Strength of Materials

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 901–908 | Cite as

Effect of Dynamic Loads on the Limit Stresses and Second Critical Brittle Temperatures of Butt Weld Joints

  • V. A. Degtyarev

Experimental results for cracked butt weld joints of 09G2 and 12GN2MFAYu steels are evaluated at different ratios of static and dynamic stresses over a wide range of climatic temperatures. The tests were performed on a unit built upon the impact-testing machine. The opening of crack edges was measured with a displacement gauge. The crack propagation was followed with a TV camera and microscope. In low-temperature tests of specimens over the range of 20–(−100)°C, cooling and automatic temperature control systems were used. Experimental studies resulted in the diagrams of limit stresses, their assessment demonstrated that static and breaking dynamic loads were linearly related. At a preset temperature, the dynamic component of limit stress is shown to decrease with the static one. The weld joint of 09G2 steel was established to exhibit higher sensitivity to dynamic loads over the whole temperature range. It was demonstrated that limit stresses and second critical brittle temperatures should be evaluated with due regard to both static and dynamic components. The limit stress and second critical brittle temperature under combined loading of weld joints are dependent on the ratio of static and dynamic stresses. Without regard for dynamic stresses, underestimation of limit stresses and overestimation of second critical brittle temperatures are taking place. With an increase in dynamic overloading coefficients and dynamic ratios, the limit stress decreases, while the second critical brittle temperature increases. Second critical brittle temperatures of weld joints in steels with higher mechanical properties are found to be much lower.


weld joint critical brittle temperature diagram of limit stresses yield stress 


  1. 1.
    R. S. Grigor’ev, V. P. Larionov, and Yu. S. Urzhumtsev, Methods of Performance Improvement of Equipment in Northern Version [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. D. Telushkin, V. A. Vinokurov, V. A. Ryakhin, et al., Building and Road Machines for Cold Climate Regions [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. I. Sleptsov, B. S. Shul’ginov, V. E. Mikhailov, et al., Strength Enhancement of Welded Metal Constructions of Mining and Transport Engineering under North Conditions [in Russian], Nauka, Nowosibirsk (2012).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. A. Makhutov, Brittle Fracture Resistance of Structure Elements [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1973).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. I. Trufyakov, Fatigue of Weld Joints [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1973).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    GOST 25.506-85. Methods of Mechanical Testing of Metals. Determination of Crack Resistance (Fracture Toughness) Characteristics under Static Loading [in Russian]. Valid since January 1, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. A. Degtyarev, “Equipment of type DSO for fatigue testing in repeated impact and harmonic loading with various stress ratios,” Strength Mater., 14, No. 10, 1413–1416 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Degtyarev
    • 1
  1. 1.Pisarenko Institute of Problems of StrengthNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations