation - interaction of monoammoniate of magnesium amidoborane and metal hydrides. Chem Mater 24:3574–3781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chua YS, Wu G, Xiong Z, He T, Chen P (2009) Calcium amidoborane ammoniate-synthesis, structure, and hydrogen storage properties. Chem Mater 21:4899–4904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chua YS, Wu H, Zhou W, Udovic TJ, Wu G, Xiong Z et al (2012) Monoammoniate of calcium amidoborane: synthesis, structure, and hydrogen-storage properties. Inorg Chem 51:1599–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fijałkowski KJ, Grochala W (2009) Substantial emission of NH3 during thermal decomposition of sodium amidoborane, NaNH2BH3. J Mater Chem 19:2043–2050Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kondrat’ev YV, Butlak AV, Kazakov IV, Krasnova IS, Chislov MV, Timoshkin AY (2018) Heat effects of the thermal decomposition of amidoboranes of potassium, calcium, and strontium. Russ J Phys Chem A 92:640–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shimoda K, Doi K, Nakagawa T, Zhang Y, Miyaoka H, Ichikawa T et al (2012) Comparative study of structural changes in NH3BH3, LiNH2BH3, and KNH2BH3 during dehydrogenation process. J Phys Chem C 116:5957–5964Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xiong Z, Yong CK, Wu G, Chen P, Shaw W, Karkamkar A et al (2008) High-capacity hydrogen storage in lithium and sodium amidoboranes. Nat Mater 7:138–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spielmann J, Jansen G, Bandmann H, Harder S (2008) Calcium amidoborane hydrogen storage materials: crystal structures of decomposition products. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 47:6290–6295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhattacharya S, Xiong Z, Wu G, Chen P, Feng YP, Majumder C et al (2012) Dehydrogenation mechanism of monoammoniated lithium amidoborane [Li(NH3)NH2BH3]. J Phys Chem C 116:8859–8864Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim DY, Singh NJ, Lee HM, Kim KS (2009) Hydrogen-release mechanisms in lithium amidoboranes. Chem Eur J 15:5598–5604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee TB, McKee ML (2009) Mechanistic study of LiNH2BH3 formation from (LiH)4+ NH3BH3 and subsequent dehydrogenation. Inorg Chem 48:7564–7575Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lisovenko AS, Timoshkin AY (2017) Formation and unimolecular dehydrogenation of gaseous alkaline-earth metal amidoboranesM(NH2BH3)2(M= Be - Ba): comparative computational study. Z Anorg Allg Chem 643:209–213Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muhammad R, Fredrik S, Sébastien L, Rajeev A (2011) Electronic structure from first-principles of LiBH4·NH3, Sr(NH2BH3)2, and Li2Al(BH4)5·6NH3 for hydrogen storage applications. J Phys Chem C 115:20036–20042Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tao J, Lv N, Wen L, Qi Y, Lv X (2015) Hydrogen-release mechanisms in LiNH2BH3·NH3BH3: a theoretical study. J Mol Struct 1081:437–442Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yuan PF, Wang F, Sun Q, Jia Y, Guo ZX (2013) Dehydrogenation mechanisms of ca(NH2BH3)2: the less the charge transfer, the lower the barrier. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:11313–11320Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuan PF, Sun Q, Jia Y, Guo ZX (2014) Role of charge transfer in dehydrogenation of M(NH2BH3)2 (M = Mg, Sr). J Phys Chem C 118:18315–18324Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang Y, Autrey T, Wolverton C (2012) First-principles prediction of intermediate products in the decomposition of metal amidoboranes. J Phys Chem C 116:26728–26734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guo Y, Xia G, Zhu Y, Gao L, Yu X (2010) Hydrogen release from amminelithium borohydride, LiBH4 . NH3. Chem Commun (Camb) 46:2599–2601Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kang X, Fang Z, Kong L, Cheng H, Yao X, Lu G et al (2008) Ammonia borane destabilized by lithium hydride: an advanced on-board hydrogen storage material. Adv Mater 20:2756–2759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang Y, Wolverton C (2012) Crystal structures, phase stabilities, and hydrogen storage properties of metal amidoboranes. J Phys Chem C 116:14224–14231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Jr TVM, JA KKN, Burant JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi VBJ, Mennucci B, Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida TNM, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox JE, Hratchian HP, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R et al (2004) Gaussian03, Revision B. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee C, Wang Y, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 37:785–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li HP, Zhu SW, Xia JX, Chang YH, Jiang W, Zhang M, Zhou YW, Li HM (2016) The selectivity for sulfur removal from oils: an insight from conceptual density functional theory. AICHE J 62:2087–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hehre WJ, Pople JA (1972) Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XII. Further extensions of Gaussian-type basis sets for use in molecular orbital studies of organic molecules. J Chem Phys 56:2257–2261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Klooster WT, Koetzle TF, Siegbahn PEM, Richardson TB, Crabtree RH (1999) Study of the N-H…H-B dihydrogen bond including the crystal structure of BH3NH3 by neutron diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 121:6337–6343Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lisovenko AS, Timoshkin AY (2016) Comparative computational studies of gaseous alkali metal amidoboranes MNH2BH3 and their carbon analogs MC2H5(M=Li-Cs): formation and unimolecular hydrogen evolution. Z Anorg Allg Chem 642:163–168Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luo J, Kang X, Wang P (2013) Synthesis, formation mechanism, and dehydrogenation properties of the long-sought Mg(NH2BH3)2 compound. Energy Environ Sci 6:1018–1025Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Biology and ChemistryXingyi Normal University For NationalitiesXingyiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Information EngineeringLaiwu Vocational and Technical CollegeLaiwuPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Institute for Energy ResearchJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations