Advertisement

Do preservice teachers’ judgments and judgment accuracy depend on students’ characteristics? The effect of gender and immigration background

  • Meike BonefeldEmail author
  • Oliver Dickhäuser
  • Karina Karst
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

It is important for teachers to be able to accurately assess students’ performance. Such judgments can be influenced by characteristics of the student Südkamp et al. (J Educ Psychol 104:743–762, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027627). Besides students’ actual performance, students’ group characteristics (e.g., gender or immigration background) may effect teachers’ judgments. In addition, judgment accuracy might be different for various student groups. We conducted an online study of 168 preservice teachers. We presented within a virtual classroom mathematics test results of 12 fictitious second-grade students who differed in their actual performance in a mathematical test, immigration background, and gender. Preservice teachers made a judgment about the students’ current performance. Students’ actual performance, immigration background, and gender showed statistically significant main effects on the judgment. Students with (vs. without) an immigration background and female (vs. male) students were evaluated less favorably. These effects were qualified by a statistically significant three-way interaction between actual performance, immigration background, and gender. The joint examination of student characteristics in terms of judgment accuracy shows that it is precisely the interaction of student characteristics that makes a difference: female students with and without an immigration background as well as students without an immigration background are assessed more accurately, while male students with an immigration background are assessed significantly more inaccurately. In sum, the judgment made by preservice teachers about students’ performance differed in terms of student characteristics that were unrelated to performance such as immigration background and gender in addition to differing on performance-related variables.

Keywords

Judgment accuracy Gender Immigration background Bias Teacher expectation Performance assessment 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Participation in the following study was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all participants via online consent forms that were embedded in the survey. Every participant had to agree to the following statement: “I hereby confirm that I am of age, that I have read the consent form, and that I agree to take part in this study under the described conditions.” Participants were assured that all of their responses would remain confidential and they could stop filling in the questionnaire at any time. The studies were conducted in full accordance with the Ethical Guidelines of the German Association of Psychologists (DGPs) and the American Psychological Association (APA). At the time the data were acquired, it was not customary at most German universities to seek ethical approval for survey studies on such a subject. The study exclusively makes use of anonymous questionnaires. No identifying information was obtained from participants. We had no reason to assume that our survey would induce persisting negative states (e.g., clinical depression) in the participants.

References

  1. Alvidrez, J., & Weinstein, R. S. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 731–746.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.91.4.731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artelt, C., & Rausch, T. (2014). Accuracy of teacher judgments. In S. Krolak-Schwerdt, S. Glock, & M. Böhmer (Eds.), Teachers’ professional development (pp. 27–43). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Artelt, C., Stanat, P., Schneider, W., & Schiefele, U. (2001). Lesekompetenz: Testkonzeption und Ergebnisse. In J. Baumert, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, P. Stanat, K. J. Tillmann, & M. Weiß (Eds.), PISA 2000 (pp. 69–137). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software,67, 1–48.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumert, J., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Brunner, M. (2009). Large-scale student assessment studies measure the results of processes of knowledge acquisition: Evidence in support of the distinction between intelligence and student achievement. Educational Research Review,4, 165–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begeny, J. C., Eckert, T. L., Montarello, S. A., & Storie, M. S. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ reading abilities: An examination of the relationship between teachers’ judgments and students’ performance across a continuum of rating methods. School Psychology Quarterly,23, 43–55.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biernat, M. (2012). Stereotypes and shifting standards: Forming, communicating, and translating person impressions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1–59.Google Scholar
  8. Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender-and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72, 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonefeld, M., & Dickhäuser, O. (2018). (Biased) Grading of students’ performance: Students’ names, performance level, and implicit attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology,9, 481.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonefeld, M., Dickhäuser, O., Janke, S., Praetorius, A.-K., & Dresel, M. (2017). Migrationsbedingte Disparitäten in der Notenvergabe nach dem Übergang auf das Gymnasium. [Student grading according to migration background]. Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie,49, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (Eds.). (1986). Handbook of research on teaching: a project of the American Educational Research Association. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Czopp, A. M., Kay, A. C., & Cheryan, S. (2015). Positive stereotypes are pervasive and powerful. Perspectives on Psychological Science,10, 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44, 20–33.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dauber, S. L., Alexander, K. L., & Entwisle, D. R. (1996). Tracking and transitions through the middle grades: Channeling educational trajectories. Sociology of Education,4, 290–307.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2112716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dee, T. S. (2005). A teacher like me: Does race, ethnicity, or gender matter? The American Economic Review,95, 158–165.  https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demaray, M. K., & Elliot, S. N. (1998). Teachers’ judgments of students’ academic functioning: A comparison of actual and predicted performances. School Psychology Quarterly,13, 8–24.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feinberg, A. B., & Shapiro, E. S. (2003). Accuracy of teacher judgments in predicting oral reading fluency. School Psychology Quarterly,18, 52–65.  https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.1.52.20876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fennema, E., Peterson, P., Carpenter, T. P., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics,21, 55–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review,107, 659–676.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Froehlich, L., Martiny, S. E., Deaux, K., & Mok, S. Y. (2016). It’s their responsibility, not ours. Social Psychology,47, 74–86.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghavami, N., & Peplau, L. A. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly,37, 113–127.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glock, S. (2016). Stop talking out of turn: The influence of students’ gender and ethnicity on preservice teachers’ intervention strategies for student misbehavior. Teaching and Teacher Education,56, 106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glock, S., & Klapproth, F. (2017). Bad boys, good girls? Implicit and explicit attitudes toward ethnic minority students among elementary and secondary school teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation,53, 77–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glock, S., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2013). Does nationality matter? The impact of stereotypical expectations on student teachers’ judgments. Social Psychology of Education,1, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9197-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glock, S., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Klapproth, F., & Böhmer, M. (2013). Beyond judgment bias: How students’ ethnicity and academic profile consistency influence teachers’ tracking judgments. Social Psychology of Education,16, 555–573.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9227-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glock, S., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Pit-ten Cate, I. M. (2015). Are school placement recommendations accurate? The effect of students’ ethnicity on teachers’ judgments and recognition memory. European Journal of Psychology of Education,30, 169–188.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0237-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harwell, M. R., Post, T. R., Maeda, Y., Davis, J. D., Cutler, A. L., Andersen, E., et al. (2007). Standards-based mathematics curricula and secondary students’ performance on standardized achievement tests. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,38, 71–101.Google Scholar
  29. Helmke, A., & Schrader, F.-W. (1987). Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgement accuracy on achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education,3, 91–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(87)90010-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holder, K., & Kessels, U. (2017). Gender and ethnic stereotypes in student teachers’ judgments: a new look from a shifting standards perspective. Social Psychology of Education,20, 471–490.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9384-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). Teacher expectations: II. Construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,63, 947–961.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahraman, B., & Knoblich, G. (2000). “Stechen statt Sprechen”: Valenz und Aktivierbarkeit von Stereotypen über Türken.[Valence and Activation of Stereotypes about Turks]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie,31, 31–43.  https://doi.org/10.1024//0044-3514.31.1.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaiser, J., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction,28, 73–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaiser, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2017). The effects of student characteristics on teachers’ judgment accuracy: Disentangling ethnicity, minority status, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,109, 871–888.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karst, K., Bonefeld, M., & Siebert, J. (2019). Mannheimer Inventar zur Testung der Urteilsakkuratheit—MITU. [Mannheim inventory for testing judgement accuracy - MITU]. Retrieved from https://www.sowi.uni-mannheim.de/media/Lehrstuehle/sowi/Karst/Dateien/MITU_Instrument_091018.pdf.
  36. Karst, K., Dotzel, S., & Dickhäuser, O. (2018). Comparing global judgments and specific judgments of teachers about students’ knowledge: Is the whole the sum of its parts? Teaching and Teacher Education.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Karst, K., Hartig, J., Kaiser, J., & Lipowsky, F. (2017). Multilevel models as a tool for analyzing diagnostic competence of teachers—A linear mixed modell and its applicatioin in R. In A. Südkamp & A.-K. Praetorius (Eds.), Diagnostische Kompetenz von Lehrkräftem: Theoretische und methodische Weiterentwicklingen (pp. 153–173). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  38. Kristen, C., & Granato, N. (2007). The educational attainment of the second generation in Germany: Social origins and ethnic inequality. Ethnicities,7, 343–366.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796807080233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumar, R., Karabenick, S. A., & Burgoon, J. N. (2015). Teachers’ implicit attitudes, explicit beliefs, and the mediating role of respect and cultural responsibility on mastery and performance-focused instructional practices. Journal of Educational Psychology,107, 533–545.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Educational Research,41, 63–76.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188990410106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lipowsky, F., Faust, G., & Kastens, C. (2013). Personality and learning development at state and private primary school: Results of the PERLE-survey regarding the first two school years. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. Lorenz, G., Gentrup, S., Kristen, C., Stanat, P., & Kogan, I. (2016). Stereotype bei Lehrkräften? Eine Untersuchung systematisch verzerrter Lehrererwartungen. [Teacher stereotypes? A study of systematically biased teacher expectations]. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie,68, 89–111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-015-0352-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Machts, N., Kaiser, J., Schmidt, F. T. C., & Möller, J. (2016). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review,19, 85–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Milne, A. B. (1995). The dissection of selection in person perception: Inhibitory processes in social stereotyping.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 397-407.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Madelaine, A., & Wheldall, K. (2005). Identifying low-progress readers: Comparing teacher judgment with a curriculum-based measurement procedure. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education,52, 33–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120500071886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCombs, R. C., & Gay, J. (1988). Effects of race, class, and IQ information on judgments of parochial grade school teachers. The Journal of Social Psychology,128, 647–652.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9922918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Muzzatti, B., & Agnoli, F. (2007). Gender and mathematics: Attitudes and stereotype threat susceptibility in Italian children. Developmental Psychology,43, 747–759.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology,2, 175–220.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,106, 10593–10597.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nürnberger, M., Nerb, J., Schmitz, F., Keller, J., & Sütterlin, S. (2016). Implicit gender stereotypes and essentialist beliefs predict preservice teachers’ tracking recommendations. The Journal of Experimental Education,84, 152–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1027807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parks, F. R., & Kennedy, J. H. (2007). The impact of race, physical attractiveness, and gender on education majors’ and teachers’ perceptions of students. Journal of Black Studies,6, 936–943.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934705285955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.Google Scholar
  53. R Core Team. (2016). Package ‘ggplot2’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/ggplot2.pdf.
  54. Riegle-Crumb, C., & Humphries, M. (2012). Exploring bias in math teachers’ perceptions of students’ ability by gender and race/ethnicity. Gender & Society: Official Publication of Sociologists for Women in Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211434614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rustemeyer, R. (1999). Teacher’s expectations of gender-specific performance in mathematics and the corresponding (self-) evaluation of school-girls and boys. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht,46, 187–200.Google Scholar
  56. Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology,102, 947–963.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strand, S. (2014). Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: Intersectionality and ‘Getting it’for the white working class. Research Papers in Education,29(2), 131–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,104, 743–762.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taylor, S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Psychological revivals (pp. 83–211). New York: Psychological Press.Google Scholar
  60. Tiedemann, J. (2000). Parents’ gender stereotypes and teachers’ beliefs as predictors of children’s concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology,92, 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics,50(1), 49–62.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020518104346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tobisch, A., & Dresel, M. (2017). Negatively or positively biased? Dependencies of teachers’ judgments and expectations based on students’ ethnic and social backgrounds. Social Psychology of Education,20, 731–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Van den Bergh, L., Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., Voeten, M., & Holland, R. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers. American Educational Research Journal,47, 497–527.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209353594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weinert, F. E., & Helmke, A. (1995). Interclassroom differences in instructional quality and interindividual differences in cognitive development. Educational Psychologist,30, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wiggan, G. (2007). Race, school achievement, and educational inequality: Toward a student-based inquiry perspective. Review of Educational Research,77, 310–333.  https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430303947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Sciences, Department of PsychologyUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations