Advertisement

Development of the Normative Framework Methodology for Justifying the Residual Resource of Starting Buildings’ Constructions of Space Launch Vehicles

  • V. S. HudramovichEmail author
  • V. N. Sirenko
  • D. V. Klimenko
  • Yu. F. Daniev
  • E. L. Hart
Article

The results of development of the normative framework for justifying the residual resource of starting building constructions of space launch vehicles for placing spacecrafts of various purposes into the Earth orbits are presented. Created starting complexes are successfully operated in various countries around the world where space-rocket hardware is well-developed; they represent a set of functionally interconnected mobile and stationary technical objects, control equipment and constructions designed to support and conduct all types of work with start preparation and rockets launching. Their features depend on the type and power of the launch vehicles, infrastructure characteristics (the location of the complex, the nomenclature of space objects, development level in the space-rocket technology area), and tasks which are solved during launching, etc. The solution of various issues, which arise while making the normative framework for justifying the resource of starting complexes, is caused by the need to consider the problems of strength and resource of heterogeneous elements of their designs and space-rocket technology designs. The main methodological stages of resource justification are defined. The limiting resource is considered to be the critical operating time, or the number of cycles (starts) during this time, after which the specified limiting states are reached in the hazardous areas of the structure, such as: critical cracks, fracture, formation of unacceptable plastic deformations, loss of stability, growth of corrosion damages, etc. It is noted that the physical nonlinearity of the material and statistical approaches determine the basis for calculating strength and resource. The classification of loads on the starting complexes is made. The concepts of low- and high-cycle fatigue are used. In developing strength standards and the basis for calculating resource, it is reasonable to use up-to-date methods of technical diagnostics, particularly, methods of holographic interferometry and acoustic emission, and fast-converging schemes of methods for numerical operational calculations.

Keywords

normative framework resource starting buildings space launch vehicles classification of loads and damages shock and wave acoustic and thermal loads low-cycle fatigue projection and iterative schemes of numerical operational calculations 

References

  1. 1.
    A. V. Degtyarev (Ed.), Sixty Years in Rocket Science and Astronautics [in Russian], APT Press, Dnepropetrovsk (2014).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    V. S. Hudramovych, V. N. Sirenko, D. V. Klymenko, and Yu. F. Daniev, “Making the methodology of normative fundamentals of resource calculation of starting buildings constructions of a space rocket vehicles,” in: Theory and Practice of Rational Designing, Manufacturing, and Operation of Machine-Building Constructions (Proc. of the VI Int. Sci.-Tech. Conf., Oct. 25–26, 2018, Lviv), KINPATRI Ltd, Lviv (2018), pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. V. Barmin (Ed.), Technological Objects of Ground-Based Infrastructure of Rocket and Space Technology [in Russian], Poligrafiks RPK, Moscow (2005–2006).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. V. Bolotin, Resource of Machines and Structures [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. T. Troshchenko (Ed.), Strength of Materials and Structures [in Russian], Academperiodika, Kiev (2005).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. V. Karmishin, A. I. Likhoded, N. G. Panichkin, and S. A. Sukhinin, Fundamentals of Rocket-Space Structures Development [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. A. Makhutov (Ed.), Strength, Resource, Survivability, and Safety of Machines [in Russian], Librokom, Moscow (2008).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. V. Panasyuk (Ed.), Fracture Mechanics and Strength of Materials [in Ukrainian], in 14 volumes, Academperiodica, Kyiv (2004–2012).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. J. McEvily, Metal Failures: Mechanisms, Analysis, Preventation, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2002).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. N. Guz’ (Ed.), Achievements of Mechanics [in Russian], in 6 volumes and 7 books, A.S.K. (vol. 1–3), LITERA (vol. 4–6), Kiev (2005–2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ya. I. Burak and R. M. Kushnir (Eds.), Modeling and Optimization in the Thermomechanics of Electrically Conducting Nonuniform Bodies [in Ukrainian], in 5 volumes, Spolom, Lviv (2006–2011).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Z. T. Nazarchuk (Ed.), Technical Diagnostics of Materials and Structures [in Ukrainian], in 8 volumes, Prostir-M, Lviv (2016–2018).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. A Makhutov, Yu. G. Matvienko, and A. N. Romanov, Problems of Strength, Technogenic Safety and Structural Material Science [in Russian], URSS, Moscow (2018).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu. N. Rabotnov, Creep of Elements of Structures [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1966).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. S. Hudramovich and E. S. Pereverzev, Bearing Ability and Durability of Elements of Constructions [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. I. Mossakovskii, V. S. Hudramovich, and E. M. Makeev, Contact Interaction of Elements of Shell Constructions [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1988).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. S. Pereverzev, Yu. F. Daniev, and G. P. Fillet, Random Signals in Problems of Estimation of the Condition of Technical Systems [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1992).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. A. Il’yushin, Works: 1946–1966 [in Russian], in 4 volumes, Vol. 2: Plasticity, Fizmatlit, Moscow (2004).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. S. Hudramovich, Theory of Creep and Its Applications to the Calculation of Elements of Constructions [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (2005).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. N. Petrenko (Ed.), Yu. F. Daniev, A. V. Demchenko, et al., Space Aircraft. Introduction to Space Technology [in Russian], ART-Press, Dnepropetrovsk (2007).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. S. Hudramovych, “Contact mechanics of shell structures under local loading,” Int. Appl. Mech., 45, No. 7, 708–729 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. V. Degtyarev, O. V. Pilipenko, V. S. Gudramovich, et al., “On classification of launch equipment of rocket and space complexes at justification of strength standards,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol., 22, No. 1, 3–13 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. D. Mesaroviã, D. Macko, and Y. Takahara, Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel, Systems, Academic Press, New York–London (1970).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. A. Krasnosel’skii, G. M. Vainikko, P. P. Zabreiko, et al., Approximate Solution of Operator Equations [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1969).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. S. Hudramovich, E. L. Hart, and S. A. Ryabokon’, “Plastic deformation of nonhomogeneous plates,” J. Math. Eng., 78, No. 1, 181–197 (2013).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Z. T. Nazarchuk (Ed.), V. S. Hudramovych, V. R. Skal’s’kyi, and Yu. M. Selivanov, Holographic and Acoustic-Emission Diagnostics of Heterogeneous Constructions and Materials [in Ukrainian], Prostir-M, Lviv (2017).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    V. S. Hudramovich, D. V. Klimenko, and E. L. Hart, “Influence of cuts on the strength of cylindrical compartments of launch vehicles with inelastic material deformation,” Kosm. Nauka Tekhnol., 23, No. 6, 12–20 (2017).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. L. Hart and V. S. Hudramovich, “Projection-iterative modification of the method of local variations for problems with a quadratic functional,” J. Appl. Math. Mech., 80, No. 2, 156–163 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. A. Lebedev (Ed.), Mechanical Properties of Structural Materials in a Complex Stress State [in Russian], InYure, Kiev (2003).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    V. T. Troshchenko and L. A. Khamaza, “Conditions for the transition from nonlocalized to localized damage in metals and alloys. Part 3. Determination of the transition conditions by the analysis of crack propagation kinetics,” Strength Mater., 46, No. 5, 583–594 (2014).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    V. T. Troshchenko and L. A. Sosnovskii, Fatigue Resistance of Metals and Alloys [in Russian], in 2 volumes, Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1987).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    V. I. Dobrovol’skii and S. V. Dobrovol’skii, Deformation Methods for Evaluating Low-Cycle Strength [in Russian], IzhGTU, Izhevsk (2005).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. S. Manson and G. R. Halford, Fatigue and Durability of Structural Materials, ASM International, Materials Park, OH (2006).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    I. A. Birger, B. F. Shorr, and G. B. Iosilevich, Calculation of the Strength of Machine Parts [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1993).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. A. Bigus and Yu. F. Daniev, Technical Diagnostics of Hazardous Production Facilities [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (2010).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    G. S. Pisarenko and V. A. Strizalo, Experimental Methods of Mechanics of a Deformable Solid Body [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (2018).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    G. A. Bigus, Yu. F. Daniev, N. A. Bystrov, and D. I. Galkin, Fundamentals of Diagnostics of Technical Devices and Structures [in Russian], MVTU, Moscow (2018).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. S. Hudramovich
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. N. Sirenko
    • 2
  • D. V. Klimenko
    • 2
  • Yu. F. Daniev
    • 1
  • E. L. Hart
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Technical Mechanics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the State Space Agency of UkraineDneprUkraine
  2. 2.Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design OfficeDneprUkraine
  3. 3.Oles Honchar Dnipro National UniversityDneprUkraine

Personalised recommendations