Advertisement

Physical Simulation-Based Characterization of HAZ Properties in Steels. Part 1. High-Strength Steels and Their Hardness Profiling

  • R. P. S. Sisodia
  • M. GáspárEmail author
Article
  • 8 Downloads

In the vehicle industry, there is an increasing demand for wider application of high-strength steels. New generations of high-strength steels, with higher strength and toughness properties, are continuously developed by the steel producers. They provide good strength-to-weight ratios, acceptable weldability, improved toughness, and sufficient deformation capacity. However, the weldability of high-strength steels has still challenges which are as follows: cold cracking sensitivity; reduction of strength and toughness of heat affected zone (HAZ); filler material selection. In the HAZ of high-strength steels, hardened and softened zones can be found, where the base material can significantly lose its outstanding mechanical properties. In real welded joints, HAZ properties can be limitedly analyzed by conventional material tests. Therefore, physical simulators (i.e., Gleeble) were developed for the examination of different HAZ areas. Another motivation for the application of physical simulators is the time- and material-saving, as compared to real welding experiments. In this study, the weldability, especially HAZ properties of two high-strength structural steels (S960QL and S960M) from the same strength category (Rp0.2 = 960 MPa) and thickness (t = 15 mm) were compared and discussed. Two relevant technological variants for gas metal arc welding (GMAW), t8.5/5 = 5 and 30 s were applied during HAZ simulations and the effect of cooling time on the critical HAZ areas was analyzed. The properties of the selected coarse-grained, fine-grained, intercritical, and subcritical zones were investigated by the optical microscopy and hardness tests.

Keywords

thermomechanically controlled processed (TMCP) steel quenched and tempered steel; Rykalin 3D model heat-affected zone (HAZ) physical simulation weldability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the European Union and the Hungarian State and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund in the framework of the GINOP-2.3.4-15-2016-00004 Project.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Romeijn, Steel Bridges, Part 1, TU Delft (2006).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. N. Jha, K. Dutta, and K. K. Ray, “Effect of tempering on mechanical properties of V-added AISI 4335 steel,” ISIJ Int., 50, No. 4, 607–612 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Z. M. Shi, K. Liu, M. Q. Wang, et al., “Effect of tensile deformation of austenite on the morphology and strength of lath martensite,” Met. Mater. Int., 18, No. 2, 317–320 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Zhen, K. Zhang, Z. L. Guo, and J. B. Qu, “Effect of martensite fine structure on mechanical properties of an 1100 MPa grade ultra-high strength steel,” J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 22, No. 7, 645–651 (2015), https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(15)30052-2.
  5. 5.
    C. F. Wang, M. Q. Wang, J. Shi, et al., “Effect of microstructural refinement on the toughness of low carbon martensitic steel,” Scripta Mater., 58, No. 6, 492–495 (2008), https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.053.
  6. 6.
    M. S. Wæglowski, “Modern toughened steels – their properties and advantages,” Biuletyn Instytutu Spawalnictwa, NR 02, 25–36 (2012).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. A. Porter, “Weldable high-strength steels: challenges and engineering applications,” in: IIW 2015 Int. Conf. on High Strength Steels – Challenges and Applications (July 2–3, 2015, Helsinki, Finland), Paper IIW 2015 0102 (2015).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Klein, M. Sonnleitner, and P. Stiaszny, “Alform®x-treme innovation,” 1st Alform® Welding Day, Linz, Austria (2012).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Gogua, Use of High Strength Steel Grades for Economical Bridge Design, Delft University of Technology (2012).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Á. Dobosy and J. Lukács, “Welding properties and fatigue resistance of S690QL high strength steels,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 812, 29–34 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Gáspár and R. P. S. Sisodia, “Weldability analysis of Q+T and TMCP high strength steels by physical simulation,” in: 70th IIW Annual Assembly and Int. Conf. (June 29–30, 2017, Shanghai, China) (2017), pp. B166–B170.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruukki Metals in Hot Rolled Steel Products, General Presentation (2011).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Dutta, J. Wardenier, N. Yeomans, et al., CIDECT Design Guide for Fabrication, Assembly and Erection of Hollow Section Structures, TÜV-Verlag, Köln (1998).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Kuzsella, J. Lukács, and K. Szücs, “Nil-strength temperature and hot tensile tests on S960QL highstrength low-alloy steel,” Prod. Process. Syst., 6, No. 1, 67–78 (2013).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Gáspár, A. Balogh and J. Lukács, “Toughness examination of physically simulated S960QL HAZ by a special drilled specimen,” in: K. Jarmai and B. Bollo (Eds.), Vehicle and Automotive Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer (2017), pp. 469–481.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Kalácska, K. Májlinger, R. E Fábián, and P. R. Spena, “MIG-welding of dissimilar advanced high strength steel sheets,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 885, 80–85 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Nie, C. Shang, Y. You, et al., “960 MPa grade high performance weldable structural steel plate processed by using TMCP,” J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 17, No. 2, 63–66 (2010), https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60061-1.
  18. 18.
    Á. Dobosy and J. Lukács, “The effect of filler material choice on the high cycle fatigue resistance of high strength steel welded joints,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 885, 111–116 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Májlinger, E. Kalácska, and P. R. Spena, “Gas metal arc welding of dissimilar AHSS sheets,” Mater. Design, 109, 615–621 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z. Feng, Challenges and Opportunities in Joining Advanced High Strength Steels, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Wojnowski, Y. K. Oh, and J. E. Indacochea, “Metallurgical assessment of the softened HAZ region during multipass welding,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 122, No. 2, 310–315 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Madhusudan Reddy, T. Mohandas, and K. K. Papukutty, “Effect of welding process on the ballistic performance of high strength low-alloy steel weldments,” J. Mater. Process. Tech., 74, Nos. 1–3, 27–35 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. Magudeeswaran, V. Balasubramanian, G. Madhusudhan Reddy, and T. S. Balasubramanian, “Effect of welding processes and consumables on tensile and impact properties of high strength quenched and tempered steel joints,” J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 15, No. 6, 87–94 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    P. Nevasmaa, Evaluation of HAZ Toughness Properties in Modern Low-Carbon Low-Impurity 420, 550 and 700 MPa Yield Strength Thermomechanically Processed Steels with Emphasis on Local Brittle Zones, University of Oulu (1996).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia and R. W. K. Honeycombe, Steels Microstructure and Properties, 3rd edn, Butterworth–Heinemann (2006).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Gáspár, A. Balogh, and I. Sas, “Physical simulation aided process optimisation aimed sufficient HAZ toughness for quenched and tempered AHSS,” in: IIW 2015 Int. Conf. on High Strength Steels – Challenges and Applications (July 2–3, 2015, Helsinki, Finland), Paper IIW 2015 1504 (2015).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. J. Heikkilä, D. A. Porter, L. P. Karjalainen, et al., “Hardness profiles of quenched steel heat affected zones,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 762, 722–727 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Adonyi, “Heat-affected zone characterization by physical simulations: An overview on the use of the Gleeble discusses the advantages and disadvantages of thermomechanical simulation,” Weld. J., 85, No. 10, 42–47 (2006).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    QuikSimTM Software, Heat Affected Zone Programming Manual: Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) Programming.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    K. Hulka, A. Kern, and U. Schriever, “Application of niobium in quenched and tempered high-strength steels,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 500–501, 519–526 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    N. N. Rykalin, Calculation of Heat Flow in Welding [in Russian], GNTIML, Moscow (1951).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. P. S. Sisodia and N. Berrah, “Analysing HAZ softening of quenched and tempered steel by physical simulation,” in: Inter Talent UNIDEB Conference (April 7–8, 2016, University of Debrecen, Hungary).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. P. S. Sisodia, Comparative Analysis about the Weldability of Q+T and TMCP Steels by Physical Simulation, MSc Thesis, University of Miskolc, Hungary (2017).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Gáspár, Physical Simulation Based Development of Welding Technology for Quenched and Tempered Structural High-Strength Steels, PhD Thesis, University of Miskolc, Hungary (2016).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    P. Jambor, Physical Simulation Based Analysis of the Weldability of Thermomechanically Rolled High-Strength Steel [in Hungarian], MSc Thesis, University of Miskolc, Hungary (2017).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. Gáspár and A. Balogh, “GMAW experiments for advanced (Q+T) high strength steels,” Product. Process. Syst., 6, No. (1), 9–24 (2013).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Information ScienceUniversity of MiskolcMiskolcHungary

Personalised recommendations