Advertisement

Strength of Materials

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 868–873 | Cite as

Stress-Strain Assessment for Laminated Aircraft Cockpit Windows at Static and Dynamic Loads

  • Yu. M. RodichevEmail author
  • N. V. Smetankina
  • O. M. Shupikov
  • S. V. Ugrimov
Article
  • 10 Downloads

The method of strength calculations for laminated aircraft cockpit windows influenced by different operating factors (bird strike, pressurization) is devised. The method is based on embedding the initial uncanonical shell in the auxiliary one of canonical form in plan with the boundary conditions, which permit of a simple analytical problem solution as a trigonometric series. For satisfying the initial boundary conditions, the auxiliary shell is supplemented with compensating loads, which are continuously distributed over the contour of the initial shell. The compensating loads enter in the equations of motion for the auxiliary shell as integral relations. The system of motion equations is rearranged in the system of ordinary differential equations of second order, which is integrated by the solution expansion in the Taylor series. The windows are treated as a laminated open-ended cylindrical shell consisting of isotropic layers of constant thickness. The laminated window model is based on the modified theory of first order that accounts for transverse shear strains, thickness reduction, rotary inertia, and compression of the normal element in each layer. For the composition, the hypothesis of broken line is valid. The model of pressure pulse that apparently represents the effect of the bird impact on the windows was constructed on the basis of experimental studies. The stress-strain state of the window element in AN aircrafts was evaluated, set on the bird strike and cockpit pressurization. Five window alternatives are examined. Calculation results are in good agreement with experimental data. The results become theoretical and practical backgrounds for engineering calculations and optimum design of laminated aircraft window elements influenced by different operating factors. Thus, the advanced method can be applied to estimation of the lifetime of existing window elements and development of the new ones.

Keywords

laminated windows bird strike pressurization nonstationary vibrations strength 

References

  1. 1.
    A. F. Johnson and M. Holzapfel, “Modelling soft body impact on composite structures,” Compos. Struct., 61, Nos. 1–2, 103–113 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Anghileri, L.-M. L. Castelletti, and V. Mazza, “Birdstrike: approaches to the analysis of impacts with penetration,” WIT Trans. Eng. Sci., 49, 63–74 (2005).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Ãwiklak, “Bird modelling for simulation of bird strikes,” J. KONES Powertrain Transport, 22, No. 2, 25–32 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Adamski and A. Masùowski, “On civil air task and e-training problems of UAV applications,” Zeszyty Naukowe, 185A, 7–18 (2011).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Abrate, “Soft impacts on aerospace structures,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 81, 1–17 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Heimbs, “Computational methods for bird strike simulations: a review,” Comput. Struct., 89, Nos. 23–24, 2093–2112 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Airoldi and B. Cacchione, “Modelling of impact forces and pressures in Lagrangian bird strike analyses,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 32, No. 10, 1651–1677 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. Smojver and D. Ivanèeviã, “Bird strike damage analysis in aircraft structures using Abaqus/Explicit and coupled Eulerian Lagrangian approach,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 71, No. 4, 489–498 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. V. Smetankina, A. N. Shupikov, S. Yu. Sotrikhin, and V. G. Yareshchenko, “A noncanonically shape laminated plate subjected to impact loading: Theory and experiment,” J. Appl. Mech., 75, No. 5, 051004-1–051004-9 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. V. Smetankina, Nonstationary Deformation, Thermoelasticity, and Optimization of Laminated Plates and Cylindrical Shells [in Russian], Mis’kdruk, Kharkov (2011).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Lampart, A. Rusanov, S. Yershov, et al., “Validation of 3D RANS solver with a state equation of thermally perfect and calorically imperfect gas on a multi-stage low- pressure steam turbine flow,” J. Fluids Eng., 127, No. 1, 83–93 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Heimbs, J. Ritzer, and J. Markmiller, “A numerical method for blast shock wave analysis of missile launch from aircraft,” Int. J. Aerospace Eng., 2015, Article ID 897213 (2015), DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/897213.
  13. 13.
    A. Rusanov, R. Rusanov, and P. Lampart, “Designing and updating the flow part of axial and radial-axial turbines through mathematical modeling,” Open Eng., 5, No. 1, 399–410 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. N. Shupikov, S. V. Ugrimov, N. V. Smetankina, et al., “Bird dummy for investigating the bird-strike resistance of aircraft components,” J. Aircraft, 50, No. 3, 817–826 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. M. Rodichev
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. V. Smetankina
    • 2
  • O. M. Shupikov
    • 2
  • S. V. Ugrimov
    • 2
  1. 1.Pisarenko Institute of Problems of StrengthNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine
  2. 2.Pidgorny Institute of Engineering ProblemsNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKharkivUkraine

Personalised recommendations