Advertisement

Theoretical insight to the complexation of some transition metals with cryptand

  • Nasibeh Dehghani
  • Bahram Ghalami-ChoobarEmail author
  • Masoud ArabiehEmail author
  • Hamid Dezhampanah
Original Research

Abstract

The most practicable complexes formed between Cryptand[2.2.2] and hydrated Mn(II), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) cations (denoted as [ML]+2) were modeled using computational chemistry methods. The energies of complexation reactions were calculated in both gas phase and solution at B3LYP/6-31+G(d) and B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,2pd) levels of theory. The accuracy of selected computational methods was confirmed with comparison between available X-ray data and computational results. The results suggested that [CuL]+2 and [CoL]+2 structures could be the most and the least stable systems, respectively. The nature of metal-ligand interactions based on quantum theory of atoms in molecule (QTAIM) was discussed for all the complexes. This analysis confirmed the ionic nature of metal-ligand interactions due to electron density values for M-O bonds and M-N interactions. Natural bond orbital (NBO) and natural energy decomposition analysis (NEDA) were utilized to explain more details of interaction between divalent cations and donor atoms of the ligand.

Keywords

Cryptand Complexation DFT NBO AIM NEDA 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the graduate office of University of Guilan for supporting of this work. M Arabieh would like to thank Dr. Rahil Yazdanshenas for her kindly support to Samyar.

Supplementary material

11224_2018_1268_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 3034 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Behjatmanesh-Ardakani R, Delarami Arab M, Saleem A, MosapourKotena Z, Bin Mohammad S (2016) NBO-NEDA and AIM studies on the interactions between benzocryptand [222B] and Li+, Na+, K+ and Ca2+. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 10:45–53Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang X, Wang H, Tan Y (2008) DFT study of the cryptand and benzocryptand and their complexes with alkali metal cations: Li+, Na+, K+. J Comput Chem 29:1423–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Puchta R, vanEldik R (2008) Host-guest complexes of mixed glycol-phenanthroline cryptands: prediction of ion selectivity by quantum chemical calculations IV. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem 60:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Begel S, Puchta R, vanEldik R (2013) Host–guest complexes of mixed glycol-bipyridinecryptands: prediction of ion selectivity by quantum chemical calculations. PartV Beilstein J Org Chem 9:1252–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramljak TS, Despotovic I, Bertosa B, Mlinaric-Majerski K (2013) Synthesis and alkali metal complexation studies of novel cage-functionalized cryptands. Tetrahedron 69:10610–10620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Banthia S, Samanta A (2002) Photophysical and transition-metal ion signaling behavior of a three-component system comprising a cryptand moiety as the receptor. J Phys Chem B 106:5572–5577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shi ZQ, Ji NN, Zhao RG, Li JK, Li ZF (2011) Temperature-dependent synthesis, crystal structures, characterizations, and DFT calculations of two new copper(II) complexes with ρ-fluorobenzoic acid and 2,2-bipyridine ligands. Struct Chem 22:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tamer Ö, Sarıboğa B, Uçar İ (2012) A combined crystallographic, spectroscopic, antimicrobial, and computational study of novel dipicolinate copper(II) complex with 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridine. Struct Chem 23:659–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van der Maelen JF, Cabeza JA (2016) A topological analysis of the bonding in [M2(CO)10] and [M3(μ-H)3(CO)12] complexes (M= Mn, Tc, Re). Theor Chem Accounts 135:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McMoran EP, Goodner JA, Powell DR, Yang L (2014) Synthesis and characterization of cu(II), Zn(II) and Fe(II) complexes supported by pyridylamide ligands. Inorg Chim Acta 421:465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arabieh M, Platas-Iglesias C (2016) A density functional theory study on the interaction of dipicolinic acid with hydrated Fe2+ cation. Comput Theor Chem 1090:134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Varadwaj PR, Varadwaj A, Marques HM (2011) DFT-B3LYP, NPA and QTAIM-based study of the physical properties of [M(II)(H2O)2(15-crown-5)] (M= Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn) complexes. J Phys Chem A 115:5592–5601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zheng X, Wang X, Yi SH, Wang N, Peng Y (2009) DFT study of the carbon and nitrogen-pivot lariat crown ethers and their complexes with alkali metal cations: Na+, K+. J Comput Chem 30:2674–2683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghalami-Choobar B, Ghiami-Shomami A (2015) Calculation of acidity/basicity values of some fluorinated compounds in gas phase and aqueous solution: a computational approach. Comput Theor Chem 1054:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seybold PG, Shields GC (2015) Computational estimation of pKa values. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 5:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li H, Fu A, Xue X, Guo F, Huai W, Chu T, Wang Z (2017) Density functional theory prediction of pKa for carboxylated single-wall carbon nanotubes and graphene. Chem Phys 490:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joback KG, Heberle JR, Bhown AS (2017) Influence of pKa and amine structure on energy consumption of post-combustion CO2 capture processes. Energy Procedia 114:1689–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Matsunaga N, Nguyen KA, Su SJ, Windus TL, Dupuis M, Montgomery JAJ (1993). Comput Chem 14:1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    AIM2000; designed by Biegler-K¨onig F, University of Applied Science: Bielefeld, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhurko G, Zhurko D (2011) ChemCraft Program Academic,version 1.6 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glendening ED, Reed AE, Carpenter JE, Weinhold F (1995) NBO version 3.1Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bode BM, Gordon MS (1999). J Mol Graph Model 16:133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JA Jr, Vreven T, Kudin KN, Burant JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Barone V, Mennucci B, Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox JE, Hratchian HP, Cross JB, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Ayala PY, Morokuma K, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Zakrzewski VG, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Strain MC, Farkas O, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cui Q, Baboul AG, Clifford S, Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Gonzalez C, Pople JA (2004) Gaussian 03, revision C.02. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CTGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Varadwaj PR, Varadwaj A, Peslherbe GH, Marques HM (2011) Conformational analysis of 18-Azacrown-6 and its bonding with late first transition series divalent metals: insight from DFT combined with NPA and QTAIM analyses. J Phys Chem A 115:13180–13190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hagen KS (1992) Transition metal in a cube—a discrete eight-coordinate [Mn2+ ⊂ [2.2.2]cryptand] as a body-centered cube with an N2O6 donor set. Angew Chem Int Ed Eng 31:764–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gandhi MN, Khopkar SM (1993) Liquid-liquid extraction of copper(II) with Cryptand 222 with erythrosine B as the counter-ion. Microchim Acta 111:93–101Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shaikh VR, Terdale SS, Abdul A, Gupta GR, Hundiwale DG, Patil KJ (2013) Volumetric studies of 2,2,2-cryptand in aqueous and aqueous KBr solutions at 298.15 K: an example involving solvent-induced hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions. J Solut Chem 42:2087–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghosh DC, Jibanananda J (1999) A study of correlation of the order of chemical reactivity of a sequence of binary compounds of nitrogen and oxygen in terms of frontier orbital theory. Curr Sci 76:570–573Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Varadwaj PR, Marques HM (2010) The physical chemistry of [M(H2O)4(NO3)2] (M= Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+) complexes: computational studies of their structure, energetics and the topological properties of the electron density. Theor Chem Accounts 127:711–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Varadwaj PR, Marques HM (2010) The physical chemistry of coordinated aqua-, ammine-, and mixe-dligand Co2+ complexes: DFT studies on the structure, energetics, and topological properties of the electron density. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:2126–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bader RFW (1990) Atoms in molecules: a quantum theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li K, Xue D (2006) Estimation of electronegativity values of elements in different valence states. J Phys Chem A 110:11332–11337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schenter GK, Glendening ED (1996) Natural energy decomposition analysis: the linear response electrical self energy. J Phys Chem 100:17152–17156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of GuilanRashtIran
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of GuilanRashtIran
  3. 3.Nuclear Science and Technology Research InstituteTehranIran

Personalised recommendations