Mechanistic insights into the inhibition mechanism of cysteine cathepsins by chalcone-based inhibitors—a QM cluster model approach
- 52 Downloads
Cathepsins are the most abundant cysteine proteases involved in many physiological processes. The imbalance between the natural cysteine protease inhibitors and cathepsins leads to many pathological conditions such as cancer, osteoporosis, and osteoarthritis. Thus, cysteine cathepsins have turn out to be an attractive therapeutic target for the development of new inhibitors. In this paper, the computational study of the inhibition mechanism of cysteine protease by chalcone-based inhibitors has been carried out by means of quantum chemical calculations by employing DFT method. The present study exposes how the processes of activation of the reactive centers of the chalcone derivatives and the nucleophilic attack by the cysteine residue at the electrophilic reactive site of the chalcone take place in the catalytic active site. The obtained results reveal that the inhibition reaction proceeds in a stepwise manner and the attack of the cysteine residue will be either at carbonyl carbon C32 (pathway 1) or β-carbon C33 (pathway 2). The low positive activation (5.61 and 4.58 kcal/mol) and reaction (1.60 and 9.70 kcal/mol) energies corresponding to both the pathways along with the positive ∇2ρ(r) values for C32/33–S6 bonds imply that the overall reaction is endothermic and the nature of inhibitor is reversible covalent.
KeywordsCysteine protease Catalytic dyad Inhibition mechanism QM cluster DFT Chalcone
The authors (C. Pitchumani Violet Mary and S.Vijayakumar) thank the Department of Science and Technology–Science and Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB), India, for awarding this research project under the OYS Scheme (Grant. No. SR/FTP/PS-115/2011 dated 19/09/2013).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 7.Abrahamson M, Barrett AJ, Salvesen G, Grubb A (1986) Isolation of six cysteine proteinase inhibitors from human urine. Their physicochemical and enzyme kinetic properties and concentrations in biological fluids. J Biol Chem 261:11282–11289Google Scholar
- 41.Srinivasan B, Johnson TE, Lad R, Xing C (2009) Structure-activity relationship studies of chalcone leading to 3-hydroxy-4,3′,4′,5′-tetramethoxychalcone and its analogues as potent nuclear factor κB inhibitors and their anticancer activities. J Med Chem 52:7228–7235. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm901278z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Dinkova-Kostova AT, Abeygunawardana C, Talalay P (1998) Chemoprotective properties of phenylpropenoids, bis(benzylidene)cycloalkanones, and related Michael reaction acceptors: correlation of potencies as phase 2 enzyme inducers and radical scavengers. J Med Chem 41:5287–5296. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm980424s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Gan F-F, Kaminska KK, Yang H et al (2013) Identification of Michael acceptor-centric pharmacophores with substituents that yield strong thioredoxin reductase inhibitory character correlated to antiproliferative activity. Antioxid Redox Signal 19:1149–1165. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.4909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Dinkova-Kostova AT, Massiah MA, Bozak RE et al (2001) Potency of Michael reaction acceptors as inducers of enzymes that protect against carcinogenesis depends on their reactivity with sulfhydryl groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:3404–3409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.051632198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Burns LA, Vázquez-Mayagoitia Á, Sumpter BG, Sherrill CD (2011) Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: a comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals. J Chem Phys 134:084107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3545971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Popelier PLA (1998) MORPHY98 a program written by PLA Popelier with a contribution from RGA Bone. UMIST, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
- 54.Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Pérez P (2016) Applications of the conceptual density functional theory indices to organic chemistry reactivity. Molecules 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21060748
- 55.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Peralta Jr JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi Pomelli RC, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.1. Gaussian, Inc, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
- 59.Janiak C (2000) A critical account on π-π stacking in metal complexes with aromatic nitrogen-containing ligands. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 3885–3896. https://doi.org/10.1039/b003010o